Cargando…

Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Acupotomy is a miniature surgery instrument. It can cut and detach the abnormal, cicatricial, and contractured tissues by causing only microtrauma. Acupotomy has been widely used clinically with a satisfactory efficacy. With the development of ultrasound technology, ultrasound-guided acu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Zuyun, Jia, Yan, Shen, Yifeng, Zhou, Qiaoyin, Sun, Xiaojie, Zhu, Xinyue, Li, Shiliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017398
_version_ 1783464765205512192
author Qiu, Zuyun
Jia, Yan
Shen, Yifeng
Zhou, Qiaoyin
Sun, Xiaojie
Zhu, Xinyue
Li, Shiliang
author_facet Qiu, Zuyun
Jia, Yan
Shen, Yifeng
Zhou, Qiaoyin
Sun, Xiaojie
Zhu, Xinyue
Li, Shiliang
author_sort Qiu, Zuyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acupotomy is a miniature surgery instrument. It can cut and detach the abnormal, cicatricial, and contractured tissues by causing only microtrauma. Acupotomy has been widely used clinically with a satisfactory efficacy. With the development of ultrasound technology, ultrasound-guided acupotomy has shown great value in clinical practice. But it is not yet clear that ultrasound-guided acupotomy is very effective and safe. Therefore, it is important to re-evaluate the available evidence to reach a relatively convincing conclusion that acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique is a better choice than traditional acupotomy. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a method for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique. METHODS: This systematic review will be performed by searching relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without any language or publication status restriction from inception to December 2019 by 2 researchers in nine databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese literature databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database [CBM], China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], China Science and Journal Database [CSJD], and Wanfang Database). All RCTs evaluating acupotomy by the ultrasound-guided technique will be included in this study. Visual analog scale (VAS) and change of symptom will be assessed as the primary outcomes. The change in the ultrasound image, safety and adverse events, and acceptability will be assessed as secondary outcomes. The selection of study, data collection and analysis, and assessment of the study quality will be completed independently by 2 researchers. RevMan v.5.3 will be used for meta-analysis if no significant heterogeneity is detected. Continuous outcomes will be presented as the mean difference (MD) or standardized MD, while dichotomous data will be expressed as the relative risk. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of QL and AR to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique is an effective the efficacy and safety intervention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018109070.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6824636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68246362019-11-19 Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review Qiu, Zuyun Jia, Yan Shen, Yifeng Zhou, Qiaoyin Sun, Xiaojie Zhu, Xinyue Li, Shiliang Medicine (Baltimore) 5400 BACKGROUND: Acupotomy is a miniature surgery instrument. It can cut and detach the abnormal, cicatricial, and contractured tissues by causing only microtrauma. Acupotomy has been widely used clinically with a satisfactory efficacy. With the development of ultrasound technology, ultrasound-guided acupotomy has shown great value in clinical practice. But it is not yet clear that ultrasound-guided acupotomy is very effective and safe. Therefore, it is important to re-evaluate the available evidence to reach a relatively convincing conclusion that acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique is a better choice than traditional acupotomy. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a method for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique. METHODS: This systematic review will be performed by searching relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without any language or publication status restriction from inception to December 2019 by 2 researchers in nine databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese literature databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database [CBM], China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], China Science and Journal Database [CSJD], and Wanfang Database). All RCTs evaluating acupotomy by the ultrasound-guided technique will be included in this study. Visual analog scale (VAS) and change of symptom will be assessed as the primary outcomes. The change in the ultrasound image, safety and adverse events, and acceptability will be assessed as secondary outcomes. The selection of study, data collection and analysis, and assessment of the study quality will be completed independently by 2 researchers. RevMan v.5.3 will be used for meta-analysis if no significant heterogeneity is detected. Continuous outcomes will be presented as the mean difference (MD) or standardized MD, while dichotomous data will be expressed as the relative risk. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of QL and AR to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether acupotomy by ultrasound-guided technique is an effective the efficacy and safety intervention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018109070. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6824636/ /pubmed/31626093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017398 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5400
Qiu, Zuyun
Jia, Yan
Shen, Yifeng
Zhou, Qiaoyin
Sun, Xiaojie
Zhu, Xinyue
Li, Shiliang
Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review
title Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review
title_full Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review
title_short Acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: A protocol for a systematic review
title_sort acupotomy by an ultrasound-guided technique: a protocol for a systematic review
topic 5400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017398
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuzuyun acupotomybyanultrasoundguidedtechniqueaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT jiayan acupotomybyanultrasoundguidedtechniqueaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT shenyifeng acupotomybyanultrasoundguidedtechniqueaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT zhouqiaoyin acupotomybyanultrasoundguidedtechniqueaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT sunxiaojie acupotomybyanultrasoundguidedtechniqueaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT zhuxinyue acupotomybyanultrasoundguidedtechniqueaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT lishiliang acupotomybyanultrasoundguidedtechniqueaprotocolforasystematicreview