Cargando…
Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention. METHODS: Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0 |
_version_ | 1783464625817255936 |
---|---|
author | Biggs, Katie Hind, Daniel Bradburn, Mike Swaby, Lizzie Brown, Steve |
author_facet | Biggs, Katie Hind, Daniel Bradburn, Mike Swaby, Lizzie Brown, Steve |
author_sort | Biggs, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention. METHODS: Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical randomised controlled trial are discussed. In this surgical trial, forecasting of consent rates based on similar trials and micro-costing of study activities with research partners were undertaken and a video was produced targeting recruiting staff with the aim of aiding recruitment. The baseline assessments were reviewed to ensure the timing did not impact on the outcome. Attrition due to procedure waiting time was monitored and data were triangulated for the primary outcome to ensure adequate follow-up data. RESULTS: Forecasting and costing ensured that the recruitment window was of adequate length and adequate resource was available for study procedures at multiple clinics in each hospital. Recruiting staff found the recruitment video useful. The comparison of patient-reported data collected prior to randomisation and prior to treatment provided confidence in the baseline data. Knowledge of participant dropout due to delays in treatment meant we were able to increase the recruitment target in a timely fashion, and along with the triangulation of data sources, this ensured adequate follow-up of randomised participants. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a range of evidence-based and experience-based approaches which, collectively, resulted in meeting our study objectives and from which lessons may be transferable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN41394716. Registered on 10 May 2012. UKCRN Study ID: 12486. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6823948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68239482019-11-06 Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial Biggs, Katie Hind, Daniel Bradburn, Mike Swaby, Lizzie Brown, Steve Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention. METHODS: Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical randomised controlled trial are discussed. In this surgical trial, forecasting of consent rates based on similar trials and micro-costing of study activities with research partners were undertaken and a video was produced targeting recruiting staff with the aim of aiding recruitment. The baseline assessments were reviewed to ensure the timing did not impact on the outcome. Attrition due to procedure waiting time was monitored and data were triangulated for the primary outcome to ensure adequate follow-up data. RESULTS: Forecasting and costing ensured that the recruitment window was of adequate length and adequate resource was available for study procedures at multiple clinics in each hospital. Recruiting staff found the recruitment video useful. The comparison of patient-reported data collected prior to randomisation and prior to treatment provided confidence in the baseline data. Knowledge of participant dropout due to delays in treatment meant we were able to increase the recruitment target in a timely fashion, and along with the triangulation of data sources, this ensured adequate follow-up of randomised participants. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a range of evidence-based and experience-based approaches which, collectively, resulted in meeting our study objectives and from which lessons may be transferable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN41394716. Registered on 10 May 2012. UKCRN Study ID: 12486. BioMed Central 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6823948/ /pubmed/31675992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Biggs, Katie Hind, Daniel Bradburn, Mike Swaby, Lizzie Brown, Steve Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title | Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biggskatie designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hinddaniel designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bradburnmike designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT swabylizzie designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brownsteve designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |