Cargando…

Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”

Measures of reproductive output in turtles are generally positively correlated with female body size. However, a full understanding of reproductive allometry in turtles requires logarithmic transformation of reproductive and body size variables prior to regression analyses. This allows for slope com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iverson, John B., Lindeman, Peter V., Lovich, Jeffrey E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5697
_version_ 1783464254612963328
author Iverson, John B.
Lindeman, Peter V.
Lovich, Jeffrey E.
author_facet Iverson, John B.
Lindeman, Peter V.
Lovich, Jeffrey E.
author_sort Iverson, John B.
collection PubMed
description Measures of reproductive output in turtles are generally positively correlated with female body size. However, a full understanding of reproductive allometry in turtles requires logarithmic transformation of reproductive and body size variables prior to regression analyses. This allows for slope comparisons with expected linear or cubic relationships for linear to linear and linear to volumetric variables, respectively. We compiled scaling data using this approach from published and unpublished turtle studies (46 populations of 25 species from eight families) to quantify patterns among taxa. Our results suggest that for log–log comparisons of clutch size, egg width, egg mass, clutch mass, and pelvic aperture width to shell length, all scale hypoallometrically despite theoretical predictions of isometry. Clutch size generally scaled at ~1.7 to 2.0 (compared to an isometric expectation of 3.0), egg width at ~0.5 (compared to an expectation of 1.0), egg mass at ~1.1 to 1.3 (3.0), clutch mass at ~2.5 to 2.8 (3.0), and pelvic aperture width at 0.8–0.9 (1.0). We also found preliminary evidence that scaling may differ across years and clutches even in the same population, as well as across populations of the same species. Future investigators should aspire to collect data on all these reproductive parameters and to report log–log allometric analyses to test our preliminary conclusions regarding reproductive allometry in turtles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68220332019-11-06 Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” Iverson, John B. Lindeman, Peter V. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Ecol Evol Original Research Measures of reproductive output in turtles are generally positively correlated with female body size. However, a full understanding of reproductive allometry in turtles requires logarithmic transformation of reproductive and body size variables prior to regression analyses. This allows for slope comparisons with expected linear or cubic relationships for linear to linear and linear to volumetric variables, respectively. We compiled scaling data using this approach from published and unpublished turtle studies (46 populations of 25 species from eight families) to quantify patterns among taxa. Our results suggest that for log–log comparisons of clutch size, egg width, egg mass, clutch mass, and pelvic aperture width to shell length, all scale hypoallometrically despite theoretical predictions of isometry. Clutch size generally scaled at ~1.7 to 2.0 (compared to an isometric expectation of 3.0), egg width at ~0.5 (compared to an expectation of 1.0), egg mass at ~1.1 to 1.3 (3.0), clutch mass at ~2.5 to 2.8 (3.0), and pelvic aperture width at 0.8–0.9 (1.0). We also found preliminary evidence that scaling may differ across years and clutches even in the same population, as well as across populations of the same species. Future investigators should aspire to collect data on all these reproductive parameters and to report log–log allometric analyses to test our preliminary conclusions regarding reproductive allometry in turtles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6822033/ /pubmed/31695895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5697 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Iverson, John B.
Lindeman, Peter V.
Lovich, Jeffrey E.
Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”
title Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”
title_full Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”
title_fullStr Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”
title_full_unstemmed Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”
title_short Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”
title_sort understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: a slippery “slope”
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5697
work_keys_str_mv AT iversonjohnb understandingreproductiveallometryinturtlesaslipperyslope
AT lindemanpeterv understandingreproductiveallometryinturtlesaslipperyslope
AT lovichjeffreye understandingreproductiveallometryinturtlesaslipperyslope