Cargando…
Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay
Bentonite clay is an integral component of the engineered barrier system of deep geological repositories (DGRs) that are planned for the long-term storage of high-level radioactive waste. Although nucleic acid extraction and analysis can provide powerful qualitative and quantitative data reflecting...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00334-19 |
_version_ | 1783464233726377984 |
---|---|
author | Engel, Katja Coyotzi, Sara Vachon, Melody A. McKelvie, Jennifer R. Neufeld, Josh D. |
author_facet | Engel, Katja Coyotzi, Sara Vachon, Melody A. McKelvie, Jennifer R. Neufeld, Josh D. |
author_sort | Engel, Katja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bentonite clay is an integral component of the engineered barrier system of deep geological repositories (DGRs) that are planned for the long-term storage of high-level radioactive waste. Although nucleic acid extraction and analysis can provide powerful qualitative and quantitative data reflecting the presence, abundance, and functional potential of microorganisms within DGR materials, extraction of microbial DNA from bentonite clay is challenging due to the low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acids to the charged clay matrix. In this study, we used quantitative PCR, gel fingerprinting, and high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons to assess DNA extraction efficiency from natural MX-80 bentonite and the same material “spiked” with Escherichia coli genomic DNA. Extraction protocols were tested without additives and with casein and phosphate as blocking agents. Although we demonstrate improved DNA recovery by blocking agents at relatively high DNA spiking concentrations, at relatively low spiking concentrations, we detected a high proportion of contaminant nucleic acids from blocking agents that masked sample-specific microbial profile data. Because bacterial genomic DNA associated with casein preparations was insufficiently removed by UV treatment, casein is not recommended as an additive for DNA extractions from low-biomass samples. Instead, we recommend a kit-based extraction protocol for bentonite clay without additional blocking agents, as tested here and validated with multiple MX-80 bentonite samples, ensuring relatively high DNA recoveries with minimal contamination. IMPORTANCE Extraction of microbial DNA from MX-80 bentonite is challenging due to low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acid molecules to the charged clay matrix. Blocking agents improve DNA recovery, but their impact on microbial community profiles from low-biomass samples has not been characterized well. In this study, we evaluated the effect of casein and phosphate as blocking agents for quantitative recovery of nucleic acids from MX-80 bentonite. Our data justify a simplified framework for analyzing microbial community DNA associated with swelling MX-80 bentonite samples within the context of a deep geological repository for used nuclear fuel. This study is among the first to demonstrate successful extraction of DNA from Wyoming MX-80 bentonite. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6821930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68219302019-11-08 Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay Engel, Katja Coyotzi, Sara Vachon, Melody A. McKelvie, Jennifer R. Neufeld, Josh D. mSphere Research Article Bentonite clay is an integral component of the engineered barrier system of deep geological repositories (DGRs) that are planned for the long-term storage of high-level radioactive waste. Although nucleic acid extraction and analysis can provide powerful qualitative and quantitative data reflecting the presence, abundance, and functional potential of microorganisms within DGR materials, extraction of microbial DNA from bentonite clay is challenging due to the low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acids to the charged clay matrix. In this study, we used quantitative PCR, gel fingerprinting, and high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons to assess DNA extraction efficiency from natural MX-80 bentonite and the same material “spiked” with Escherichia coli genomic DNA. Extraction protocols were tested without additives and with casein and phosphate as blocking agents. Although we demonstrate improved DNA recovery by blocking agents at relatively high DNA spiking concentrations, at relatively low spiking concentrations, we detected a high proportion of contaminant nucleic acids from blocking agents that masked sample-specific microbial profile data. Because bacterial genomic DNA associated with casein preparations was insufficiently removed by UV treatment, casein is not recommended as an additive for DNA extractions from low-biomass samples. Instead, we recommend a kit-based extraction protocol for bentonite clay without additional blocking agents, as tested here and validated with multiple MX-80 bentonite samples, ensuring relatively high DNA recoveries with minimal contamination. IMPORTANCE Extraction of microbial DNA from MX-80 bentonite is challenging due to low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acid molecules to the charged clay matrix. Blocking agents improve DNA recovery, but their impact on microbial community profiles from low-biomass samples has not been characterized well. In this study, we evaluated the effect of casein and phosphate as blocking agents for quantitative recovery of nucleic acids from MX-80 bentonite. Our data justify a simplified framework for analyzing microbial community DNA associated with swelling MX-80 bentonite samples within the context of a deep geological repository for used nuclear fuel. This study is among the first to demonstrate successful extraction of DNA from Wyoming MX-80 bentonite. American Society for Microbiology 2019-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6821930/ /pubmed/31666313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00334-19 Text en Copyright © 2019 Engel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Engel, Katja Coyotzi, Sara Vachon, Melody A. McKelvie, Jennifer R. Neufeld, Josh D. Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay |
title | Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay |
title_full | Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay |
title_fullStr | Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay |
title_full_unstemmed | Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay |
title_short | Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay |
title_sort | validating dna extraction protocols for bentonite clay |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6821930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00334-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engelkatja validatingdnaextractionprotocolsforbentoniteclay AT coyotzisara validatingdnaextractionprotocolsforbentoniteclay AT vachonmelodya validatingdnaextractionprotocolsforbentoniteclay AT mckelviejenniferr validatingdnaextractionprotocolsforbentoniteclay AT neufeldjoshd validatingdnaextractionprotocolsforbentoniteclay |