Cargando…

Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%

Intact tropical forests, free from substantial anthropogenic influence, store and sequester large amounts of atmospheric carbon but are currently neglected in international climate policy. We show that between 2000 and 2013, direct clearance of intact tropical forest areas accounted for 3.2% of gros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maxwell, Sean L., Evans, Tom, Watson, James E. M., Morel, Alexandra, Grantham, Hedley, Duncan, Adam, Harris, Nancy, Potapov, Peter, Runting, Rebecca K., Venter, Oscar, Wang, Stephanie, Malhi, Yadvinder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax2546
_version_ 1783464145801183232
author Maxwell, Sean L.
Evans, Tom
Watson, James E. M.
Morel, Alexandra
Grantham, Hedley
Duncan, Adam
Harris, Nancy
Potapov, Peter
Runting, Rebecca K.
Venter, Oscar
Wang, Stephanie
Malhi, Yadvinder
author_facet Maxwell, Sean L.
Evans, Tom
Watson, James E. M.
Morel, Alexandra
Grantham, Hedley
Duncan, Adam
Harris, Nancy
Potapov, Peter
Runting, Rebecca K.
Venter, Oscar
Wang, Stephanie
Malhi, Yadvinder
author_sort Maxwell, Sean L.
collection PubMed
description Intact tropical forests, free from substantial anthropogenic influence, store and sequester large amounts of atmospheric carbon but are currently neglected in international climate policy. We show that between 2000 and 2013, direct clearance of intact tropical forest areas accounted for 3.2% of gross carbon emissions from all deforestation across the pantropics. However, full carbon accounting requires the consideration of forgone carbon sequestration, selective logging, edge effects, and defaunation. When these factors were considered, the net carbon impact resulting from intact tropical forest loss between 2000 and 2013 increased by a factor of 6 (626%), from 0.34 (0.37 to 0.21) to 2.12 (2.85 to 1.00) petagrams of carbon (equivalent to approximately 2 years of global land use change emissions). The climate mitigation value of conserving the 549 million ha of tropical forest that remains intact is therefore significant but will soon dwindle if their rate of loss continues to accelerate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6821461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68214612019-11-05 Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626% Maxwell, Sean L. Evans, Tom Watson, James E. M. Morel, Alexandra Grantham, Hedley Duncan, Adam Harris, Nancy Potapov, Peter Runting, Rebecca K. Venter, Oscar Wang, Stephanie Malhi, Yadvinder Sci Adv Research Articles Intact tropical forests, free from substantial anthropogenic influence, store and sequester large amounts of atmospheric carbon but are currently neglected in international climate policy. We show that between 2000 and 2013, direct clearance of intact tropical forest areas accounted for 3.2% of gross carbon emissions from all deforestation across the pantropics. However, full carbon accounting requires the consideration of forgone carbon sequestration, selective logging, edge effects, and defaunation. When these factors were considered, the net carbon impact resulting from intact tropical forest loss between 2000 and 2013 increased by a factor of 6 (626%), from 0.34 (0.37 to 0.21) to 2.12 (2.85 to 1.00) petagrams of carbon (equivalent to approximately 2 years of global land use change emissions). The climate mitigation value of conserving the 549 million ha of tropical forest that remains intact is therefore significant but will soon dwindle if their rate of loss continues to accelerate. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2019-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6821461/ /pubmed/31692892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax2546 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Maxwell, Sean L.
Evans, Tom
Watson, James E. M.
Morel, Alexandra
Grantham, Hedley
Duncan, Adam
Harris, Nancy
Potapov, Peter
Runting, Rebecca K.
Venter, Oscar
Wang, Stephanie
Malhi, Yadvinder
Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
title Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
title_full Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
title_fullStr Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
title_full_unstemmed Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
title_short Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
title_sort degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax2546
work_keys_str_mv AT maxwellseanl degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT evanstom degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT watsonjamesem degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT morelalexandra degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT granthamhedley degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT duncanadam degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT harrisnancy degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT potapovpeter degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT runtingrebeccak degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT venteroscar degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT wangstephanie degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626
AT malhiyadvinder degradationandforgoneremovalsincreasethecarbonimpactofintactforestlossby626