Cargando…
Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
The anthocyanin content in leaves can reveal valuable information about a plant’s physiological status and its responses to stress. Therefore, it is of great value to accurately and efficiently determine anthocyanin content in leaves. The selection of calibration method is a major factor which can i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687285 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7997 |
_version_ | 1783464950007595008 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xiuying Liu, Chenzhou Shi, Zhaoyong Chang, Qingrui |
author_facet | Liu, Xiuying Liu, Chenzhou Shi, Zhaoyong Chang, Qingrui |
author_sort | Liu, Xiuying |
collection | PubMed |
description | The anthocyanin content in leaves can reveal valuable information about a plant’s physiological status and its responses to stress. Therefore, it is of great value to accurately and efficiently determine anthocyanin content in leaves. The selection of calibration method is a major factor which can influence the accuracy of measurement with visible and near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Three multivariate calibrations including principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) were adopted for the development of determination models of leaf anthocyanin content using reflectance spectra data (450–600 nm) in Prunus cerasifera and then the performance of these models was compared for three multivariate calibrations. Certain principal components (PCs) and latent variables (LVs) were used as input for the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model. The results showed that the best PCR and PLSR models were obtained by standard normal variate (SNV), and BPNN models outperformed both the PCR and PLSR models. The coefficient of determination (R(2)), the root mean square error of prediction (RMSE(p)), and the residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for the validation set were 0.920, 0.274, and 3.439, respectively, for the BPNN-PCs model, and 0.922, 0.270, and 3.489, respectively, for the BPNN-LVs model. Visible spectroscopy combined with BPNN was successfully applied to determine leaf anthocyanin content in P. cerasifera and the performance of the BPNN-LVs model was the best. The use of the BPNN-LVs model and visible spectroscopy showed significant potential for the nondestructive determination of leaf anthocyanin content in plants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6825749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68257492019-11-04 Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera Liu, Xiuying Liu, Chenzhou Shi, Zhaoyong Chang, Qingrui PeerJ Agricultural Science The anthocyanin content in leaves can reveal valuable information about a plant’s physiological status and its responses to stress. Therefore, it is of great value to accurately and efficiently determine anthocyanin content in leaves. The selection of calibration method is a major factor which can influence the accuracy of measurement with visible and near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Three multivariate calibrations including principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) were adopted for the development of determination models of leaf anthocyanin content using reflectance spectra data (450–600 nm) in Prunus cerasifera and then the performance of these models was compared for three multivariate calibrations. Certain principal components (PCs) and latent variables (LVs) were used as input for the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model. The results showed that the best PCR and PLSR models were obtained by standard normal variate (SNV), and BPNN models outperformed both the PCR and PLSR models. The coefficient of determination (R(2)), the root mean square error of prediction (RMSE(p)), and the residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for the validation set were 0.920, 0.274, and 3.439, respectively, for the BPNN-PCs model, and 0.922, 0.270, and 3.489, respectively, for the BPNN-LVs model. Visible spectroscopy combined with BPNN was successfully applied to determine leaf anthocyanin content in P. cerasifera and the performance of the BPNN-LVs model was the best. The use of the BPNN-LVs model and visible spectroscopy showed significant potential for the nondestructive determination of leaf anthocyanin content in plants. PeerJ Inc. 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6825749/ /pubmed/31687285 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7997 Text en ©2019 Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Agricultural Science Liu, Xiuying Liu, Chenzhou Shi, Zhaoyong Chang, Qingrui Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera |
title | Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera |
title_full | Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera |
title_fullStr | Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera |
title_short | Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera |
title_sort | comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in prunus cerasifera |
topic | Agricultural Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687285 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxiuying comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera AT liuchenzhou comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera AT shizhaoyong comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera AT changqingrui comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera |