Cargando…

Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries

INTRODUCTION: Various treatment options are available for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. This study aimed to quantify how men with prostate cancer in the United Kingdom (UK), Germany, and Spain perceive the risks and benefits of hypothetical abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Freitas, Hayley M., Ito, Tetsuro, Hadi, Monica, Al-Jassar, Gemma, Henry-Szatkowski, Mickaël, Nafees, Beenish, Lloyd, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3
_version_ 1783464720009789440
author de Freitas, Hayley M.
Ito, Tetsuro
Hadi, Monica
Al-Jassar, Gemma
Henry-Szatkowski, Mickaël
Nafees, Beenish
Lloyd, Andrew J.
author_facet de Freitas, Hayley M.
Ito, Tetsuro
Hadi, Monica
Al-Jassar, Gemma
Henry-Szatkowski, Mickaël
Nafees, Beenish
Lloyd, Andrew J.
author_sort de Freitas, Hayley M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Various treatment options are available for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. This study aimed to quantify how men with prostate cancer in the United Kingdom (UK), Germany, and Spain perceive the risks and benefits of hypothetical abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment and docetaxel-based chemotherapy treatment options. METHODS: A targeted literature review, exploratory interviews with prostate cancer patients and oncologists, and pre-test interviews were used to develop a discrete choice experiments (DCE). The final DCE included 32 choice sets, selected using a main-effects orthogonal design, divided into two survey blocks. Paired profiles presented hypothetical treatments for prostate cancer through six attributes that could be presented at two or four levels each. Preference estimates were estimated using a conditional logit regression model. Preference results were stratified by cancer stage. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants (mean age 69 years) completed the DCE in the UK, Germany, and Spain. Treatment effectiveness was the main concern for the patients (difference in preference estimates between 8 and 32 months 1.443). Participants wanted to avoid pain that was not well controlled (preference dummy coding estimate − 1.157). Participants valued a change from an oral medication to an intravenous treatment (change in preference estimate − 0.416) more negatively than a change from a 1% to a 5% risk of infection (change in preference estimate − 0.313). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that treatment effectiveness and pain control were the most important attributes for patients with prostate cancer. These two attributes influenced more than 50% of their decision-making in this study. The risk of fatigue and mode of administration were least prioritised by patients. This study highlights the relative importance that Spanish, German, and British patients place on various aspects of treatment options for prostate cancer. Understanding patient preference and taking them into consideration shall help physicians when developing their treatment strategies for their patients. FUNDING: Janssen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6824341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68243412019-11-06 Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries de Freitas, Hayley M. Ito, Tetsuro Hadi, Monica Al-Jassar, Gemma Henry-Szatkowski, Mickaël Nafees, Beenish Lloyd, Andrew J. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Various treatment options are available for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. This study aimed to quantify how men with prostate cancer in the United Kingdom (UK), Germany, and Spain perceive the risks and benefits of hypothetical abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment and docetaxel-based chemotherapy treatment options. METHODS: A targeted literature review, exploratory interviews with prostate cancer patients and oncologists, and pre-test interviews were used to develop a discrete choice experiments (DCE). The final DCE included 32 choice sets, selected using a main-effects orthogonal design, divided into two survey blocks. Paired profiles presented hypothetical treatments for prostate cancer through six attributes that could be presented at two or four levels each. Preference estimates were estimated using a conditional logit regression model. Preference results were stratified by cancer stage. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants (mean age 69 years) completed the DCE in the UK, Germany, and Spain. Treatment effectiveness was the main concern for the patients (difference in preference estimates between 8 and 32 months 1.443). Participants wanted to avoid pain that was not well controlled (preference dummy coding estimate − 1.157). Participants valued a change from an oral medication to an intravenous treatment (change in preference estimate − 0.416) more negatively than a change from a 1% to a 5% risk of infection (change in preference estimate − 0.313). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that treatment effectiveness and pain control were the most important attributes for patients with prostate cancer. These two attributes influenced more than 50% of their decision-making in this study. The risk of fatigue and mode of administration were least prioritised by patients. This study highlights the relative importance that Spanish, German, and British patients place on various aspects of treatment options for prostate cancer. Understanding patient preference and taking them into consideration shall help physicians when developing their treatment strategies for their patients. FUNDING: Janssen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-01-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6824341/ /pubmed/30617763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Freitas, Hayley M.
Ito, Tetsuro
Hadi, Monica
Al-Jassar, Gemma
Henry-Szatkowski, Mickaël
Nafees, Beenish
Lloyd, Andrew J.
Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries
title Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries
title_full Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries
title_fullStr Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries
title_full_unstemmed Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries
title_short Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries
title_sort patient preferences for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treatments: a discrete choice experiment among men in three european countries
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3
work_keys_str_mv AT defreitashayleym patientpreferencesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancertreatmentsadiscretechoiceexperimentamongmeninthreeeuropeancountries
AT itotetsuro patientpreferencesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancertreatmentsadiscretechoiceexperimentamongmeninthreeeuropeancountries
AT hadimonica patientpreferencesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancertreatmentsadiscretechoiceexperimentamongmeninthreeeuropeancountries
AT aljassargemma patientpreferencesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancertreatmentsadiscretechoiceexperimentamongmeninthreeeuropeancountries
AT henryszatkowskimickael patientpreferencesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancertreatmentsadiscretechoiceexperimentamongmeninthreeeuropeancountries
AT nafeesbeenish patientpreferencesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancertreatmentsadiscretechoiceexperimentamongmeninthreeeuropeancountries
AT lloydandrewj patientpreferencesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancertreatmentsadiscretechoiceexperimentamongmeninthreeeuropeancountries