Cargando…

Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes and complications of dislocated intraocular lens (IOL) extraction and secondary iris-claw IOL (ICIOL) implantation in vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 19 vitrectomized eyes and 11 non-vitrectomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ersöz, M. Giray, Hocaoğlu, Mümin, Sayman Muslubaş, Işıl Bahar, Arf, Serra, Karaçorlu, Murat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31650810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.79735
_version_ 1783464563437469696
author Ersöz, M. Giray
Hocaoğlu, Mümin
Sayman Muslubaş, Işıl Bahar
Arf, Serra
Karaçorlu, Murat
author_facet Ersöz, M. Giray
Hocaoğlu, Mümin
Sayman Muslubaş, Işıl Bahar
Arf, Serra
Karaçorlu, Murat
author_sort Ersöz, M. Giray
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes and complications of dislocated intraocular lens (IOL) extraction and secondary iris-claw IOL (ICIOL) implantation in vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 19 vitrectomized eyes and 11 non-vitrectomized eyes that underwent dislocated IOL extraction and secondary anterior chamber ICIOL implantation between June 2014 and September 2017 and had at least one year of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, operative time, baseline anatomic and functional measurements, or postoperative changes in these measurements (all p>0.05). Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was significantly higher than preoperative values in both groups (both p<0.05). Complication rates did not differ between the groups (all p>0.05). In both groups, endothelial cell density was significantly lower at postoperative 1 year compared to preoperative measurements. There was no significant difference between groups regarding endothelial cell loss (p=0.49). One vitrectomized eye had corneal decompensation. Other complications included hyphema, transient increase of intraocular pressure, secondary glaucoma, pupillary irregularity, and dislocation of ICIOL. Mean operative time was 26.4±5.9 minutes. CONCLUSION: Dislocated IOL extraction and secondary anterior chamber ICIOL implantation is a safe treatment option in both vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6823582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68235822019-11-07 Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes Ersöz, M. Giray Hocaoğlu, Mümin Sayman Muslubaş, Işıl Bahar Arf, Serra Karaçorlu, Murat Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes and complications of dislocated intraocular lens (IOL) extraction and secondary iris-claw IOL (ICIOL) implantation in vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 19 vitrectomized eyes and 11 non-vitrectomized eyes that underwent dislocated IOL extraction and secondary anterior chamber ICIOL implantation between June 2014 and September 2017 and had at least one year of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, operative time, baseline anatomic and functional measurements, or postoperative changes in these measurements (all p>0.05). Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was significantly higher than preoperative values in both groups (both p<0.05). Complication rates did not differ between the groups (all p>0.05). In both groups, endothelial cell density was significantly lower at postoperative 1 year compared to preoperative measurements. There was no significant difference between groups regarding endothelial cell loss (p=0.49). One vitrectomized eye had corneal decompensation. Other complications included hyphema, transient increase of intraocular pressure, secondary glaucoma, pupillary irregularity, and dislocation of ICIOL. Mean operative time was 26.4±5.9 minutes. CONCLUSION: Dislocated IOL extraction and secondary anterior chamber ICIOL implantation is a safe treatment option in both vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes. Galenos Publishing 2019-10 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6823582/ /pubmed/31650810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.79735 Text en © Copyright 2019 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ersöz, M. Giray
Hocaoğlu, Mümin
Sayman Muslubaş, Işıl Bahar
Arf, Serra
Karaçorlu, Murat
Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes
title Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes
title_full Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes
title_fullStr Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes
title_full_unstemmed Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes
title_short Dislocated Intraocular Lens Extraction and Iris-Claw Lens Implantation in Vitrectomized and Non-vitrectomized Eyes
title_sort dislocated intraocular lens extraction and iris-claw lens implantation in vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31650810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.79735
work_keys_str_mv AT ersozmgiray dislocatedintraocularlensextractionandirisclawlensimplantationinvitrectomizedandnonvitrectomizedeyes
AT hocaoglumumin dislocatedintraocularlensextractionandirisclawlensimplantationinvitrectomizedandnonvitrectomizedeyes
AT saymanmuslubasisılbahar dislocatedintraocularlensextractionandirisclawlensimplantationinvitrectomizedandnonvitrectomizedeyes
AT arfserra dislocatedintraocularlensextractionandirisclawlensimplantationinvitrectomizedandnonvitrectomizedeyes
AT karacorlumurat dislocatedintraocularlensextractionandirisclawlensimplantationinvitrectomizedandnonvitrectomizedeyes