Cargando…

Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention. METHODS: Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biggs, Katie, Hind, Daniel, Bradburn, Mike, Swaby, Lizzie, Brown, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0
_version_ 1783464625817255936
author Biggs, Katie
Hind, Daniel
Bradburn, Mike
Swaby, Lizzie
Brown, Steve
author_facet Biggs, Katie
Hind, Daniel
Bradburn, Mike
Swaby, Lizzie
Brown, Steve
author_sort Biggs, Katie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention. METHODS: Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical randomised controlled trial are discussed. In this surgical trial, forecasting of consent rates based on similar trials and micro-costing of study activities with research partners were undertaken and a video was produced targeting recruiting staff with the aim of aiding recruitment. The baseline assessments were reviewed to ensure the timing did not impact on the outcome. Attrition due to procedure waiting time was monitored and data were triangulated for the primary outcome to ensure adequate follow-up data. RESULTS: Forecasting and costing ensured that the recruitment window was of adequate length and adequate resource was available for study procedures at multiple clinics in each hospital. Recruiting staff found the recruitment video useful. The comparison of patient-reported data collected prior to randomisation and prior to treatment provided confidence in the baseline data. Knowledge of participant dropout due to delays in treatment meant we were able to increase the recruitment target in a timely fashion, and along with the triangulation of data sources, this ensured adequate follow-up of randomised participants. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a range of evidence-based and experience-based approaches which, collectively, resulted in meeting our study objectives and from which lessons may be transferable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN41394716. Registered on 10 May 2012. UKCRN Study ID: 12486.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6823948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68239482019-11-06 Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial Biggs, Katie Hind, Daniel Bradburn, Mike Swaby, Lizzie Brown, Steve Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Increasingly, pragmatic randomised controlled trials are being used to evaluate surgical interventions, although they present particular difficulties in regards to recruitment and retention. METHODS: Procedures and processes related to implementation of a multi-centre pragmatic surgical randomised controlled trial are discussed. In this surgical trial, forecasting of consent rates based on similar trials and micro-costing of study activities with research partners were undertaken and a video was produced targeting recruiting staff with the aim of aiding recruitment. The baseline assessments were reviewed to ensure the timing did not impact on the outcome. Attrition due to procedure waiting time was monitored and data were triangulated for the primary outcome to ensure adequate follow-up data. RESULTS: Forecasting and costing ensured that the recruitment window was of adequate length and adequate resource was available for study procedures at multiple clinics in each hospital. Recruiting staff found the recruitment video useful. The comparison of patient-reported data collected prior to randomisation and prior to treatment provided confidence in the baseline data. Knowledge of participant dropout due to delays in treatment meant we were able to increase the recruitment target in a timely fashion, and along with the triangulation of data sources, this ensured adequate follow-up of randomised participants. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a range of evidence-based and experience-based approaches which, collectively, resulted in meeting our study objectives and from which lessons may be transferable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN41394716. Registered on 10 May 2012. UKCRN Study ID: 12486. BioMed Central 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6823948/ /pubmed/31675992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Biggs, Katie
Hind, Daniel
Bradburn, Mike
Swaby, Lizzie
Brown, Steve
Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_full Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_short Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
title_sort design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0
work_keys_str_mv AT biggskatie designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hinddaniel designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bradburnmike designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT swabylizzie designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brownsteve designplanningandimplementationlessonslearntfromasurgicalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial