Cargando…
Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained heart arrhythmia. However, as many cases are asymptomatic, a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed until serious complications arise. Efficient, cost-effective detection of the undiagnosed may be supported by risk-prediction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224582 |
_version_ | 1783464754363236352 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Nathan R. Ayoubkhani, Daniel McEwan, Phil Sugrue, Daniel M. Farooqui, Usman Lister, Steven Lumley, Matthew Bakhai, Ameet Cohen, Alexander T. O’Neill, Mark Clifton, David Gordon, Jason |
author_facet | Hill, Nathan R. Ayoubkhani, Daniel McEwan, Phil Sugrue, Daniel M. Farooqui, Usman Lister, Steven Lumley, Matthew Bakhai, Ameet Cohen, Alexander T. O’Neill, Mark Clifton, David Gordon, Jason |
author_sort | Hill, Nathan R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained heart arrhythmia. However, as many cases are asymptomatic, a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed until serious complications arise. Efficient, cost-effective detection of the undiagnosed may be supported by risk-prediction models relating patient factors to AF risk. However, there exists a need for an implementable risk model that is contemporaneous and informed by routinely collected patient data, reflecting the real-world pathology of AF. METHODS: This study sought to develop and evaluate novel and conventional statistical and machine learning models for risk-predication of AF. This was a retrospective, cohort study of adults (aged ≥30 years) without a history of AF, listed on the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, from January 2006 to December 2016. Models evaluated included published risk models (Framingham, ARIC, CHARGE-AF), machine learning models, which evaluated baseline and time-updated information (neural network, LASSO, random forests, support vector machines), and Cox regression. RESULTS: Analysis of 2,994,837 individuals (3.2% AF) identified time-varying neural networks as the optimal model achieving an AUROC of 0.827 vs. 0.725, with number needed to screen of 9 vs. 13 patients at 75% sensitivity, when compared with the best existing model CHARGE-AF. The optimal model confirmed known baseline risk factors (age, previous cardiovascular disease, antihypertensive medication usage) and identified additional time-varying predictors (proximity of cardiovascular events, body mass index (both levels and changes), pulse pressure, and the frequency of blood pressure measurements). CONCLUSION: The optimal time-varying machine learning model exhibited greater predictive performance than existing AF risk models and reflected known and new patient risk factors for AF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6824570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68245702019-11-12 Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning Hill, Nathan R. Ayoubkhani, Daniel McEwan, Phil Sugrue, Daniel M. Farooqui, Usman Lister, Steven Lumley, Matthew Bakhai, Ameet Cohen, Alexander T. O’Neill, Mark Clifton, David Gordon, Jason PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained heart arrhythmia. However, as many cases are asymptomatic, a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed until serious complications arise. Efficient, cost-effective detection of the undiagnosed may be supported by risk-prediction models relating patient factors to AF risk. However, there exists a need for an implementable risk model that is contemporaneous and informed by routinely collected patient data, reflecting the real-world pathology of AF. METHODS: This study sought to develop and evaluate novel and conventional statistical and machine learning models for risk-predication of AF. This was a retrospective, cohort study of adults (aged ≥30 years) without a history of AF, listed on the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, from January 2006 to December 2016. Models evaluated included published risk models (Framingham, ARIC, CHARGE-AF), machine learning models, which evaluated baseline and time-updated information (neural network, LASSO, random forests, support vector machines), and Cox regression. RESULTS: Analysis of 2,994,837 individuals (3.2% AF) identified time-varying neural networks as the optimal model achieving an AUROC of 0.827 vs. 0.725, with number needed to screen of 9 vs. 13 patients at 75% sensitivity, when compared with the best existing model CHARGE-AF. The optimal model confirmed known baseline risk factors (age, previous cardiovascular disease, antihypertensive medication usage) and identified additional time-varying predictors (proximity of cardiovascular events, body mass index (both levels and changes), pulse pressure, and the frequency of blood pressure measurements). CONCLUSION: The optimal time-varying machine learning model exhibited greater predictive performance than existing AF risk models and reflected known and new patient risk factors for AF. Public Library of Science 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6824570/ /pubmed/31675367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224582 Text en © 2019 Hill et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hill, Nathan R. Ayoubkhani, Daniel McEwan, Phil Sugrue, Daniel M. Farooqui, Usman Lister, Steven Lumley, Matthew Bakhai, Ameet Cohen, Alexander T. O’Neill, Mark Clifton, David Gordon, Jason Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning |
title | Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning |
title_full | Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning |
title_fullStr | Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning |
title_short | Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning |
title_sort | predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillnathanr predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT ayoubkhanidaniel predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT mcewanphil predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT sugruedanielm predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT farooquiusman predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT listersteven predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT lumleymatthew predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT bakhaiameet predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT cohenalexandert predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT oneillmark predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT cliftondavid predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning AT gordonjason predictingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareusingmachinelearning |