Cargando…

Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

INTRODUCTION: Patients’ adherence to and persistence on treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can vary, depending on type and distribution of disease and treatment modality. We aim to identify differences in adherence and persistence with treatments with different administration routes (int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moran, Kellyn, Null, Kyle, Huang, Zhongwen, Lissoos, Trevor, Kane, Sunanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01037-x
_version_ 1783464450373713920
author Moran, Kellyn
Null, Kyle
Huang, Zhongwen
Lissoos, Trevor
Kane, Sunanda
author_facet Moran, Kellyn
Null, Kyle
Huang, Zhongwen
Lissoos, Trevor
Kane, Sunanda
author_sort Moran, Kellyn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients’ adherence to and persistence on treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can vary, depending on type and distribution of disease and treatment modality. We aim to identify differences in adherence and persistence with treatments with different administration routes (intravenous vs oral) in IBD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of a claims database of adult patients diagnosed with IBD or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who began treatment with vedolizumab, tofacitinib, or infliximab from January 2015 through December 2015. Adherence evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and cumulative days with gaps at least 20% beyond expected interval (CG20) using multivariable generalized linear equation models. Persistence assessed as time to treatment discontinuation over 12 months of follow-up using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models; proportion of persistent patients determined via multivariable logistic regression. Indirect comparisons across disease states adjusted using infliximab data. RESULTS: After indirect adjustment by disease, mean PDC difference was significantly higher (difference of 4.7%; P = 0.0376) and mean CG20 was lower (difference of 15 days; P = 0.0646) but not statistically significant in vedolizumab/IBD than tofacitinib/RA. CONCLUSION: We describe a novel adjustment method for interdisease treatment differences using infliximab treatment patterns to bridge differences between IBD and RA. After adjustment, adherence was higher with infusions than oral medications, which may affect outcomes. Indirect comparisons between vedolizumab and tofacitinib are not generalizable and should be confirmed in tofacitinib-treated IBD patients. FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01037-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6822974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68229742019-11-06 Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Moran, Kellyn Null, Kyle Huang, Zhongwen Lissoos, Trevor Kane, Sunanda Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patients’ adherence to and persistence on treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can vary, depending on type and distribution of disease and treatment modality. We aim to identify differences in adherence and persistence with treatments with different administration routes (intravenous vs oral) in IBD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of a claims database of adult patients diagnosed with IBD or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who began treatment with vedolizumab, tofacitinib, or infliximab from January 2015 through December 2015. Adherence evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and cumulative days with gaps at least 20% beyond expected interval (CG20) using multivariable generalized linear equation models. Persistence assessed as time to treatment discontinuation over 12 months of follow-up using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models; proportion of persistent patients determined via multivariable logistic regression. Indirect comparisons across disease states adjusted using infliximab data. RESULTS: After indirect adjustment by disease, mean PDC difference was significantly higher (difference of 4.7%; P = 0.0376) and mean CG20 was lower (difference of 15 days; P = 0.0646) but not statistically significant in vedolizumab/IBD than tofacitinib/RA. CONCLUSION: We describe a novel adjustment method for interdisease treatment differences using infliximab treatment patterns to bridge differences between IBD and RA. After adjustment, adherence was higher with infusions than oral medications, which may affect outcomes. Indirect comparisons between vedolizumab and tofacitinib are not generalizable and should be confirmed in tofacitinib-treated IBD patients. FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01037-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-08-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6822974/ /pubmed/31385283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01037-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moran, Kellyn
Null, Kyle
Huang, Zhongwen
Lissoos, Trevor
Kane, Sunanda
Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
title Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
title_full Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
title_fullStr Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
title_short Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
title_sort retrospective claims analysis indirectly comparing medication adherence and persistence between intravenous biologics and oral small-molecule therapies in inflammatory bowel diseases
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01037-x
work_keys_str_mv AT morankellyn retrospectiveclaimsanalysisindirectlycomparingmedicationadherenceandpersistencebetweenintravenousbiologicsandoralsmallmoleculetherapiesininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT nullkyle retrospectiveclaimsanalysisindirectlycomparingmedicationadherenceandpersistencebetweenintravenousbiologicsandoralsmallmoleculetherapiesininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT huangzhongwen retrospectiveclaimsanalysisindirectlycomparingmedicationadherenceandpersistencebetweenintravenousbiologicsandoralsmallmoleculetherapiesininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT lissoostrevor retrospectiveclaimsanalysisindirectlycomparingmedicationadherenceandpersistencebetweenintravenousbiologicsandoralsmallmoleculetherapiesininflammatoryboweldiseases
AT kanesunanda retrospectiveclaimsanalysisindirectlycomparingmedicationadherenceandpersistencebetweenintravenousbiologicsandoralsmallmoleculetherapiesininflammatoryboweldiseases