Cargando…
The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) has increased due to improved overall survival (OS) in uterine cervical cancer. However, research about prognostic factors and therapeutic guidelines for BM in uterine cervical cancer remains scarce due to the rarity of BM in this type of canc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30360020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.051 |
_version_ | 1783464559111045120 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyera Lee, Kang Kook Heo, Mi Hwa Kim, Jin Young |
author_facet | Kim, Hyera Lee, Kang Kook Heo, Mi Hwa Kim, Jin Young |
author_sort | Kim, Hyera |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) has increased due to improved overall survival (OS) in uterine cervical cancer. However, research about prognostic factors and therapeutic guidelines for BM in uterine cervical cancer remains scarce due to the rarity of BM in this type of cancer. The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing OS in patients with BM from uterine cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 19 BM patients of uterine cervical cancer were analyzed retrospectively from January 1995 to December 2016. RESULTS: The median and mean OS of all patients was 9.6 and 15.4 months. Treatment (vs. palliative care, p < 0.001), fewer than three regimens of chemotherapy before BM (vs. ≥ 3, p < 0.013), and chemotherapy after BM (vs. absence, p < 0.001) significantly increased the OS time. The Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 (vs. < 70, p = 0.213), single BM (vs. multiple BM, p = 0.157), and small cell carcinoma (vs. others, p = 0.351) had numerically higher OS than others. Dual therapy (vs. single therapy, p = 0.182; vs. no therapy, p = 0.076) were associated with a longer OS time, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) appeared to be a better prognostic tool than the recursive partitioning analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest active multimodal treatment including neurosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for BM of uterine cervical cancer with single BM, good performance status, histology of small cell carcinoma, and a better GPA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6823565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68235652019-11-12 The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis Kim, Hyera Lee, Kang Kook Heo, Mi Hwa Kim, Jin Young Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of brain metastasis (BM) has increased due to improved overall survival (OS) in uterine cervical cancer. However, research about prognostic factors and therapeutic guidelines for BM in uterine cervical cancer remains scarce due to the rarity of BM in this type of cancer. The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing OS in patients with BM from uterine cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 19 BM patients of uterine cervical cancer were analyzed retrospectively from January 1995 to December 2016. RESULTS: The median and mean OS of all patients was 9.6 and 15.4 months. Treatment (vs. palliative care, p < 0.001), fewer than three regimens of chemotherapy before BM (vs. ≥ 3, p < 0.013), and chemotherapy after BM (vs. absence, p < 0.001) significantly increased the OS time. The Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 (vs. < 70, p = 0.213), single BM (vs. multiple BM, p = 0.157), and small cell carcinoma (vs. others, p = 0.351) had numerically higher OS than others. Dual therapy (vs. single therapy, p = 0.182; vs. no therapy, p = 0.076) were associated with a longer OS time, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) appeared to be a better prognostic tool than the recursive partitioning analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest active multimodal treatment including neurosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for BM of uterine cervical cancer with single BM, good performance status, histology of small cell carcinoma, and a better GPA. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2019-11 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6823565/ /pubmed/30360020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.051 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Hyera Lee, Kang Kook Heo, Mi Hwa Kim, Jin Young The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis |
title | The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis |
title_full | The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis |
title_fullStr | The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis |
title_short | The prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis |
title_sort | prognostic factors influencing overall survival in uterine cervical cancer with brain metastasis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30360020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyera theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis AT leekangkook theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis AT heomihwa theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis AT kimjinyoung theprognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis AT kimhyera prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis AT leekangkook prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis AT heomihwa prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis AT kimjinyoung prognosticfactorsinfluencingoverallsurvivalinuterinecervicalcancerwithbrainmetastasis |