Cargando…
Recent advances in the induction of labor
The rate of labor induction is steadily increasing and, in industrialized countries, approximately one out of four pregnant women has their labor induced. Induction of labor should be considered when the benefits of prompt vaginal delivery outweigh the maternal and/or fetal risks of waiting for the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723412 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17587.1 |
_version_ | 1783464616617050112 |
---|---|
author | Marconi, Anna Maria |
author_facet | Marconi, Anna Maria |
author_sort | Marconi, Anna Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rate of labor induction is steadily increasing and, in industrialized countries, approximately one out of four pregnant women has their labor induced. Induction of labor should be considered when the benefits of prompt vaginal delivery outweigh the maternal and/or fetal risks of waiting for the spontaneous onset of labor. However, this procedure is not free of risks, which include an increase in operative vaginal or caesarean delivery and excessive uterine activity with risk of fetal heart rate abnormalities. A search for “Induction of Labor” retrieves more than 18,000 citations from 1844 to the present day. The aim of this review is to summarize the controversies concerning the indications, the methods, and the tools for evaluating the success of the procedure, with an emphasis on the scientific evidence behind each. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6823899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68238992019-11-12 Recent advances in the induction of labor Marconi, Anna Maria F1000Res Review The rate of labor induction is steadily increasing and, in industrialized countries, approximately one out of four pregnant women has their labor induced. Induction of labor should be considered when the benefits of prompt vaginal delivery outweigh the maternal and/or fetal risks of waiting for the spontaneous onset of labor. However, this procedure is not free of risks, which include an increase in operative vaginal or caesarean delivery and excessive uterine activity with risk of fetal heart rate abnormalities. A search for “Induction of Labor” retrieves more than 18,000 citations from 1844 to the present day. The aim of this review is to summarize the controversies concerning the indications, the methods, and the tools for evaluating the success of the procedure, with an emphasis on the scientific evidence behind each. F1000 Research Limited 2019-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6823899/ /pubmed/31723412 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17587.1 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Marconi AM http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Marconi, Anna Maria Recent advances in the induction of labor |
title | Recent advances in the induction of labor |
title_full | Recent advances in the induction of labor |
title_fullStr | Recent advances in the induction of labor |
title_full_unstemmed | Recent advances in the induction of labor |
title_short | Recent advances in the induction of labor |
title_sort | recent advances in the induction of labor |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723412 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17587.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marconiannamaria recentadvancesintheinductionoflabor |