Cargando…

Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support

BACKGROUND: Various forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations. Over the past years, increasing attention has been paid to the question of how to foster the quality of ethics support. In the Netherlands, a CES quality assessment project based on a respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Baarle, Eva M., Potma, Marieke C., van Hoek, Maria E. C., Hartman, Laura A., Molewijk, Bert A. C., van Gurp, Jelle L. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0418-2
_version_ 1783464660439138304
author van Baarle, Eva M.
Potma, Marieke C.
van Hoek, Maria E. C.
Hartman, Laura A.
Molewijk, Bert A. C.
van Gurp, Jelle L. P.
author_facet van Baarle, Eva M.
Potma, Marieke C.
van Hoek, Maria E. C.
Hartman, Laura A.
Molewijk, Bert A. C.
van Gurp, Jelle L. P.
author_sort van Baarle, Eva M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations. Over the past years, increasing attention has been paid to the question of how to foster the quality of ethics support. In the Netherlands, a CES quality assessment project based on a responsive evaluation design has been implemented. CES practitioners themselves reflected upon the quality of ethics support within each other’s health care organizations. This study presents a qualitative evaluation of this Responsive Quality Assessment (RQA) project. METHODS: CES practitioners’ experiences with and perspectives on the RQA project were collected by means of ten semi-structured interviews. Both the data collection and the qualitative data analysis followed a stepwise approach, including continuous peer review and careful documentation of the decisions. RESULTS: The main findings illustrate the relevance of the RQA with regard to fostering the quality of CES by connecting to context specific issues, such as gaining support from upper management and to solidify CES services within health care organizations. Based on their participation in the RQA, CES practitioners perceived a number of changes regarding CES in Dutch health care organizations after the RQA: acknowledgement of the relevance of CES for the quality of care; CES practices being more formalized; inspiration for developing new CES-related activities and more self-reflection on existing CES practices. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the RQA shows that this method facilitates an open learning process by actively involving CES practitioners and their concrete practices. Lessons learned include that “servant leadership” and more intensive guidance of RQA participants may help to further enhance both the critical dimension and the learning process within RQA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6824048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68240482019-11-06 Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support van Baarle, Eva M. Potma, Marieke C. van Hoek, Maria E. C. Hartman, Laura A. Molewijk, Bert A. C. van Gurp, Jelle L. P. BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Various forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations. Over the past years, increasing attention has been paid to the question of how to foster the quality of ethics support. In the Netherlands, a CES quality assessment project based on a responsive evaluation design has been implemented. CES practitioners themselves reflected upon the quality of ethics support within each other’s health care organizations. This study presents a qualitative evaluation of this Responsive Quality Assessment (RQA) project. METHODS: CES practitioners’ experiences with and perspectives on the RQA project were collected by means of ten semi-structured interviews. Both the data collection and the qualitative data analysis followed a stepwise approach, including continuous peer review and careful documentation of the decisions. RESULTS: The main findings illustrate the relevance of the RQA with regard to fostering the quality of CES by connecting to context specific issues, such as gaining support from upper management and to solidify CES services within health care organizations. Based on their participation in the RQA, CES practitioners perceived a number of changes regarding CES in Dutch health care organizations after the RQA: acknowledgement of the relevance of CES for the quality of care; CES practices being more formalized; inspiration for developing new CES-related activities and more self-reflection on existing CES practices. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the RQA shows that this method facilitates an open learning process by actively involving CES practitioners and their concrete practices. Lessons learned include that “servant leadership” and more intensive guidance of RQA participants may help to further enhance both the critical dimension and the learning process within RQA. BioMed Central 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6824048/ /pubmed/31675970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0418-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Baarle, Eva M.
Potma, Marieke C.
van Hoek, Maria E. C.
Hartman, Laura A.
Molewijk, Bert A. C.
van Gurp, Jelle L. P.
Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
title Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
title_full Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
title_fullStr Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
title_full_unstemmed Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
title_short Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
title_sort lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0418-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbaarleevam lessonslearnedfromimplementingaresponsivequalityassessmentofclinicalethicssupport
AT potmamariekec lessonslearnedfromimplementingaresponsivequalityassessmentofclinicalethicssupport
AT vanhoekmariaec lessonslearnedfromimplementingaresponsivequalityassessmentofclinicalethicssupport
AT hartmanlauraa lessonslearnedfromimplementingaresponsivequalityassessmentofclinicalethicssupport
AT molewijkbertac lessonslearnedfromimplementingaresponsivequalityassessmentofclinicalethicssupport
AT vangurpjellelp lessonslearnedfromimplementingaresponsivequalityassessmentofclinicalethicssupport