Cargando…

Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trotsyuk, Iryna, Sparschuh, Halina, Müller, Alice Josephine, Neumann, Konrad, Kruschewski, Martin, Horst, David, Elezkurtaj, Sefer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6261-5
_version_ 1783464675742056448
author Trotsyuk, Iryna
Sparschuh, Halina
Müller, Alice Josephine
Neumann, Konrad
Kruschewski, Martin
Horst, David
Elezkurtaj, Sefer
author_facet Trotsyuk, Iryna
Sparschuh, Halina
Müller, Alice Josephine
Neumann, Konrad
Kruschewski, Martin
Horst, David
Elezkurtaj, Sefer
author_sort Trotsyuk, Iryna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consecutive surgery were included. Surgical specimens were evaluated for budding and routine clinicopathological features. Budding was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and by cytokeratin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. RESULTS: A budding rate of 36.9% (n = 38) by H&E and 55.6% (n = 55) by IHC was observed. Budding was significantly associated with a high ypT and ypN status, poor differentiation, and low degrees of tumor regression. Moreover, budding was strongly predictive of a worse patient outcome, as measured by tumor recurrence or death. In multivariate analyses, budding remained the only significant parameter for overall survival and was even superior to the ypT and ypN status (budding in H&E: hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15–6.44, p = 0.023; budding in IHC: HR 5.19, 95% CI 1.62–16.61, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Budding is a strong prognostic predictor of survival in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. A standardized evaluation of tumor budding after neoadjuvant therapy may thus aid in risk stratification and guide the clinical management of patients with rectal cancer. Immunostaining can help to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6824112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68241122019-11-06 Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Trotsyuk, Iryna Sparschuh, Halina Müller, Alice Josephine Neumann, Konrad Kruschewski, Martin Horst, David Elezkurtaj, Sefer BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Budding is a complementary prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to clarify the role of tumor budding in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consecutive surgery were included. Surgical specimens were evaluated for budding and routine clinicopathological features. Budding was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and by cytokeratin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. RESULTS: A budding rate of 36.9% (n = 38) by H&E and 55.6% (n = 55) by IHC was observed. Budding was significantly associated with a high ypT and ypN status, poor differentiation, and low degrees of tumor regression. Moreover, budding was strongly predictive of a worse patient outcome, as measured by tumor recurrence or death. In multivariate analyses, budding remained the only significant parameter for overall survival and was even superior to the ypT and ypN status (budding in H&E: hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15–6.44, p = 0.023; budding in IHC: HR 5.19, 95% CI 1.62–16.61, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Budding is a strong prognostic predictor of survival in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. A standardized evaluation of tumor budding after neoadjuvant therapy may thus aid in risk stratification and guide the clinical management of patients with rectal cancer. Immunostaining can help to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance. BioMed Central 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6824112/ /pubmed/31675950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6261-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Trotsyuk, Iryna
Sparschuh, Halina
Müller, Alice Josephine
Neumann, Konrad
Kruschewski, Martin
Horst, David
Elezkurtaj, Sefer
Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_short Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_sort tumor budding outperforms ypt and ypn classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6261-5
work_keys_str_mv AT trotsyukiryna tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT sparschuhhalina tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT mulleralicejosephine tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT neumannkonrad tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT kruschewskimartin tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT horstdavid tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT elezkurtajsefer tumorbuddingoutperformsyptandypnclassificationinpredictingoutcomeofrectalcancerafterneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy