Cargando…

The Balance Intensity Scales for Therapists and Exercisers Measure Balance Exercise Intensity in Older Adults: Initial Validation Using Rasch Analysis

BACKGROUND: The Balance Intensity Scales (BIS) have been developed to measure the intensity of balance exercise in older adults. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether the BIS for therapists (BIS-T) and for exercisers (BIS-E) are unidimensional measures of balance exercise intensity, able...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farlie, Melanie K, Keating, Jennifer L, Molloy, Elizabeth, Bowles, Kelly-Ann, Neave, Becky, Yamin, Jessica, Weightman, Jussyan, Saber, Kelly, Haines, Terry P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzz092
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The Balance Intensity Scales (BIS) have been developed to measure the intensity of balance exercise in older adults. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether the BIS for therapists (BIS-T) and for exercisers (BIS-E) are unidimensional measures of balance exercise intensity, able to be refined using the Rasch model into a hierarchical item order, and appropriately targeted for the older adult population with a variety of diagnoses in a range of exercise testing settings. DESIGN: This was a scale development study using a pragmatic mixed-methods approach. METHODS: Older adult exercisers (n = 108) and their therapists (n = 33) were recruited from a large metropolitan health service and rated balance exercise tasks on the BIS-T and BIS-E in a single session. RESULTS: Scores on both the BIS items and global effort ratings for therapists and exercisers had good correlation and demonstrated unidimensionality. The BIS-T and BIS-E demonstrated a hierarchical distribution of items that fit the Rasch model. The Person Separation Index was moderate (0.62) for the BIS-T but poor (0.33) for the BIS-E. LIMITATIONS: The limitations were that therapists in this study underprescribed high-intensity balance tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Initial validation of the BIS-T and the BIS-E demonstrated that these scales can be used for the measurement of balance exercise intensity in older adult populations. The BIS-T items and global effort ratings are recommended for use by therapists, and the global effort ratings are recommended for use by exercisers. Ongoing validation of both scales using high-intensity balance task ratings and different populations of older adults is recommended.