Cargando…

The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia

INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists represent a class of treatments for type 2 diabetes that offer multifactorial benefits, including glycemic control, weight loss and low hypoglycemia risk. Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel GLP-1 analog that has been associated with imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malkin, Samuel J. P., Russel-Szymczyk, Monika, Psota, Marek, Hlavinkova, Lucia, Hunt, Barnaby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y
_version_ 1783464423625588736
author Malkin, Samuel J. P.
Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
Psota, Marek
Hlavinkova, Lucia
Hunt, Barnaby
author_facet Malkin, Samuel J. P.
Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
Psota, Marek
Hlavinkova, Lucia
Hunt, Barnaby
author_sort Malkin, Samuel J. P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists represent a class of treatments for type 2 diabetes that offer multifactorial benefits, including glycemic control, weight loss and low hypoglycemia risk. Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel GLP-1 analog that has been associated with improved glycemic control and reduced body mass index (BMI) versus once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in SUSTAIN 7, which is reimbursed in patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in Slovakia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Slovakia. METHODS: Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects were based on the sub-group of patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in SUSTAIN 7. Patients were modeled to receive once-weekly semaglutide or dulaglutide for 3 years, after which treatment was intensified to basal insulin. Treatment effects associated with once-weekly semaglutide and dulaglutide were maintained for the first 3 years before HbA1c increased to 7.0% and BMI reverted to baseline. Costs were accounted from a healthcare payer perspective in Slovakia and expressed in euros (EUR). Utilities relating to quality of life were taken from published sources. RESULTS: Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.04 and 0.07 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Lifetime medical costs were similar, with cost savings of EUR 20 and EUR 140 per patient with once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide were therefore considered dominant versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. CONCLUSION: Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide represent cost-saving treatment options versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg for obese patients with type 2 diabetes in Slovakia. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68228572019-11-06 The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia Malkin, Samuel J. P. Russel-Szymczyk, Monika Psota, Marek Hlavinkova, Lucia Hunt, Barnaby Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists represent a class of treatments for type 2 diabetes that offer multifactorial benefits, including glycemic control, weight loss and low hypoglycemia risk. Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel GLP-1 analog that has been associated with improved glycemic control and reduced body mass index (BMI) versus once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in SUSTAIN 7, which is reimbursed in patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in Slovakia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Slovakia. METHODS: Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects were based on the sub-group of patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in SUSTAIN 7. Patients were modeled to receive once-weekly semaglutide or dulaglutide for 3 years, after which treatment was intensified to basal insulin. Treatment effects associated with once-weekly semaglutide and dulaglutide were maintained for the first 3 years before HbA1c increased to 7.0% and BMI reverted to baseline. Costs were accounted from a healthcare payer perspective in Slovakia and expressed in euros (EUR). Utilities relating to quality of life were taken from published sources. RESULTS: Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.04 and 0.07 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Lifetime medical costs were similar, with cost savings of EUR 20 and EUR 140 per patient with once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide were therefore considered dominant versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. CONCLUSION: Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide represent cost-saving treatment options versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg for obese patients with type 2 diabetes in Slovakia. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. Springer Healthcare 2019-06-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6822857/ /pubmed/31168765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Malkin, Samuel J. P.
Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
Psota, Marek
Hlavinkova, Lucia
Hunt, Barnaby
The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia
title The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia
title_full The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia
title_fullStr The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia
title_full_unstemmed The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia
title_short The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia
title_sort management of type 2 diabetes with once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide: a long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in slovakia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y
work_keys_str_mv AT malkinsamueljp themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT russelszymczykmonika themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT psotamarek themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT hlavinkovalucia themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT huntbarnaby themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT malkinsamueljp managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT russelszymczykmonika managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT psotamarek managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT hlavinkovalucia managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia
AT huntbarnaby managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia