Cargando…

The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) has increased due to improved overall survival (OS) in uterine cervical cancer. However, research about prognostic factors and therapeutic guidelines for BM in uterine cervical cancer remains scarce due to the rarity of BM in this type of canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyera, Lee, Kang Kook, Heo, Mi Hwa, Kim, Jin Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30360020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.051
_version_ 1783464559111045120
author Kim, Hyera
Lee, Kang Kook
Heo, Mi Hwa
Kim, Jin Young
author_facet Kim, Hyera
Lee, Kang Kook
Heo, Mi Hwa
Kim, Jin Young
author_sort Kim, Hyera
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) has increased due to improved overall survival (OS) in uterine cervical cancer. However, research about prognostic factors and therapeutic guidelines for BM in uterine cervical cancer remains scarce due to the rarity of BM in this type of cancer. The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing OS in patients with BM from uterine cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 19 BM patients of uterine cervical cancer were analyzed retrospectively from January 1995 to December 2016. RESULTS: The median and mean OS of all patients was 9.6 and 15.4 months. Treatment (vs. palliative care, p < 0.001), fewer than three regimens of chemotherapy before BM (vs. ≥ 3, p < 0.013), and chemotherapy after BM (vs. absence, p < 0.001) significantly increased the OS time. The Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 (vs. < 70, p = 0.213), single BM (vs. multiple BM, p = 0.157), and small cell carcinoma (vs. others, p = 0.351) had numerically higher OS than others. Dual therapy (vs. single therapy, p = 0.182; vs. no therapy, p = 0.076) were associated with a longer OS time, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) appeared to be a better prognostic tool than the recursive partitioning analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest active multimodal treatment including neurosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for BM of uterine cervical cancer with single BM, good performance status, histology of small cell carcinoma, and a better GPA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6823565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68235652019-11-12 The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis Kim, Hyera Lee, Kang Kook Heo, Mi Hwa Kim, Jin Young Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) has increased due to improved overall survival (OS) in uterine cervical cancer. However, research about prognostic factors and therapeutic guidelines for BM in uterine cervical cancer remains scarce due to the rarity of BM in this type of cancer. The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing OS in patients with BM from uterine cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 19 BM patients of uterine cervical cancer were analyzed retrospectively from January 1995 to December 2016. RESULTS: The median and mean OS of all patients was 9.6 and 15.4 months. Treatment (vs. palliative care, p < 0.001), fewer than three regimens of chemotherapy before BM (vs. ≥ 3, p < 0.013), and chemotherapy after BM (vs. absence, p < 0.001) significantly increased the OS time. The Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 (vs. < 70, p = 0.213), single BM (vs. multiple BM, p = 0.157), and small cell carcinoma (vs. others, p = 0.351) had numerically higher OS than others. Dual therapy (vs. single therapy, p = 0.182; vs. no therapy, p = 0.076) were associated with a longer OS time, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) appeared to be a better prognostic tool than the recursive partitioning analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest active multimodal treatment including neurosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for BM of uterine cervical cancer with single BM, good performance status, histology of small cell carcinoma, and a better GPA. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2019-11 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6823565/ /pubmed/30360020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.051 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hyera
Lee, Kang Kook
Heo, Mi Hwa
Kim, Jin Young
The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
title The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
title_full The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
title_fullStr The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
title_short The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
title_sort prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30360020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.051
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyera theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis
AT leekangkook theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis
AT heomihwa theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis
AT kimjinyoung theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis
AT kimhyera prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis
AT leekangkook prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis
AT heomihwa prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis
AT kimjinyoung prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis