Cargando…

Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial

1. Decreasing costs in high‐quality digital cameras, image processing, and digital storage allow researchers to generate and store massive amounts of digital imagery. The time needed to manually analyze these images will always be a limiting factor for experimental design and analysis. Implementatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simons, Elizabeth S., Hinders, Mark K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5695
_version_ 1783464256870547456
author Simons, Elizabeth S.
Hinders, Mark K.
author_facet Simons, Elizabeth S.
Hinders, Mark K.
author_sort Simons, Elizabeth S.
collection PubMed
description 1. Decreasing costs in high‐quality digital cameras, image processing, and digital storage allow researchers to generate and store massive amounts of digital imagery. The time needed to manually analyze these images will always be a limiting factor for experimental design and analysis. Implementation of computer vision algorithms for automating the detection and counting of animals reduces the manpower needed to analyze field images. 2. For this paper, we assess the ability of computer vision to detect and count birds in images from a field test that was not designed for computer vision. Using video stills from the field test and Matlab's Computer Vision Toolbox, we designed and evaluated a cascade object detection method employing Haar and Local Binary Pattern feature types. 3. Without editing the images, we found that the Haar feature can have a recall over 0.5 with an Intersection over Union threshold of 0.5. However, using this feature, 86% of the frames without birds had false‐positive bird detections. Reducing the false positives could lead to these detection methods being implemented into a fully automated system for detecting and counting birds. 4. Accurately detecting and counting birds using computer vision will reduce manpower for field experiments, both in experimental design and data analysis. Improvements in automated detection and counting will allow researchers to design extended trials without the added step of optimizing the experimental setup and/or captured images for computer vision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68220422019-11-06 Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial Simons, Elizabeth S. Hinders, Mark K. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Decreasing costs in high‐quality digital cameras, image processing, and digital storage allow researchers to generate and store massive amounts of digital imagery. The time needed to manually analyze these images will always be a limiting factor for experimental design and analysis. Implementation of computer vision algorithms for automating the detection and counting of animals reduces the manpower needed to analyze field images. 2. For this paper, we assess the ability of computer vision to detect and count birds in images from a field test that was not designed for computer vision. Using video stills from the field test and Matlab's Computer Vision Toolbox, we designed and evaluated a cascade object detection method employing Haar and Local Binary Pattern feature types. 3. Without editing the images, we found that the Haar feature can have a recall over 0.5 with an Intersection over Union threshold of 0.5. However, using this feature, 86% of the frames without birds had false‐positive bird detections. Reducing the false positives could lead to these detection methods being implemented into a fully automated system for detecting and counting birds. 4. Accurately detecting and counting birds using computer vision will reduce manpower for field experiments, both in experimental design and data analysis. Improvements in automated detection and counting will allow researchers to design extended trials without the added step of optimizing the experimental setup and/or captured images for computer vision. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6822042/ /pubmed/31695894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5695 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Simons, Elizabeth S.
Hinders, Mark K.
Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial
title Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial
title_full Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial
title_fullStr Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial
title_full_unstemmed Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial
title_short Automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial
title_sort automatic counting of birds in a bird deterrence field trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5695
work_keys_str_mv AT simonselizabeths automaticcountingofbirdsinabirddeterrencefieldtrial
AT hindersmarkk automaticcountingofbirdsinabirddeterrencefieldtrial