Cargando…

Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization

BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is considered the most common and devastating complication of transradial approach (TRA). It has been described as the “Achilles’ heel” of the transradial technique. Our aim was to assess the incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transrad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadaka, Mohamed A., Etman, Waleed, Ahmed, Walid, Kandil, Saeed, Eltahan, Salah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0008-0
_version_ 1783464136572665856
author Sadaka, Mohamed A.
Etman, Waleed
Ahmed, Walid
Kandil, Saeed
Eltahan, Salah
author_facet Sadaka, Mohamed A.
Etman, Waleed
Ahmed, Walid
Kandil, Saeed
Eltahan, Salah
author_sort Sadaka, Mohamed A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is considered the most common and devastating complication of transradial approach (TRA). It has been described as the “Achilles’ heel” of the transradial technique. Our aim was to assess the incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization. RESULTS: This was a prospective study enrolling 164 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) via the transradial approach (TRA) using 6-F catheters. Doppler ultrasonography assessment of the radial artery (RA) was conducted on day 1 and 6 months following the procedure. The studied group included 104 male (63.4%) and 60 female (36.6%) patients with a mean age of 57.7 ± 8.8 years and a mean RA diameter of 2.8 ± 0.5 mm. On day 1, Doppler examination revealed RAO in 54 patients (32.9%). After 6 months, RAO was detected in 49 patients (29.9%). Interestingly, only 1 new case (0.9%) of RAO was noted, and 6 patients (11.1%) had regained their RA patency. On multivariate analysis, female gender, age, manual compression, and RA diameter emerged as independent predictors of RAO. Using TR band for hemostasis for only 2 h was recognized as a potent independent predictor of RA patency on day 1 and 6 months after the procedure (n = 2, 3.7% in the RAO group, vs. n = 23, 20.9% in the non-RAO group, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: RAO, although clinically a silent issue, has been the main complication following TRA. In patients with high predictors of RAO, careful management and close follow-up are required to ensure radial artery long-term patency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6821412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68214122019-11-14 Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization Sadaka, Mohamed A. Etman, Waleed Ahmed, Walid Kandil, Saeed Eltahan, Salah Egypt Heart J Research BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is considered the most common and devastating complication of transradial approach (TRA). It has been described as the “Achilles’ heel” of the transradial technique. Our aim was to assess the incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization. RESULTS: This was a prospective study enrolling 164 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) via the transradial approach (TRA) using 6-F catheters. Doppler ultrasonography assessment of the radial artery (RA) was conducted on day 1 and 6 months following the procedure. The studied group included 104 male (63.4%) and 60 female (36.6%) patients with a mean age of 57.7 ± 8.8 years and a mean RA diameter of 2.8 ± 0.5 mm. On day 1, Doppler examination revealed RAO in 54 patients (32.9%). After 6 months, RAO was detected in 49 patients (29.9%). Interestingly, only 1 new case (0.9%) of RAO was noted, and 6 patients (11.1%) had regained their RA patency. On multivariate analysis, female gender, age, manual compression, and RA diameter emerged as independent predictors of RAO. Using TR band for hemostasis for only 2 h was recognized as a potent independent predictor of RA patency on day 1 and 6 months after the procedure (n = 2, 3.7% in the RAO group, vs. n = 23, 20.9% in the non-RAO group, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: RAO, although clinically a silent issue, has been the main complication following TRA. In patients with high predictors of RAO, careful management and close follow-up are required to ensure radial artery long-term patency. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6821412/ /pubmed/31659526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0008-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Sadaka, Mohamed A.
Etman, Waleed
Ahmed, Walid
Kandil, Saeed
Eltahan, Salah
Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
title Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
title_full Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
title_fullStr Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
title_short Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
title_sort incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0008-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sadakamohameda incidenceandpredictorsofradialarteryocclusionaftertransradialcoronarycatheterization
AT etmanwaleed incidenceandpredictorsofradialarteryocclusionaftertransradialcoronarycatheterization
AT ahmedwalid incidenceandpredictorsofradialarteryocclusionaftertransradialcoronarycatheterization
AT kandilsaeed incidenceandpredictorsofradialarteryocclusionaftertransradialcoronarycatheterization
AT eltahansalah incidenceandpredictorsofradialarteryocclusionaftertransradialcoronarycatheterization