Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis approach on diagnostic value of MLH1 promoter methylation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the leading histological type among head and neck cancers. Several studies have explored an association between aberrant methylation of MutL homolog-1 (MLH1) promoter and HNSCC risk. We aimed to explore the associations between MLH1 promot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017651 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the leading histological type among head and neck cancers. Several studies have explored an association between aberrant methylation of MutL homolog-1 (MLH1) promoter and HNSCC risk. We aimed to explore the associations between MLH1 promoter methylation and HNSCC by using a meta-analysis. METHODS: Systematic literature search was conducted among PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases to retrieve relevant articles published up to June 30, 2018. A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis (including 717 HNSCC and 609 controls). RESULTS: The results demonstrated that MLH1 promoter methylation was notably higher in patients with HNSCC than in controls (odds ratios [ORs] = 2.52, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 1.33–4.79). Besides, MLH1 promoter methylation was not associated with tumor stage, lymph node status, smoking behavior, age, clinical stage, gender, and differentiation grade (all P > .05). The pooled sensitivity and specificity rates of MLH1 methylation for HNSCC were 0.23 (95% CI = 0.12–0.38) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82–0.99), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was presented as 0.64 (95% CI = 0.60-0.68). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggested that hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter was associated with HNSCC. Methylated MLH1 could be a potential diagnostic biomarker for diagnose of HNSCC. |
---|