Cargando…
Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy administered every 2 weeks (q2w) versus other monotherapies of biologic, targeted and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, csDMARDs) at recommended d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30864105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x |
_version_ | 1783464722903859200 |
---|---|
author | Choy, Ernest Freemantle, Nick Proudfoot, Clare Chen, Chieh-I Pollissard, Laurence Kuznik, Andreas van Hoogstraten, Hubert Mangan, Erin Carita, Paulo Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao |
author_facet | Choy, Ernest Freemantle, Nick Proudfoot, Clare Chen, Chieh-I Pollissard, Laurence Kuznik, Andreas van Hoogstraten, Hubert Mangan, Erin Carita, Paulo Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao |
author_sort | Choy, Ernest |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy administered every 2 weeks (q2w) versus other monotherapies of biologic, targeted and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, csDMARDs) at recommended doses for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients who are intolerant of or inadequate responders to csDMARDs (csDMARD-IR). METHODS: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on 24-week efficacy outcomes: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 criteria, and European League Against Rheumatism Disease Activity Score 28-joint count erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28) < 2.6. In addition, serious infections and serious adverse events (SI/SAE) were examined at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Nine trials were selected for the NMA. Sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority versus adalimumab monotherapy on all efficacy outcomes and versus tofacitinib monotherapy on ACR20. Compared with csDMARDs, sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority on ACR 20/50/70 criteria and DAS28 < 2.6 but had similar efficacy on HAQ-DI. Efficacy of sarilumab 200 mg was similar versus certolizumab, etanercept, tofacitinib and tocilizumab 8 mg/kg monotherapy across all efficacy outcomes. SI/SAE appeared similar for sarilumab 200 mg versus all comparators. CONCLUSION: In csDMARD-IR patients, sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy has superior efficacy and similar safety versus csDMARDs, superior efficacy and similar safety versus adalimumab, and similar efficacy and safety versus bDMARDs and tsDMARDs. FUNDING: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6824353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68243532019-11-06 Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Choy, Ernest Freemantle, Nick Proudfoot, Clare Chen, Chieh-I Pollissard, Laurence Kuznik, Andreas van Hoogstraten, Hubert Mangan, Erin Carita, Paulo Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy administered every 2 weeks (q2w) versus other monotherapies of biologic, targeted and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, csDMARDs) at recommended doses for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients who are intolerant of or inadequate responders to csDMARDs (csDMARD-IR). METHODS: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on 24-week efficacy outcomes: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 criteria, and European League Against Rheumatism Disease Activity Score 28-joint count erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28) < 2.6. In addition, serious infections and serious adverse events (SI/SAE) were examined at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Nine trials were selected for the NMA. Sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority versus adalimumab monotherapy on all efficacy outcomes and versus tofacitinib monotherapy on ACR20. Compared with csDMARDs, sarilumab 200 mg showed superiority on ACR 20/50/70 criteria and DAS28 < 2.6 but had similar efficacy on HAQ-DI. Efficacy of sarilumab 200 mg was similar versus certolizumab, etanercept, tofacitinib and tocilizumab 8 mg/kg monotherapy across all efficacy outcomes. SI/SAE appeared similar for sarilumab 200 mg versus all comparators. CONCLUSION: In csDMARD-IR patients, sarilumab 200 mg monotherapy has superior efficacy and similar safety versus csDMARDs, superior efficacy and similar safety versus adalimumab, and similar efficacy and safety versus bDMARDs and tsDMARDs. FUNDING: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-03-12 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6824353/ /pubmed/30864105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Choy, Ernest Freemantle, Nick Proudfoot, Clare Chen, Chieh-I Pollissard, Laurence Kuznik, Andreas van Hoogstraten, Hubert Mangan, Erin Carita, Paulo Huynh, Thi-Minh-Thao Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs |
title | Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs |
title_full | Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs |
title_fullStr | Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs |
title_short | Indirect Treatment Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs |
title_sort | indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30864105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00912-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choyernest indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT freemantlenick indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT proudfootclare indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT chenchiehi indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT pollissardlaurence indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT kuznikandreas indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT vanhoogstratenhubert indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT manganerin indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT caritapaulo indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs AT huynhthiminhthao indirecttreatmentcomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientswithinadequateresponsetoconventionaldiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs |