Cargando…

Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy administered every 2 weeks (q2w) versus other monotherapies of biologic, targeted and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, csDMARDs) at recommended d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choy, Ernest, Freemantle, Nick, Proudfoot, Clare, Chen, Chieh-I, Pollissard, Laurence, Kuznik, Andreas, van Hoogstraten, Hubert, Mangan, Erin, Carita, Paulo, Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30864105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x
_version_ 1783464722903859200
author Choy, Ernest
Freemantle, Nick
Proudfoot, Clare
Chen, Chieh-I
Pollissard, Laurence
Kuznik, Andreas
van Hoogstraten, Hubert
Mangan, Erin
Carita, Paulo
Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao
author_facet Choy, Ernest
Freemantle, Nick
Proudfoot, Clare
Chen, Chieh-I
Pollissard, Laurence
Kuznik, Andreas
van Hoogstraten, Hubert
Mangan, Erin
Carita, Paulo
Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao
author_sort Choy, Ernest
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy administered every 2 weeks (q2w) versus other monotherapies of biologic, targeted and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, csDMARDs) at recommended doses for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients who are intolerant of or inadequate responders to csDMARDs (csDMARD-IR). METHODS: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on 24-week efficacy outcomes: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 criteria, and European League Against Rheumatism Disease Activity Score 28-joint count erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28) < 2.6. In addition, serious infections and serious adverse events (SI/SAE) were examined at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Nine trials were selected for the NMA. Sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority versus adalimumab monotherapy on all efficacy outcomes and versus tofacitinib monotherapy on ACR20. Compared with csDMARDs, sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority on ACR 20/50/70 criteria and DAS28 < 2.6 but had similar efficacy on HAQ-DI. Efficacy of sarilumab 200 mg was similar versus certolizumab, etanercept, tofacitinib and tocilizumab 8 mg/kg monotherapy across all efficacy outcomes. SI/SAE appeared similar for sarilumab 200 mg versus all comparators. CONCLUSION: In csDMARD-IR patients, sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy has superior efficacy and similar safety versus csDMARDs, superior efficacy and similar safety versus adalimumab, and similar efficacy and safety versus bDMARDs and tsDMARDs. FUNDING: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6824353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68243532019-11-06 Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Choy, Ernest Freemantle, Nick Proudfoot, Clare Chen, Chieh-I Pollissard, Laurence Kuznik, Andreas van Hoogstraten, Hubert Mangan, Erin Carita, Paulo Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy administered every 2 weeks (q2w) versus other monotherapies of biologic, targeted and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, csDMARDs) at recommended doses for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients who are intolerant of or inadequate responders to csDMARDs (csDMARD-IR). METHODS: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on 24-week efficacy outcomes: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 criteria, and European League Against Rheumatism Disease Activity Score 28-joint count erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28) < 2.6. In addition, serious infections and serious adverse events (SI/SAE) were examined at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Nine trials were selected for the NMA. Sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority versus adalimumab monotherapy on all efficacy outcomes and versus tofacitinib monotherapy on ACR20. Compared with csDMARDs, sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority on ACR 20/50/70 criteria and DAS28 < 2.6 but had similar efficacy on HAQ-DI. Efficacy of sarilumab 200 mg was similar versus certolizumab, etanercept, tofacitinib and tocilizumab 8 mg/kg monotherapy across all efficacy outcomes. SI/SAE appeared similar for sarilumab 200 mg versus all comparators. CONCLUSION: In csDMARD-IR patients, sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy has superior efficacy and similar safety versus csDMARDs, superior efficacy and similar safety versus adalimumab, and similar efficacy and safety versus bDMARDs and tsDMARDs. FUNDING: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-03-12 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6824353/ /pubmed/30864105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Choy, Ernest
Freemantle, Nick
Proudfoot, Clare
Chen, Chieh-I
Pollissard, Laurence
Kuznik, Andreas
van Hoogstraten, Hubert
Mangan, Erin
Carita, Paulo
Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao
Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_full Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_fullStr Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_full_unstemmed Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_short Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_sort indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30864105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x
work_keys_str_mv AT choyernest indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT freemantlenick indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT proudfootclare indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT chenchiehi indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT pollissardlaurence indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT kuznikandreas indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT vanhoogstratenhubert indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT manganerin indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT caritapaulo indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT huynhthiminhthao indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs