Cargando…

Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense

BACKGROUND: Position sense is commonly impaired after stroke. Traditional rehabilitation methods instruct patients to visualize their limbs to compensate for impaired position sense. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate how the use of vision influences impaired position sense. METHODS: We examined 17...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herter, Troy M., Scott, Stephen H., Dukelow, Sean P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0596-7
_version_ 1783464331992629248
author Herter, Troy M.
Scott, Stephen H.
Dukelow, Sean P.
author_facet Herter, Troy M.
Scott, Stephen H.
Dukelow, Sean P.
author_sort Herter, Troy M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Position sense is commonly impaired after stroke. Traditional rehabilitation methods instruct patients to visualize their limbs to compensate for impaired position sense. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate how the use of vision influences impaired position sense. METHODS: We examined 177 stroke survivors, an average of 12.7 days (+/− 10 days (SD)) post-stroke, and 133 neurologically-intact controls with a robotic assessment of position sense. The robot positioned one limb (affected) and subjects attempted to mirror-match the position using the opposite limb (unaffected). Subjects completed the test without, then with vision of their limbs. We examined three measures of position sense: variability (Var), contraction/expansion (C/E) and systematic shift (Shift). We classified stroke survivors as having full compensation if they performed the robotic task abnormally without vision but corrected performance within the range of normal with vision. Stroke survivors were deemed to have partial compensation if they performed the task outside the range of normal without and with vision, but improved significantly with vision. Those with absent compensation performed the task abnormally in both conditions and did not improve with vision. RESULTS: Many stroke survivors demonstrated impaired position sense with vision occluded [Var: 116 (66%), C/E: 91 (51%), Shift: 52 (29%)]. Of those stroke survivors with impaired position sense, some exhibited full compensation with vision [Var: 23 (20%), C/E: 42 (46%), Shift: 32 (62%)], others showed partial compensation [Var: 37 (32%), C/E: 8 (9%), Shift: 3 (6%)] and many displayed absent compensation (Var: 56 (48%), C/E: 41 (45%), Shift: 17 (33%)]. Stroke survivors with an affected left arm, visuospatial neglect and/or visual field defects were less likely to compensate for impaired position sense using vision. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that vision does not help many stroke survivors compensate for impaired position sense, at least within the current paradigm. This contrasts with historical reports that vision helps compensate for proprioceptive loss following neurologic injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68224222019-11-06 Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense Herter, Troy M. Scott, Stephen H. Dukelow, Sean P. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Position sense is commonly impaired after stroke. Traditional rehabilitation methods instruct patients to visualize their limbs to compensate for impaired position sense. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate how the use of vision influences impaired position sense. METHODS: We examined 177 stroke survivors, an average of 12.7 days (+/− 10 days (SD)) post-stroke, and 133 neurologically-intact controls with a robotic assessment of position sense. The robot positioned one limb (affected) and subjects attempted to mirror-match the position using the opposite limb (unaffected). Subjects completed the test without, then with vision of their limbs. We examined three measures of position sense: variability (Var), contraction/expansion (C/E) and systematic shift (Shift). We classified stroke survivors as having full compensation if they performed the robotic task abnormally without vision but corrected performance within the range of normal with vision. Stroke survivors were deemed to have partial compensation if they performed the task outside the range of normal without and with vision, but improved significantly with vision. Those with absent compensation performed the task abnormally in both conditions and did not improve with vision. RESULTS: Many stroke survivors demonstrated impaired position sense with vision occluded [Var: 116 (66%), C/E: 91 (51%), Shift: 52 (29%)]. Of those stroke survivors with impaired position sense, some exhibited full compensation with vision [Var: 23 (20%), C/E: 42 (46%), Shift: 32 (62%)], others showed partial compensation [Var: 37 (32%), C/E: 8 (9%), Shift: 3 (6%)] and many displayed absent compensation (Var: 56 (48%), C/E: 41 (45%), Shift: 17 (33%)]. Stroke survivors with an affected left arm, visuospatial neglect and/or visual field defects were less likely to compensate for impaired position sense using vision. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that vision does not help many stroke survivors compensate for impaired position sense, at least within the current paradigm. This contrasts with historical reports that vision helps compensate for proprioceptive loss following neurologic injuries. BioMed Central 2019-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6822422/ /pubmed/31666135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0596-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Herter, Troy M.
Scott, Stephen H.
Dukelow, Sean P.
Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense
title Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense
title_full Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense
title_fullStr Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense
title_full_unstemmed Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense
title_short Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense
title_sort vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0596-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hertertroym visiondoesnotalwayshelpstrokesurvivorscompensateforimpairedlimbpositionsense
AT scottstephenh visiondoesnotalwayshelpstrokesurvivorscompensateforimpairedlimbpositionsense
AT dukelowseanp visiondoesnotalwayshelpstrokesurvivorscompensateforimpairedlimbpositionsense