Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are associated with increased morbidity and high mortality. Meropenem–vaborbactam (MV) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination active against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y |
_version_ | 1783464740551393280 |
---|---|
author | Bassetti, Matteo Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto Patel, Niki Tillotson, Glenn Massey, Jill |
author_facet | Bassetti, Matteo Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto Patel, Niki Tillotson, Glenn Massey, Jill |
author_sort | Bassetti, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are associated with increased morbidity and high mortality. Meropenem–vaborbactam (MV) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination active against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the TANGO-II randomized controlled trial was to assess the efficacy of MV versus best available therapy (BAT) in the subgroup of patients without prior antimicrobial failure. METHODS: The primary outcome measure was clinical cure at the test of cure (TOC). Secondary outcome measures included (1) clinical cure at the end of therapy (EOT), (2) microbiological cure at TOC, (3) microbiological cure at EOT, and (4) 28-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: First-line MV was associated with a 42.9% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at TOC (95% confidence intervals [CI] 13.7–72.1) in comparison with first-line BAT. A 49.3% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at EOT (95% CI 20.8–77.7), a 42.6% absolute increase in microbiological cure rate at EOT (95% CI 13.4–71.8), and a 36.2% absolute increase in microbiologic cure rate at TOC (95% CI 5.9–66.6) were also observed, in addition to a 29.0% absolute reduction in mortality (95% CI − 54.3 to − 3.7). Overall, fewer adverse events were observed in the MV group than in the BAT group. CONCLUSION: MV was superior to BAT in the subgroup of patients with serious carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections and no prior antimicrobial failure, with very high rates of clinical success, and was well tolerated. Post approval and real-world studies remain essential to clearly define the most appropriate population for early, empirical MV coverage, in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship principles. FUNDING: The Medicines Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6824459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68244592019-11-06 Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis Bassetti, Matteo Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto Patel, Niki Tillotson, Glenn Massey, Jill Adv Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: Infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are associated with increased morbidity and high mortality. Meropenem–vaborbactam (MV) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination active against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the TANGO-II randomized controlled trial was to assess the efficacy of MV versus best available therapy (BAT) in the subgroup of patients without prior antimicrobial failure. METHODS: The primary outcome measure was clinical cure at the test of cure (TOC). Secondary outcome measures included (1) clinical cure at the end of therapy (EOT), (2) microbiological cure at TOC, (3) microbiological cure at EOT, and (4) 28-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: First-line MV was associated with a 42.9% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at TOC (95% confidence intervals [CI] 13.7–72.1) in comparison with first-line BAT. A 49.3% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at EOT (95% CI 20.8–77.7), a 42.6% absolute increase in microbiological cure rate at EOT (95% CI 13.4–71.8), and a 36.2% absolute increase in microbiologic cure rate at TOC (95% CI 5.9–66.6) were also observed, in addition to a 29.0% absolute reduction in mortality (95% CI − 54.3 to − 3.7). Overall, fewer adverse events were observed in the MV group than in the BAT group. CONCLUSION: MV was superior to BAT in the subgroup of patients with serious carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections and no prior antimicrobial failure, with very high rates of clinical success, and was well tolerated. Post approval and real-world studies remain essential to clearly define the most appropriate population for early, empirical MV coverage, in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship principles. FUNDING: The Medicines Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-05-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6824459/ /pubmed/31098989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Bassetti, Matteo Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto Patel, Niki Tillotson, Glenn Massey, Jill Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of meropenem–vaborbactam versus best available therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infections in patients without prior antimicrobial failure: a post hoc analysis |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bassettimatteo efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis AT giacobbedanieleroberto efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis AT patelniki efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis AT tillotsonglenn efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis AT masseyjill efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis |