Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are associated with increased morbidity and high mortality. Meropenem–vaborbactam (MV) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination active against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bassetti, Matteo, Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto, Patel, Niki, Tillotson, Glenn, Massey, Jill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y
_version_ 1783464740551393280
author Bassetti, Matteo
Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto
Patel, Niki
Tillotson, Glenn
Massey, Jill
author_facet Bassetti, Matteo
Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto
Patel, Niki
Tillotson, Glenn
Massey, Jill
author_sort Bassetti, Matteo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are associated with increased morbidity and high mortality. Meropenem–vaborbactam (MV) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination active against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the TANGO-II randomized controlled trial was to assess the efficacy of MV versus best available therapy (BAT) in the subgroup of patients without prior antimicrobial failure. METHODS: The primary outcome measure was clinical cure at the test of cure (TOC). Secondary outcome measures included (1) clinical cure at the end of therapy (EOT), (2) microbiological cure at TOC, (3) microbiological cure at EOT, and (4) 28-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: First-line MV was associated with a 42.9% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at TOC (95% confidence intervals [CI] 13.7–72.1) in comparison with first-line BAT. A 49.3% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at EOT (95% CI 20.8–77.7), a 42.6% absolute increase in microbiological cure rate at EOT (95% CI 13.4–71.8), and a 36.2% absolute increase in microbiologic cure rate at TOC (95% CI 5.9–66.6) were also observed, in addition to a 29.0% absolute reduction in mortality (95% CI − 54.3 to − 3.7). Overall, fewer adverse events were observed in the MV group than in the BAT group. CONCLUSION: MV was superior to BAT in the subgroup of patients with serious carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections and no prior antimicrobial failure, with very high rates of clinical success, and was well tolerated. Post approval and real-world studies remain essential to clearly define the most appropriate population for early, empirical MV coverage, in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship principles. FUNDING: The Medicines Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6824459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68244592019-11-06 Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis Bassetti, Matteo Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto Patel, Niki Tillotson, Glenn Massey, Jill Adv Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: Infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are associated with increased morbidity and high mortality. Meropenem–vaborbactam (MV) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination active against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the TANGO-II randomized controlled trial was to assess the efficacy of MV versus best available therapy (BAT) in the subgroup of patients without prior antimicrobial failure. METHODS: The primary outcome measure was clinical cure at the test of cure (TOC). Secondary outcome measures included (1) clinical cure at the end of therapy (EOT), (2) microbiological cure at TOC, (3) microbiological cure at EOT, and (4) 28-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: First-line MV was associated with a 42.9% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at TOC (95% confidence intervals [CI] 13.7–72.1) in comparison with first-line BAT. A 49.3% absolute increase in clinical cure rate at EOT (95% CI 20.8–77.7), a 42.6% absolute increase in microbiological cure rate at EOT (95% CI 13.4–71.8), and a 36.2% absolute increase in microbiologic cure rate at TOC (95% CI 5.9–66.6) were also observed, in addition to a 29.0% absolute reduction in mortality (95% CI − 54.3 to − 3.7). Overall, fewer adverse events were observed in the MV group than in the BAT group. CONCLUSION: MV was superior to BAT in the subgroup of patients with serious carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections and no prior antimicrobial failure, with very high rates of clinical success, and was well tolerated. Post approval and real-world studies remain essential to clearly define the most appropriate population for early, empirical MV coverage, in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship principles. FUNDING: The Medicines Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-05-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6824459/ /pubmed/31098989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Bassetti, Matteo
Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto
Patel, Niki
Tillotson, Glenn
Massey, Jill
Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of meropenem–vaborbactam versus best available therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infections in patients without prior antimicrobial failure: a post hoc analysis
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00981-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bassettimatteo efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis
AT giacobbedanieleroberto efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis
AT patelniki efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis
AT tillotsonglenn efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis
AT masseyjill efficacyandsafetyofmeropenemvaborbactamversusbestavailabletherapyforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinfectionsinpatientswithoutpriorantimicrobialfailureaposthocanalysis