Cargando…
Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review
Epilepsy affects nearly 1% of the world’s population. A third of epilepsy patients suffer from a kind of epilepsy that cannot be controlled by current medications. For those where surgery is not an option, neurostimulation may be the only alternative to bring relief, improve quality of life, and avo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0605-x |
_version_ | 1783464060743843840 |
---|---|
author | Bigelow, Matthew D. Kouzani, Abbas Z. |
author_facet | Bigelow, Matthew D. Kouzani, Abbas Z. |
author_sort | Bigelow, Matthew D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epilepsy affects nearly 1% of the world’s population. A third of epilepsy patients suffer from a kind of epilepsy that cannot be controlled by current medications. For those where surgery is not an option, neurostimulation may be the only alternative to bring relief, improve quality of life, and avoid secondary injury to these patients. Until recently, open loop neurostimulation was the only alternative for these patients. However, for those whose epilepsy is applicable, the medical approval of the responsive neural stimulation and the closed loop vagal nerve stimulation systems have been a step forward in the battle against uncontrolled epilepsy. Nonetheless, improvements can be made to the existing systems and alternative systems can be developed to further improve the quality of life of sufferers of the debilitating condition. In this paper, we first present a brief overview of epilepsy as a disease. Next, we look at the current state of biomarker research in respect to sensing and predicting epileptic seizures. Then, we present the current state of open loop neural stimulation systems. We follow this by investigating the currently approved, and some of the recent experimental, closed loop systems documented in the literature. Finally, we provide discussions on the current state of neural stimulation systems for controlling epilepsy, and directions for future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6820988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68209882019-11-04 Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review Bigelow, Matthew D. Kouzani, Abbas Z. J Neuroeng Rehabil Review Epilepsy affects nearly 1% of the world’s population. A third of epilepsy patients suffer from a kind of epilepsy that cannot be controlled by current medications. For those where surgery is not an option, neurostimulation may be the only alternative to bring relief, improve quality of life, and avoid secondary injury to these patients. Until recently, open loop neurostimulation was the only alternative for these patients. However, for those whose epilepsy is applicable, the medical approval of the responsive neural stimulation and the closed loop vagal nerve stimulation systems have been a step forward in the battle against uncontrolled epilepsy. Nonetheless, improvements can be made to the existing systems and alternative systems can be developed to further improve the quality of life of sufferers of the debilitating condition. In this paper, we first present a brief overview of epilepsy as a disease. Next, we look at the current state of biomarker research in respect to sensing and predicting epileptic seizures. Then, we present the current state of open loop neural stimulation systems. We follow this by investigating the currently approved, and some of the recent experimental, closed loop systems documented in the literature. Finally, we provide discussions on the current state of neural stimulation systems for controlling epilepsy, and directions for future studies. BioMed Central 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6820988/ /pubmed/31665058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0605-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Bigelow, Matthew D. Kouzani, Abbas Z. Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review |
title | Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review |
title_full | Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review |
title_fullStr | Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review |
title_short | Neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review |
title_sort | neural stimulation systems for the control of refractory epilepsy: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0605-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bigelowmatthewd neuralstimulationsystemsforthecontrolofrefractoryepilepsyareview AT kouzaniabbasz neuralstimulationsystemsforthecontrolofrefractoryepilepsyareview |