Cargando…

Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair is an alternative surgical procedure. We present our experience and outcome of the way. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 230 patients who received anterior tension-free hernia repair be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Weiming, Li, Yijun, Ding, Lili, Chen, Xiongzhi, Xu, Qingwen, Li, Shumin, Xu, Pengyuan, Sun, Dali, Sun, Yanbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0627-0
_version_ 1783464047303196672
author Li, Weiming
Li, Yijun
Ding, Lili
Chen, Xiongzhi
Xu, Qingwen
Li, Shumin
Xu, Pengyuan
Sun, Dali
Sun, Yanbo
author_facet Li, Weiming
Li, Yijun
Ding, Lili
Chen, Xiongzhi
Xu, Qingwen
Li, Shumin
Xu, Pengyuan
Sun, Dali
Sun, Yanbo
author_sort Li, Weiming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair is an alternative surgical procedure. We present our experience and outcome of the way. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 230 patients who received anterior tension-free hernia repair between May 2016 to May 2017. Among these cases, 120 were performed using the traditional transinguinal preperitoneal (TTIPP) technique while 100 were performed using the vascular anatomic landmark transinguinal preperitoneal (VALTIPP) technique. Between these two groups, we compared the operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 2 days, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Surgery was well-tolerated in both groups with no significant hemorrhage or complications. The operation times for the VALTIPP and TTIPP groups were 42.52 ± 9.15 and 53.84 ± 10.64 min (P < 0.05), respectively. Ten patients in the VALTIPP group and 17 patients in the TTIPP group reported sensations of foreign bodies (P < 0.05). The VAS pain score in VALTIPP patients at 2 days (4.0 ± 0.5), 3 months (1.0 ± 0.3), and 6 months (0.9 ± 0.3) were significantly lower when compared with those of TTIPP patients (5.3 ± 0.9 at 2 days, 1.8 ± 0.4 at 3 months, and 1.1 ± 0.1 at 6 months, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in age, gender, BMI, hernia type and location, follow-up period, incidence of post-operative seromas, recurrence rate, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Anterior inguinal hernia repair using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks may lead to reduced operation times, reduced sensations of foreign bodies, and reduced post-operative pain. This technique is simple, practical, and effective in the management of inguinal hernias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68209322019-11-04 Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair Li, Weiming Li, Yijun Ding, Lili Chen, Xiongzhi Xu, Qingwen Li, Shumin Xu, Pengyuan Sun, Dali Sun, Yanbo BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair is an alternative surgical procedure. We present our experience and outcome of the way. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 230 patients who received anterior tension-free hernia repair between May 2016 to May 2017. Among these cases, 120 were performed using the traditional transinguinal preperitoneal (TTIPP) technique while 100 were performed using the vascular anatomic landmark transinguinal preperitoneal (VALTIPP) technique. Between these two groups, we compared the operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 2 days, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Surgery was well-tolerated in both groups with no significant hemorrhage or complications. The operation times for the VALTIPP and TTIPP groups were 42.52 ± 9.15 and 53.84 ± 10.64 min (P < 0.05), respectively. Ten patients in the VALTIPP group and 17 patients in the TTIPP group reported sensations of foreign bodies (P < 0.05). The VAS pain score in VALTIPP patients at 2 days (4.0 ± 0.5), 3 months (1.0 ± 0.3), and 6 months (0.9 ± 0.3) were significantly lower when compared with those of TTIPP patients (5.3 ± 0.9 at 2 days, 1.8 ± 0.4 at 3 months, and 1.1 ± 0.1 at 6 months, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in age, gender, BMI, hernia type and location, follow-up period, incidence of post-operative seromas, recurrence rate, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Anterior inguinal hernia repair using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks may lead to reduced operation times, reduced sensations of foreign bodies, and reduced post-operative pain. This technique is simple, practical, and effective in the management of inguinal hernias. BioMed Central 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6820932/ /pubmed/31664989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0627-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Weiming
Li, Yijun
Ding, Lili
Chen, Xiongzhi
Xu, Qingwen
Li, Shumin
Xu, Pengyuan
Sun, Dali
Sun, Yanbo
Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair
title Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair
title_full Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair
title_fullStr Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair
title_full_unstemmed Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair
title_short Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair
title_sort using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0627-0
work_keys_str_mv AT liweiming usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT liyijun usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT dinglili usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT chenxiongzhi usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT xuqingwen usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT lishumin usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT xupengyuan usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT sundali usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair
AT sunyanbo usinginferiorepigastricvascularanatomicallandmarksforanterioringuinalherniarepair