Cargando…
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners
ABSTRACT: Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is routinely used as a marker of average glycemic control, but it fails to provide data on hypoglycemia and glycemic variability, both of which are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), particularly in insulin-tr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-0870-x |
_version_ | 1783464722678415360 |
---|---|
author | Ajjan, Ramzi Slattery, David Wright, Eugene |
author_facet | Ajjan, Ramzi Slattery, David Wright, Eugene |
author_sort | Ajjan, Ramzi |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is routinely used as a marker of average glycemic control, but it fails to provide data on hypoglycemia and glycemic variability, both of which are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), particularly in insulin-treated patients, is a cornerstone in the management of patients with diabetes. SMBG helps with treatment decisions that aim to reduce high glucose levels while avoiding hypoglycemia and limiting glucose variability. However, repeated SMBG can be inconvenient to patients and difficult to maintain in the long term. By contrast, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides a convenient, comprehensive assessment of blood glucose levels, allowing the identification of high and low glucose levels, in addition to evaluating glycemic variability. CGM using newer detection and visualization systems can overcome many of the limitations of an HbA1c-based approach while addressing the inconvenience and fragmented glucose data associated with SMBG. When used together with HbA1c monitoring, CGM provides complementary information on glucose levels, thus facilitating the optimization of diabetes therapy while reducing the fear and risk of hypoglycemia. Here we review the capabilities and benefits of CGM, including cost-effectiveness data, and discuss the potential limitations of this glucose-monitoring strategy for the management of patients with diabetes. FUNDING: Sanofi US, Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6824352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68243522019-11-06 Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners Ajjan, Ramzi Slattery, David Wright, Eugene Adv Ther Review ABSTRACT: Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is routinely used as a marker of average glycemic control, but it fails to provide data on hypoglycemia and glycemic variability, both of which are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), particularly in insulin-treated patients, is a cornerstone in the management of patients with diabetes. SMBG helps with treatment decisions that aim to reduce high glucose levels while avoiding hypoglycemia and limiting glucose variability. However, repeated SMBG can be inconvenient to patients and difficult to maintain in the long term. By contrast, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides a convenient, comprehensive assessment of blood glucose levels, allowing the identification of high and low glucose levels, in addition to evaluating glycemic variability. CGM using newer detection and visualization systems can overcome many of the limitations of an HbA1c-based approach while addressing the inconvenience and fragmented glucose data associated with SMBG. When used together with HbA1c monitoring, CGM provides complementary information on glucose levels, thus facilitating the optimization of diabetes therapy while reducing the fear and risk of hypoglycemia. Here we review the capabilities and benefits of CGM, including cost-effectiveness data, and discuss the potential limitations of this glucose-monitoring strategy for the management of patients with diabetes. FUNDING: Sanofi US, Inc. Springer Healthcare 2019-01-18 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6824352/ /pubmed/30659511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-0870-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Ajjan, Ramzi Slattery, David Wright, Eugene Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners |
title | Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners |
title_full | Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners |
title_fullStr | Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners |
title_short | Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners |
title_sort | continuous glucose monitoring: a brief review for primary care practitioners |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-0870-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ajjanramzi continuousglucosemonitoringabriefreviewforprimarycarepractitioners AT slatterydavid continuousglucosemonitoringabriefreviewforprimarycarepractitioners AT wrighteugene continuousglucosemonitoringabriefreviewforprimarycarepractitioners |