Cargando…
Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
BACKGROUND: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6261-5 |
_version_ | 1783464675742056448 |
---|---|
author | Trotsyuk, Iryna Sparschuh, Halina Müller, Alice Josephine Neumann, Konrad Kruschewski, Martin Horst, David Elezkurtaj, Sefer |
author_facet | Trotsyuk, Iryna Sparschuh, Halina Müller, Alice Josephine Neumann, Konrad Kruschewski, Martin Horst, David Elezkurtaj, Sefer |
author_sort | Trotsyuk, Iryna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consecutive surgery were included. Surgical specimens were evaluated for budding and routine clinicopathological features. Budding was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and by cytokeratin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. RESULTS: A budding rate of 36.9% (n = 38) by H&E and 55.6% (n = 55) by IHC was observed. Budding was significantly associated with a high ypT and ypN status, poor differentiation, and low degrees of tumor regression. Moreover, budding was strongly predictive of a worse patient outcome, as measured by tumor recurrence or death. In multivariate analyses, budding remained the only significant parameter for overall survival and was even superior to the ypT and ypN status (budding in H&E: hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15–6.44, p = 0.023; budding in IHC: HR 5.19, 95% CI 1.62–16.61, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Budding is a strong prognostic predictor of survival in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. A standardized evaluation of tumor budding after neoadjuvant therapy may thus aid in risk stratification and guide the clinical management of patients with rectal cancer. Immunostaining can help to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6824112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68241122019-11-06 Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Trotsyuk, Iryna Sparschuh, Halina Müller, Alice Josephine Neumann, Konrad Kruschewski, Martin Horst, David Elezkurtaj, Sefer BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consecutive surgery were included. Surgical specimens were evaluated for budding and routine clinicopathological features. Budding was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and by cytokeratin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. RESULTS: A budding rate of 36.9% (n = 38) by H&E and 55.6% (n = 55) by IHC was observed. Budding was significantly associated with a high ypT and ypN status, poor differentiation, and low degrees of tumor regression. Moreover, budding was strongly predictive of a worse patient outcome, as measured by tumor recurrence or death. In multivariate analyses, budding remained the only significant parameter for overall survival and was even superior to the ypT and ypN status (budding in H&E: hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15–6.44, p = 0.023; budding in IHC: HR 5.19, 95% CI 1.62–16.61, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Budding is a strong prognostic predictor of survival in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. A standardized evaluation of tumor budding after neoadjuvant therapy may thus aid in risk stratification and guide the clinical management of patients with rectal cancer. Immunostaining can help to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance. BioMed Central 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6824112/ /pubmed/31675950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6261-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Trotsyuk, Iryna Sparschuh, Halina Müller, Alice Josephine Neumann, Konrad Kruschewski, Martin Horst, David Elezkurtaj, Sefer Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
title | Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
title_full | Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
title_short | Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
title_sort | tumor budding outperforms ypt and ypn classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6261-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trotsyukiryna tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy AT sparschuhhalina tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy AT mulleralicejosephine tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy AT neumannkonrad tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy AT kruschewskimartin tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy AT horstdavid tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy AT elezkurtajsefer tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy |