Cargando…

Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso

OBJECTIVES: In resource-limited settings, screening pregnant women for syphilis using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is a key tool in the prevention of congenital syphilis. However, most syphilis RDTs detect only treponemal antibodies (T-RDT), meaning antibiotics may be provided unnecessarily to prev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langendorf, Céline, Lastrucci, Céline, Sanou-Bicaba, Isabelle, Blackburn, Kara, Koudika, Marie-Hortense, Crucitti, Tania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053722
_version_ 1783464758521888768
author Langendorf, Céline
Lastrucci, Céline
Sanou-Bicaba, Isabelle
Blackburn, Kara
Koudika, Marie-Hortense
Crucitti, Tania
author_facet Langendorf, Céline
Lastrucci, Céline
Sanou-Bicaba, Isabelle
Blackburn, Kara
Koudika, Marie-Hortense
Crucitti, Tania
author_sort Langendorf, Céline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In resource-limited settings, screening pregnant women for syphilis using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is a key tool in the prevention of congenital syphilis. However, most syphilis RDTs detect only treponemal antibodies (T-RDT), meaning antibiotics may be provided unnecessarily to previously treated pregnant women, particularly in non-venereal treponematoses endemic regions. We estimated the potential reduction in overtreatment when comparing T-RDT (SD Bioline) to a newer rapid test (Dual Path Platform (DPP) Screen and Confirm Assay, Chembio) detecting both treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies. METHODS: Pregnant women in Déou, Burkina Faso, screened for syphilis during antenatal care (ANC) visits were prospectively enrolled in the study after providing consent. DPP and T-RDT tests were performed on whole blood specimens. Plasma was tested in an international reference laboratory by Treponema pallidum passive particle agglutination (TPPA) and quantitative rapid plasma reagin (RPR). Presumptive active syphilis was defined as a result that was both TPPA and RPR reactive. RESULTS: Of the 242 pregnant women included in the study, 91 (37.6%) had presumptive active syphilis and 19.0% had RPR titres ≥8. DPP testing did not reduce the number of pregnant women who would have been overtreated compared with T-RDT (0.0% vs 2.5%; p=0.218) and had a higher proportion of underdiagnosis (48.4% vs 2.2%; p<0.001). Seven women with high RPR titres ≥8 would not have received treatment had only DPP testing been used. CONCLUSION: In the first evaluation comparing DPP with traditional screening methods in pregnant women, we saw no reduction in unnecessarily treated syphilis and an underestimation of those needing treatment. High seroprevalence in the population may indicate the presence of other treponemal infections in the area, and further study of DPP in a variety of Sahelian and other contexts is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6824609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68246092019-11-18 Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso Langendorf, Céline Lastrucci, Céline Sanou-Bicaba, Isabelle Blackburn, Kara Koudika, Marie-Hortense Crucitti, Tania Sex Transm Infect Clinical OBJECTIVES: In resource-limited settings, screening pregnant women for syphilis using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is a key tool in the prevention of congenital syphilis. However, most syphilis RDTs detect only treponemal antibodies (T-RDT), meaning antibiotics may be provided unnecessarily to previously treated pregnant women, particularly in non-venereal treponematoses endemic regions. We estimated the potential reduction in overtreatment when comparing T-RDT (SD Bioline) to a newer rapid test (Dual Path Platform (DPP) Screen and Confirm Assay, Chembio) detecting both treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies. METHODS: Pregnant women in Déou, Burkina Faso, screened for syphilis during antenatal care (ANC) visits were prospectively enrolled in the study after providing consent. DPP and T-RDT tests were performed on whole blood specimens. Plasma was tested in an international reference laboratory by Treponema pallidum passive particle agglutination (TPPA) and quantitative rapid plasma reagin (RPR). Presumptive active syphilis was defined as a result that was both TPPA and RPR reactive. RESULTS: Of the 242 pregnant women included in the study, 91 (37.6%) had presumptive active syphilis and 19.0% had RPR titres ≥8. DPP testing did not reduce the number of pregnant women who would have been overtreated compared with T-RDT (0.0% vs 2.5%; p=0.218) and had a higher proportion of underdiagnosis (48.4% vs 2.2%; p<0.001). Seven women with high RPR titres ≥8 would not have received treatment had only DPP testing been used. CONCLUSION: In the first evaluation comparing DPP with traditional screening methods in pregnant women, we saw no reduction in unnecessarily treated syphilis and an underestimation of those needing treatment. High seroprevalence in the population may indicate the presence of other treponemal infections in the area, and further study of DPP in a variety of Sahelian and other contexts is warranted. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09 2018-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6824609/ /pubmed/30580325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053722 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical
Langendorf, Céline
Lastrucci, Céline
Sanou-Bicaba, Isabelle
Blackburn, Kara
Koudika, Marie-Hortense
Crucitti, Tania
Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso
title Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso
title_full Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso
title_fullStr Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso
title_full_unstemmed Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso
title_short Dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in Burkina Faso
title_sort dual screen and confirm rapid test does not reduce overtreatment of syphilis in pregnant women living in a non-venereal treponematoses endemic region: a field evaluation among antenatal care attendees in burkina faso
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053722
work_keys_str_mv AT langendorfceline dualscreenandconfirmrapidtestdoesnotreduceovertreatmentofsyphilisinpregnantwomenlivinginanonvenerealtreponematosesendemicregionafieldevaluationamongantenatalcareattendeesinburkinafaso
AT lastrucciceline dualscreenandconfirmrapidtestdoesnotreduceovertreatmentofsyphilisinpregnantwomenlivinginanonvenerealtreponematosesendemicregionafieldevaluationamongantenatalcareattendeesinburkinafaso
AT sanoubicabaisabelle dualscreenandconfirmrapidtestdoesnotreduceovertreatmentofsyphilisinpregnantwomenlivinginanonvenerealtreponematosesendemicregionafieldevaluationamongantenatalcareattendeesinburkinafaso
AT blackburnkara dualscreenandconfirmrapidtestdoesnotreduceovertreatmentofsyphilisinpregnantwomenlivinginanonvenerealtreponematosesendemicregionafieldevaluationamongantenatalcareattendeesinburkinafaso
AT koudikamariehortense dualscreenandconfirmrapidtestdoesnotreduceovertreatmentofsyphilisinpregnantwomenlivinginanonvenerealtreponematosesendemicregionafieldevaluationamongantenatalcareattendeesinburkinafaso
AT crucittitania dualscreenandconfirmrapidtestdoesnotreduceovertreatmentofsyphilisinpregnantwomenlivinginanonvenerealtreponematosesendemicregionafieldevaluationamongantenatalcareattendeesinburkinafaso