Cargando…
The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal
BACKGROUND: Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, was approved for the prevention of episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) at the monthly dose of 70 mg or 140 mg. We reviewed the available literature to understand if patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1054-4 |
_version_ | 1783464336308568064 |
---|---|
author | Ornello, Raffaele Tiseo, Cindy Frattale, Ilaria Perrotta, Giulia Marini, Carmine Pistoia, Francesca Sacco, Simona |
author_facet | Ornello, Raffaele Tiseo, Cindy Frattale, Ilaria Perrotta, Giulia Marini, Carmine Pistoia, Francesca Sacco, Simona |
author_sort | Ornello, Raffaele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, was approved for the prevention of episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) at the monthly dose of 70 mg or 140 mg. We reviewed the available literature to understand if patients with prior preventive treatment failures benefit more from the 140 mg dose than the 70 mg. MAIN BODY: We searched papers indexed in PubMed and conference abstracts published in the last 2 years which assessed the safety and efficacy of erenumab in patients with prior preventive treatment failures. We reviewed the results of 3 randomized controlled trials and their subgroup analyses and open-label extensions. The 140 mg monthly dose of erenumab had a numerical advantage over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with prior preventive treatment failures, both in EM and CM (with or without medication overuse) during the double blind phases of the trials and their open-label extensions. The numerical difference between the two doses increased with the increase in the number of prior preventive treatment failures. CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggest that erenumab 140 mg monthly might be preferred over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with EM or CM and prior preventive treatment failures. Further data are needed to assess the long-term efficacy in clinical practice of the two doses of erenumab, while their safety profile is comparable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6822439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68224392019-11-06 The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal Ornello, Raffaele Tiseo, Cindy Frattale, Ilaria Perrotta, Giulia Marini, Carmine Pistoia, Francesca Sacco, Simona J Headache Pain Review Article BACKGROUND: Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, was approved for the prevention of episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) at the monthly dose of 70 mg or 140 mg. We reviewed the available literature to understand if patients with prior preventive treatment failures benefit more from the 140 mg dose than the 70 mg. MAIN BODY: We searched papers indexed in PubMed and conference abstracts published in the last 2 years which assessed the safety and efficacy of erenumab in patients with prior preventive treatment failures. We reviewed the results of 3 randomized controlled trials and their subgroup analyses and open-label extensions. The 140 mg monthly dose of erenumab had a numerical advantage over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with prior preventive treatment failures, both in EM and CM (with or without medication overuse) during the double blind phases of the trials and their open-label extensions. The numerical difference between the two doses increased with the increase in the number of prior preventive treatment failures. CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggest that erenumab 140 mg monthly might be preferred over the 70 mg monthly dose in patients with EM or CM and prior preventive treatment failures. Further data are needed to assess the long-term efficacy in clinical practice of the two doses of erenumab, while their safety profile is comparable. Springer Milan 2019-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6822439/ /pubmed/31666008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1054-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ornello, Raffaele Tiseo, Cindy Frattale, Ilaria Perrotta, Giulia Marini, Carmine Pistoia, Francesca Sacco, Simona The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal |
title | The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal |
title_full | The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal |
title_fullStr | The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal |
title_full_unstemmed | The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal |
title_short | The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal |
title_sort | appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1054-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ornelloraffaele theappropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT tiseocindy theappropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT frattaleilaria theappropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT perrottagiulia theappropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT marinicarmine theappropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT pistoiafrancesca theappropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT saccosimona theappropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT ornelloraffaele appropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT tiseocindy appropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT frattaleilaria appropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT perrottagiulia appropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT marinicarmine appropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT pistoiafrancesca appropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal AT saccosimona appropriatedosingoferenumabformigrainepreventionaftermultiplepreventivetreatmentfailuresacriticalappraisal |