Cargando…

Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach

Dancing and playing music require people to coordinate actions with auditory rhythms. In laboratory perception-action coordination tasks, people are asked to synchronize taps with a metronome. When synchronizing with a metronome, people tend to anticipate stimulus onsets, tapping slightly before the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roman, Iran R., Washburn, Auriel, Large, Edward W., Chafe, Chris, Fujioka, Takako
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007371
_version_ 1783464391648215040
author Roman, Iran R.
Washburn, Auriel
Large, Edward W.
Chafe, Chris
Fujioka, Takako
author_facet Roman, Iran R.
Washburn, Auriel
Large, Edward W.
Chafe, Chris
Fujioka, Takako
author_sort Roman, Iran R.
collection PubMed
description Dancing and playing music require people to coordinate actions with auditory rhythms. In laboratory perception-action coordination tasks, people are asked to synchronize taps with a metronome. When synchronizing with a metronome, people tend to anticipate stimulus onsets, tapping slightly before the stimulus. The anticipation tendency increases with longer stimulus periods of up to 3500ms, but is less pronounced in trained individuals like musicians compared to non-musicians. Furthermore, external factors influence the timing of tapping. These factors include the presence of auditory feedback from one’s own taps, the presence of a partner performing coordinated joint tapping, and transmission latencies (TLs) between coordinating partners. Phenomena like the anticipation tendency can be explained by delay-coupled systems, which may be inherent to the sensorimotor system during perception-action coordination. Here we tested whether a dynamical systems model based on this hypothesis reproduces observed patterns of human synchronization. We simulated behavior with a model consisting of an oscillator receiving its own delayed activity as input. Three simulation experiments were conducted using previously-published behavioral data from 1) simple tapping, 2) two-person alternating beat-tapping, and 3) two-person alternating rhythm-clapping in the presence of a range of constant auditory TLs. In Experiment 1, our model replicated the larger anticipation observed for longer stimulus intervals and adjusting the amplitude of the delayed feedback reproduced the difference between musicians and non-musicians. In Experiment 2, by connecting two models we replicated the smaller anticipation observed in human joint tapping with bi-directional auditory feedback compared to joint tapping without feedback. In Experiment 3, we varied TLs between two models alternately receiving signals from one another. Results showed reciprocal lags at points of alternation, consistent with behavioral patterns. Overall, our model explains various anticipatory behaviors, and has potential to inform theories of adaptive human synchronization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68227242019-11-08 Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach Roman, Iran R. Washburn, Auriel Large, Edward W. Chafe, Chris Fujioka, Takako PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Dancing and playing music require people to coordinate actions with auditory rhythms. In laboratory perception-action coordination tasks, people are asked to synchronize taps with a metronome. When synchronizing with a metronome, people tend to anticipate stimulus onsets, tapping slightly before the stimulus. The anticipation tendency increases with longer stimulus periods of up to 3500ms, but is less pronounced in trained individuals like musicians compared to non-musicians. Furthermore, external factors influence the timing of tapping. These factors include the presence of auditory feedback from one’s own taps, the presence of a partner performing coordinated joint tapping, and transmission latencies (TLs) between coordinating partners. Phenomena like the anticipation tendency can be explained by delay-coupled systems, which may be inherent to the sensorimotor system during perception-action coordination. Here we tested whether a dynamical systems model based on this hypothesis reproduces observed patterns of human synchronization. We simulated behavior with a model consisting of an oscillator receiving its own delayed activity as input. Three simulation experiments were conducted using previously-published behavioral data from 1) simple tapping, 2) two-person alternating beat-tapping, and 3) two-person alternating rhythm-clapping in the presence of a range of constant auditory TLs. In Experiment 1, our model replicated the larger anticipation observed for longer stimulus intervals and adjusting the amplitude of the delayed feedback reproduced the difference between musicians and non-musicians. In Experiment 2, by connecting two models we replicated the smaller anticipation observed in human joint tapping with bi-directional auditory feedback compared to joint tapping without feedback. In Experiment 3, we varied TLs between two models alternately receiving signals from one another. Results showed reciprocal lags at points of alternation, consistent with behavioral patterns. Overall, our model explains various anticipatory behaviors, and has potential to inform theories of adaptive human synchronization. Public Library of Science 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6822724/ /pubmed/31671096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007371 Text en © 2019 Roman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roman, Iran R.
Washburn, Auriel
Large, Edward W.
Chafe, Chris
Fujioka, Takako
Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach
title Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach
title_full Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach
title_fullStr Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach
title_full_unstemmed Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach
title_short Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach
title_sort delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: a dynamical systems approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007371
work_keys_str_mv AT romaniranr delayedfeedbackembeddedinperceptionactioncoordinationcyclesresultsinanticipationbehaviorduringsynchronizedrhythmicactionadynamicalsystemsapproach
AT washburnauriel delayedfeedbackembeddedinperceptionactioncoordinationcyclesresultsinanticipationbehaviorduringsynchronizedrhythmicactionadynamicalsystemsapproach
AT largeedwardw delayedfeedbackembeddedinperceptionactioncoordinationcyclesresultsinanticipationbehaviorduringsynchronizedrhythmicactionadynamicalsystemsapproach
AT chafechris delayedfeedbackembeddedinperceptionactioncoordinationcyclesresultsinanticipationbehaviorduringsynchronizedrhythmicactionadynamicalsystemsapproach
AT fujiokatakako delayedfeedbackembeddedinperceptionactioncoordinationcyclesresultsinanticipationbehaviorduringsynchronizedrhythmicactionadynamicalsystemsapproach