Cargando…
Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control
INTRODUCTION: The stable, ultra-long duration of action of insulin degludec (degludec) minimizes fluctuations in glucose-lowering activity over the daily (24-h) dosing period, and comparative studies with other basal insulins suggest that these properties translate into a lower risk of hypoglycemia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30879256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00916-7 |
_version_ | 1783464728753864704 |
---|---|
author | Tentolouris, Nikolaos Knudsen, Søren T. Lapolla, Annunziata Wolden, Michael Lyng Haldrup, Steffen Schultes, Bernd |
author_facet | Tentolouris, Nikolaos Knudsen, Søren T. Lapolla, Annunziata Wolden, Michael Lyng Haldrup, Steffen Schultes, Bernd |
author_sort | Tentolouris, Nikolaos |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The stable, ultra-long duration of action of insulin degludec (degludec) minimizes fluctuations in glucose-lowering activity over the daily (24-h) dosing period, and comparative studies with other basal insulins suggest that these properties translate into a lower risk of hypoglycemia at equivalent levels of glycemic control. Results from the real-world European multicenter, retrospective chart review study of 2550 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1D and T2D) in routine clinical care EU-TREAT (NCT02662114) showed that patients benefited from improved glycemic control and significantly reduced rates of hypoglycemia following a switch to degludec. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, EU-TREAT patients were stratified into good (≤ 7.5% HbA1c), intermediate (> 7.5 to ≤ 8.5% HbA1c), and poor (> 8.5% HbA1c) glycemic control at baseline to investigate the possibility of differential benefits, either improved control or reduced risk of hypoglycemia, whichever the need. Changes in HbA1c, overall hypoglycemia, and total insulin dose from baseline to 6 and 12 months follow-up were assessed for each group. RESULTS: For both T1D and T2D patients, those in good initial control experienced significant reductions in rates of hypoglycemia and total insulin dose following the switch, without compromising control. Those in poor initial control achieved significant improvements in HbA1c with no change in rates of hypoglycemia or total insulin dose. CONCLUSION: This analysis expands the findings of EU-TREAT by showing differential changes in the clinical endpoints depending on particular need. It introduces the possibility that the differential benefits of degludec could address two of the renowned clinical challenges faced when treating diabetes: improving glycemic control for optimal management of T1D and titrating insulin dose in T2D, both without fear of increased hypoglycemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02662114. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00916-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6824376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68243762019-11-06 Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control Tentolouris, Nikolaos Knudsen, Søren T. Lapolla, Annunziata Wolden, Michael Lyng Haldrup, Steffen Schultes, Bernd Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The stable, ultra-long duration of action of insulin degludec (degludec) minimizes fluctuations in glucose-lowering activity over the daily (24-h) dosing period, and comparative studies with other basal insulins suggest that these properties translate into a lower risk of hypoglycemia at equivalent levels of glycemic control. Results from the real-world European multicenter, retrospective chart review study of 2550 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1D and T2D) in routine clinical care EU-TREAT (NCT02662114) showed that patients benefited from improved glycemic control and significantly reduced rates of hypoglycemia following a switch to degludec. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, EU-TREAT patients were stratified into good (≤ 7.5% HbA1c), intermediate (> 7.5 to ≤ 8.5% HbA1c), and poor (> 8.5% HbA1c) glycemic control at baseline to investigate the possibility of differential benefits, either improved control or reduced risk of hypoglycemia, whichever the need. Changes in HbA1c, overall hypoglycemia, and total insulin dose from baseline to 6 and 12 months follow-up were assessed for each group. RESULTS: For both T1D and T2D patients, those in good initial control experienced significant reductions in rates of hypoglycemia and total insulin dose following the switch, without compromising control. Those in poor initial control achieved significant improvements in HbA1c with no change in rates of hypoglycemia or total insulin dose. CONCLUSION: This analysis expands the findings of EU-TREAT by showing differential changes in the clinical endpoints depending on particular need. It introduces the possibility that the differential benefits of degludec could address two of the renowned clinical challenges faced when treating diabetes: improving glycemic control for optimal management of T1D and titrating insulin dose in T2D, both without fear of increased hypoglycemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02662114. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00916-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-03-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6824376/ /pubmed/30879256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00916-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tentolouris, Nikolaos Knudsen, Søren T. Lapolla, Annunziata Wolden, Michael Lyng Haldrup, Steffen Schultes, Bernd Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control |
title | Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control |
title_full | Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control |
title_fullStr | Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control |
title_full_unstemmed | Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control |
title_short | Switching “Real-World” Diabetes Patients to Degludec from Other Basal Insulins Provides Different Clinical Benefits According to Their Baseline Glycemic Control |
title_sort | switching “real-world” diabetes patients to degludec from other basal insulins provides different clinical benefits according to their baseline glycemic control |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30879256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00916-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tentolourisnikolaos switchingrealworlddiabetespatientstodegludecfromotherbasalinsulinsprovidesdifferentclinicalbenefitsaccordingtotheirbaselineglycemiccontrol AT knudsensørent switchingrealworlddiabetespatientstodegludecfromotherbasalinsulinsprovidesdifferentclinicalbenefitsaccordingtotheirbaselineglycemiccontrol AT lapollaannunziata switchingrealworlddiabetespatientstodegludecfromotherbasalinsulinsprovidesdifferentclinicalbenefitsaccordingtotheirbaselineglycemiccontrol AT woldenmichaellyng switchingrealworlddiabetespatientstodegludecfromotherbasalinsulinsprovidesdifferentclinicalbenefitsaccordingtotheirbaselineglycemiccontrol AT haldrupsteffen switchingrealworlddiabetespatientstodegludecfromotherbasalinsulinsprovidesdifferentclinicalbenefitsaccordingtotheirbaselineglycemiccontrol AT schultesbernd switchingrealworlddiabetespatientstodegludecfromotherbasalinsulinsprovidesdifferentclinicalbenefitsaccordingtotheirbaselineglycemiccontrol |