Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Mixed partial thickness burns are the most common depth of burn injury managed at a large Australian paediatric hospital specialty burns unit. Prolonged time until re-epithelialisation is associated with increased burn depth and scar formation. Whilst current wound management approaches...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bairagi, Anjana, Griffin, Bronwyn, Tyack, Zephanie, Vagenas, Dimitrios, McPhail, Steven M., Kimble, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0165-0
_version_ 1783464321426128896
author Bairagi, Anjana
Griffin, Bronwyn
Tyack, Zephanie
Vagenas, Dimitrios
McPhail, Steven M.
Kimble, Roy
author_facet Bairagi, Anjana
Griffin, Bronwyn
Tyack, Zephanie
Vagenas, Dimitrios
McPhail, Steven M.
Kimble, Roy
author_sort Bairagi, Anjana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mixed partial thickness burns are the most common depth of burn injury managed at a large Australian paediatric hospital specialty burns unit. Prolonged time until re-epithelialisation is associated with increased burn depth and scar formation. Whilst current wound management approaches have benefits such as anti-microbial cover, these are not without inherent limitations including multiple dressing changes. The Biobrane® RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings (BRACS) trial aims to identify the most effective wound management approach for mixed partial thickness injuries in children. METHODS: All children presenting with an acute burn injury to the study site will be screened for eligibility. This is a single-centre, three-arm, parallel group, randomised trial. Children younger than 16 years, with burns ≥ 5% total body surface area involving any anatomical location, up to 48 h after the burn injury, and of a superficial partial to mid-dermal depth, will be included. A sample size of 84 participants will be randomised to standard silver dressing or a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension (RES™) with Biobrane® or Biobrane® alone. The first dressing will be applied under general anaesthesia and subsequent dressings will be changed every 3 to 5 days until the wound is ≥ 95% re-epithelialised, with re-epithelialisation time the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes of acute pain, acute itch, scar severity, health-related quality of life, treatment satisfaction, dressing application ease and healthcare resource use will be assessed at each dressing change and 3, 6 and 12 months post-burn injury. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study can potentially change the wound management approach for superficial partial to mid-dermal burns in children locally and worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000245291) approved prospective registration on 15 February 2018. Registration details can be viewed at https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374272&isReview=true.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68223672019-11-06 Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol Bairagi, Anjana Griffin, Bronwyn Tyack, Zephanie Vagenas, Dimitrios McPhail, Steven M. Kimble, Roy Burns Trauma Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Mixed partial thickness burns are the most common depth of burn injury managed at a large Australian paediatric hospital specialty burns unit. Prolonged time until re-epithelialisation is associated with increased burn depth and scar formation. Whilst current wound management approaches have benefits such as anti-microbial cover, these are not without inherent limitations including multiple dressing changes. The Biobrane® RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings (BRACS) trial aims to identify the most effective wound management approach for mixed partial thickness injuries in children. METHODS: All children presenting with an acute burn injury to the study site will be screened for eligibility. This is a single-centre, three-arm, parallel group, randomised trial. Children younger than 16 years, with burns ≥ 5% total body surface area involving any anatomical location, up to 48 h after the burn injury, and of a superficial partial to mid-dermal depth, will be included. A sample size of 84 participants will be randomised to standard silver dressing or a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension (RES™) with Biobrane® or Biobrane® alone. The first dressing will be applied under general anaesthesia and subsequent dressings will be changed every 3 to 5 days until the wound is ≥ 95% re-epithelialised, with re-epithelialisation time the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes of acute pain, acute itch, scar severity, health-related quality of life, treatment satisfaction, dressing application ease and healthcare resource use will be assessed at each dressing change and 3, 6 and 12 months post-burn injury. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study can potentially change the wound management approach for superficial partial to mid-dermal burns in children locally and worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000245291) approved prospective registration on 15 February 2018. Registration details can be viewed at https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374272&isReview=true. BioMed Central 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6822367/ /pubmed/31696127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0165-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bairagi, Anjana
Griffin, Bronwyn
Tyack, Zephanie
Vagenas, Dimitrios
McPhail, Steven M.
Kimble, Roy
Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol
title Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol
title_full Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol
title_short Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol
title_sort comparative effectiveness of biobrane®, recell® autologous skin cell suspension and silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: bracs randomised trial protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0165-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bairagianjana comparativeeffectivenessofbiobranerecellautologousskincellsuspensionandsilverdressingsinpartialthicknesspaediatricburnsbracsrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT griffinbronwyn comparativeeffectivenessofbiobranerecellautologousskincellsuspensionandsilverdressingsinpartialthicknesspaediatricburnsbracsrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT tyackzephanie comparativeeffectivenessofbiobranerecellautologousskincellsuspensionandsilverdressingsinpartialthicknesspaediatricburnsbracsrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT vagenasdimitrios comparativeeffectivenessofbiobranerecellautologousskincellsuspensionandsilverdressingsinpartialthicknesspaediatricburnsbracsrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT mcphailstevenm comparativeeffectivenessofbiobranerecellautologousskincellsuspensionandsilverdressingsinpartialthicknesspaediatricburnsbracsrandomisedtrialprotocol
AT kimbleroy comparativeeffectivenessofbiobranerecellautologousskincellsuspensionandsilverdressingsinpartialthicknesspaediatricburnsbracsrandomisedtrialprotocol