Cargando…
Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope”
Measures of reproductive output in turtles are generally positively correlated with female body size. However, a full understanding of reproductive allometry in turtles requires logarithmic transformation of reproductive and body size variables prior to regression analyses. This allows for slope com...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5697 |
_version_ | 1783464254612963328 |
---|---|
author | Iverson, John B. Lindeman, Peter V. Lovich, Jeffrey E. |
author_facet | Iverson, John B. Lindeman, Peter V. Lovich, Jeffrey E. |
author_sort | Iverson, John B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measures of reproductive output in turtles are generally positively correlated with female body size. However, a full understanding of reproductive allometry in turtles requires logarithmic transformation of reproductive and body size variables prior to regression analyses. This allows for slope comparisons with expected linear or cubic relationships for linear to linear and linear to volumetric variables, respectively. We compiled scaling data using this approach from published and unpublished turtle studies (46 populations of 25 species from eight families) to quantify patterns among taxa. Our results suggest that for log–log comparisons of clutch size, egg width, egg mass, clutch mass, and pelvic aperture width to shell length, all scale hypoallometrically despite theoretical predictions of isometry. Clutch size generally scaled at ~1.7 to 2.0 (compared to an isometric expectation of 3.0), egg width at ~0.5 (compared to an expectation of 1.0), egg mass at ~1.1 to 1.3 (3.0), clutch mass at ~2.5 to 2.8 (3.0), and pelvic aperture width at 0.8–0.9 (1.0). We also found preliminary evidence that scaling may differ across years and clutches even in the same population, as well as across populations of the same species. Future investigators should aspire to collect data on all these reproductive parameters and to report log–log allometric analyses to test our preliminary conclusions regarding reproductive allometry in turtles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6822033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68220332019-11-06 Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” Iverson, John B. Lindeman, Peter V. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Ecol Evol Original Research Measures of reproductive output in turtles are generally positively correlated with female body size. However, a full understanding of reproductive allometry in turtles requires logarithmic transformation of reproductive and body size variables prior to regression analyses. This allows for slope comparisons with expected linear or cubic relationships for linear to linear and linear to volumetric variables, respectively. We compiled scaling data using this approach from published and unpublished turtle studies (46 populations of 25 species from eight families) to quantify patterns among taxa. Our results suggest that for log–log comparisons of clutch size, egg width, egg mass, clutch mass, and pelvic aperture width to shell length, all scale hypoallometrically despite theoretical predictions of isometry. Clutch size generally scaled at ~1.7 to 2.0 (compared to an isometric expectation of 3.0), egg width at ~0.5 (compared to an expectation of 1.0), egg mass at ~1.1 to 1.3 (3.0), clutch mass at ~2.5 to 2.8 (3.0), and pelvic aperture width at 0.8–0.9 (1.0). We also found preliminary evidence that scaling may differ across years and clutches even in the same population, as well as across populations of the same species. Future investigators should aspire to collect data on all these reproductive parameters and to report log–log allometric analyses to test our preliminary conclusions regarding reproductive allometry in turtles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6822033/ /pubmed/31695895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5697 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Iverson, John B. Lindeman, Peter V. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” |
title | Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” |
title_full | Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” |
title_fullStr | Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” |
title_short | Understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: A slippery “slope” |
title_sort | understanding reproductive allometry in turtles: a slippery “slope” |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iversonjohnb understandingreproductiveallometryinturtlesaslipperyslope AT lindemanpeterv understandingreproductiveallometryinturtlesaslipperyslope AT lovichjeffreye understandingreproductiveallometryinturtlesaslipperyslope |