Cargando…

Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVE: Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are neonates born with birth weight below the 10(th) centile for a given week of pregnancy. It is a risk factor of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing debate whether prenatal detection of SGA neonates is good predictor of per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kajdy, Anna, Modzelewski, Jan, Jakubiak, Monika, Pokropek, Artur, Rabijewski, Michał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224553
_version_ 1783464397671235584
author Kajdy, Anna
Modzelewski, Jan
Jakubiak, Monika
Pokropek, Artur
Rabijewski, Michał
author_facet Kajdy, Anna
Modzelewski, Jan
Jakubiak, Monika
Pokropek, Artur
Rabijewski, Michał
author_sort Kajdy, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are neonates born with birth weight below the 10(th) centile for a given week of pregnancy. It is a risk factor of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing debate whether prenatal detection of SGA neonates is good predictor of perinatal outcome especially in low risk populations. Our primary aim was to compare the odds ratios for unfavorable outcome in a risk stratified cohort of SGA neonates in regard to prenatal detection status. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study analysing the effect of prenatal detection on perinatal outcome. This cohort has been divided into a predefined low-risk and high-risk population. Electronic records of 39,032 singleton deliveries from 2010 through 2016 were analysed. SGA was defined as newborn weight below the 10(th) percentile on the Fenton growth chart. Detected SGA (dSGA) neonates were those that were admitted for delivery with a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abnormal growth. Undetected SGA (uSGA) were neonates that were found to be below the 10(th) percentile after birth. Perinatal and neonatal outcome was compared. RESULTS: The detection rate in high-risk pregnancies was almost 45.7% versus low risk where it amounted to 18.9%. In both the high-risk and low-risk populations there was a significantly higher risk of composite mortality for undetected SGA compared to approporiate-for-gestational-age (AGA) (OR 7.95 CI 4.76–13.29; OR 14.4 CI 4.99–41.45 respectively). The odds for the composite neonatal outcome were significantly higher for dSGA and uSGA than for AGA in all the studied populations except for the uSGA in high risk population (OR 1.57 CI 0.97–3.53). Importantly, there was not a single case of intrauterine fetal death among detected SGA, in the low risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal detection of SGA status is related to perinatal outcomes, especially mortality. Therefore, assessment of SGA status even in low-risk pregnancies could help predict potential perinatal and neonatal complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68227492019-11-12 Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort Kajdy, Anna Modzelewski, Jan Jakubiak, Monika Pokropek, Artur Rabijewski, Michał PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are neonates born with birth weight below the 10(th) centile for a given week of pregnancy. It is a risk factor of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing debate whether prenatal detection of SGA neonates is good predictor of perinatal outcome especially in low risk populations. Our primary aim was to compare the odds ratios for unfavorable outcome in a risk stratified cohort of SGA neonates in regard to prenatal detection status. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study analysing the effect of prenatal detection on perinatal outcome. This cohort has been divided into a predefined low-risk and high-risk population. Electronic records of 39,032 singleton deliveries from 2010 through 2016 were analysed. SGA was defined as newborn weight below the 10(th) percentile on the Fenton growth chart. Detected SGA (dSGA) neonates were those that were admitted for delivery with a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abnormal growth. Undetected SGA (uSGA) were neonates that were found to be below the 10(th) percentile after birth. Perinatal and neonatal outcome was compared. RESULTS: The detection rate in high-risk pregnancies was almost 45.7% versus low risk where it amounted to 18.9%. In both the high-risk and low-risk populations there was a significantly higher risk of composite mortality for undetected SGA compared to approporiate-for-gestational-age (AGA) (OR 7.95 CI 4.76–13.29; OR 14.4 CI 4.99–41.45 respectively). The odds for the composite neonatal outcome were significantly higher for dSGA and uSGA than for AGA in all the studied populations except for the uSGA in high risk population (OR 1.57 CI 0.97–3.53). Importantly, there was not a single case of intrauterine fetal death among detected SGA, in the low risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal detection of SGA status is related to perinatal outcomes, especially mortality. Therefore, assessment of SGA status even in low-risk pregnancies could help predict potential perinatal and neonatal complications. Public Library of Science 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6822749/ /pubmed/31671164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224553 Text en © 2019 Kajdy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kajdy, Anna
Modzelewski, Jan
Jakubiak, Monika
Pokropek, Artur
Rabijewski, Michał
Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort
title Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort
title_full Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort
title_fullStr Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort
title_full_unstemmed Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort
title_short Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort
title_sort effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224553
work_keys_str_mv AT kajdyanna effectofantenataldetectionofsmallforgestationalagenewbornsinariskstratifiedretrospectivecohort
AT modzelewskijan effectofantenataldetectionofsmallforgestationalagenewbornsinariskstratifiedretrospectivecohort
AT jakubiakmonika effectofantenataldetectionofsmallforgestationalagenewbornsinariskstratifiedretrospectivecohort
AT pokropekartur effectofantenataldetectionofsmallforgestationalagenewbornsinariskstratifiedretrospectivecohort
AT rabijewskimichał effectofantenataldetectionofsmallforgestationalagenewbornsinariskstratifiedretrospectivecohort