Cargando…
The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia
INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists represent a class of treatments for type 2 diabetes that offer multifactorial benefits, including glycemic control, weight loss and low hypoglycemia risk. Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel GLP-1 analog that has been associated with imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y |
_version_ | 1783464423625588736 |
---|---|
author | Malkin, Samuel J. P. Russel-Szymczyk, Monika Psota, Marek Hlavinkova, Lucia Hunt, Barnaby |
author_facet | Malkin, Samuel J. P. Russel-Szymczyk, Monika Psota, Marek Hlavinkova, Lucia Hunt, Barnaby |
author_sort | Malkin, Samuel J. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists represent a class of treatments for type 2 diabetes that offer multifactorial benefits, including glycemic control, weight loss and low hypoglycemia risk. Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel GLP-1 analog that has been associated with improved glycemic control and reduced body mass index (BMI) versus once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in SUSTAIN 7, which is reimbursed in patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in Slovakia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Slovakia. METHODS: Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects were based on the sub-group of patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in SUSTAIN 7. Patients were modeled to receive once-weekly semaglutide or dulaglutide for 3 years, after which treatment was intensified to basal insulin. Treatment effects associated with once-weekly semaglutide and dulaglutide were maintained for the first 3 years before HbA1c increased to 7.0% and BMI reverted to baseline. Costs were accounted from a healthcare payer perspective in Slovakia and expressed in euros (EUR). Utilities relating to quality of life were taken from published sources. RESULTS: Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.04 and 0.07 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Lifetime medical costs were similar, with cost savings of EUR 20 and EUR 140 per patient with once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide were therefore considered dominant versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. CONCLUSION: Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide represent cost-saving treatment options versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg for obese patients with type 2 diabetes in Slovakia. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6822857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68228572019-11-06 The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia Malkin, Samuel J. P. Russel-Szymczyk, Monika Psota, Marek Hlavinkova, Lucia Hunt, Barnaby Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists represent a class of treatments for type 2 diabetes that offer multifactorial benefits, including glycemic control, weight loss and low hypoglycemia risk. Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel GLP-1 analog that has been associated with improved glycemic control and reduced body mass index (BMI) versus once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in SUSTAIN 7, which is reimbursed in patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in Slovakia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Slovakia. METHODS: Clinical and cost outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects were based on the sub-group of patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m(2) in SUSTAIN 7. Patients were modeled to receive once-weekly semaglutide or dulaglutide for 3 years, after which treatment was intensified to basal insulin. Treatment effects associated with once-weekly semaglutide and dulaglutide were maintained for the first 3 years before HbA1c increased to 7.0% and BMI reverted to baseline. Costs were accounted from a healthcare payer perspective in Slovakia and expressed in euros (EUR). Utilities relating to quality of life were taken from published sources. RESULTS: Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.04 and 0.07 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Lifetime medical costs were similar, with cost savings of EUR 20 and EUR 140 per patient with once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively, versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide were therefore considered dominant versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. CONCLUSION: Both doses of once-weekly semaglutide represent cost-saving treatment options versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg for obese patients with type 2 diabetes in Slovakia. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. Springer Healthcare 2019-06-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6822857/ /pubmed/31168765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Malkin, Samuel J. P. Russel-Szymczyk, Monika Psota, Marek Hlavinkova, Lucia Hunt, Barnaby The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia |
title | The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia |
title_full | The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia |
title_fullStr | The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia |
title_full_unstemmed | The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia |
title_short | The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia |
title_sort | management of type 2 diabetes with once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide: a long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in slovakia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malkinsamueljp themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT russelszymczykmonika themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT psotamarek themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT hlavinkovalucia themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT huntbarnaby themanagementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT malkinsamueljp managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT russelszymczykmonika managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT psotamarek managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT hlavinkovalucia managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia AT huntbarnaby managementoftype2diabeteswithonceweeklysemaglutideversusdulaglutidealongtermcosteffectivenessanalysisinslovakia |