Cargando…
Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA)
INTRODUCTION: Inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic effica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9 |
_version_ | 1783464406787555328 |
---|---|
author | Mercadante, Sebastiano Voza, Antonio Serra, Sossio Ruggiano, Germana Carpinteri, Giuseppe Gangitano, Gianfilippo Intelligente, Fabio Bonafede, Elisabetta Sblendido, Antonella Farina, Alberto Soldi, Amedeo Fabbri, Andrea |
author_facet | Mercadante, Sebastiano Voza, Antonio Serra, Sossio Ruggiano, Germana Carpinteri, Giuseppe Gangitano, Gianfilippo Intelligente, Fabio Bonafede, Elisabetta Sblendido, Antonella Farina, Alberto Soldi, Amedeo Fabbri, Andrea |
author_sort | Mercadante, Sebastiano |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment (SAT) for acute trauma pain. METHODS: This was a randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in 15 Italian emergency units. Adults with limb trauma and pain score ≥ 4 on numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane 3 mL or SAT [intravenously administered (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol 1 g or IV ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain (NRS 4–6)]. The primary endpoint was overall change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity from baseline (time of randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. Non-inferiority and superiority of methoxyflurane versus SAT were concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment comparison (methoxyflurane–SAT) was less than 1 and less than 0, respectively. RESULTS: Between 8 February 2018 and 8 February 2019, 272 patients were randomised (136 per treatment group). A total of 270 patients (mean age 51 years; 49% male; 34% with severe pain; mean baseline VAS 67 mm) were treated and analysed for efficacy and safety. Superiority of methoxyflurane was demonstrated for moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted mean treatment difference − 5.94 mm; 95% CI − 8.83, − 3.06 mm), moderate pain (− 5.97 mm; 95% CI − 9.55, − 2.39 mm) and severe pain (− 5.54 mm; 95% CI − 10.49, − 0.59 mm). Median onset of pain relief was 9 min for methoxyflurane and 15 min for SAT. Practicality of methoxyflurane treatment was rated “Excellent”, “Very Good” or “Good” by 90% of clinicians vs. 64% for SAT. Adverse events (all non-serious) were reported by 17% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and 3% of SAT-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane provided superior pain relief to SAT in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain and may offer a simple, fast, effective non-opioid treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered with EudraCT (2017-001565-25) on 2 March 2018 and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585374) on 13 July 2018. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6822789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68227892019-11-20 Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA) Mercadante, Sebastiano Voza, Antonio Serra, Sossio Ruggiano, Germana Carpinteri, Giuseppe Gangitano, Gianfilippo Intelligente, Fabio Bonafede, Elisabetta Sblendido, Antonella Farina, Alberto Soldi, Amedeo Fabbri, Andrea Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment (SAT) for acute trauma pain. METHODS: This was a randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in 15 Italian emergency units. Adults with limb trauma and pain score ≥ 4 on numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane 3 mL or SAT [intravenously administered (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol 1 g or IV ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain (NRS 4–6)]. The primary endpoint was overall change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity from baseline (time of randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. Non-inferiority and superiority of methoxyflurane versus SAT were concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment comparison (methoxyflurane–SAT) was less than 1 and less than 0, respectively. RESULTS: Between 8 February 2018 and 8 February 2019, 272 patients were randomised (136 per treatment group). A total of 270 patients (mean age 51 years; 49% male; 34% with severe pain; mean baseline VAS 67 mm) were treated and analysed for efficacy and safety. Superiority of methoxyflurane was demonstrated for moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted mean treatment difference − 5.94 mm; 95% CI − 8.83, − 3.06 mm), moderate pain (− 5.97 mm; 95% CI − 9.55, − 2.39 mm) and severe pain (− 5.54 mm; 95% CI − 10.49, − 0.59 mm). Median onset of pain relief was 9 min for methoxyflurane and 15 min for SAT. Practicality of methoxyflurane treatment was rated “Excellent”, “Very Good” or “Good” by 90% of clinicians vs. 64% for SAT. Adverse events (all non-serious) were reported by 17% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and 3% of SAT-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane provided superior pain relief to SAT in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain and may offer a simple, fast, effective non-opioid treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered with EudraCT (2017-001565-25) on 2 March 2018 and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585374) on 13 July 2018. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-10-12 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6822789/ /pubmed/31612359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mercadante, Sebastiano Voza, Antonio Serra, Sossio Ruggiano, Germana Carpinteri, Giuseppe Gangitano, Gianfilippo Intelligente, Fabio Bonafede, Elisabetta Sblendido, Antonella Farina, Alberto Soldi, Amedeo Fabbri, Andrea Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA) |
title | Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA) |
title_full | Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA) |
title_fullStr | Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA) |
title_short | Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA) |
title_sort | analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of inhaled methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment for acute trauma pain in the emergency setting: a randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre trial in italy (medita) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01055-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mercadantesebastiano analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT vozaantonio analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT serrasossio analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT ruggianogermana analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT carpinterigiuseppe analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT gangitanogianfilippo analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT intelligentefabio analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT bonafedeelisabetta analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT sblendidoantonella analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT farinaalberto analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT soldiamedeo analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT fabbriandrea analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita AT analgesicefficacypracticalityandsafetyofinhaledmethoxyfluraneversusstandardanalgesictreatmentforacutetraumapainintheemergencysettingarandomisedopenlabelactivecontrolledmulticentretrialinitalymedita |