Cargando…

Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera

The anthocyanin content in leaves can reveal valuable information about a plant’s physiological status and its responses to stress. Therefore, it is of great value to accurately and efficiently determine anthocyanin content in leaves. The selection of calibration method is a major factor which can i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiuying, Liu, Chenzhou, Shi, Zhaoyong, Chang, Qingrui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687285
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7997
_version_ 1783464950007595008
author Liu, Xiuying
Liu, Chenzhou
Shi, Zhaoyong
Chang, Qingrui
author_facet Liu, Xiuying
Liu, Chenzhou
Shi, Zhaoyong
Chang, Qingrui
author_sort Liu, Xiuying
collection PubMed
description The anthocyanin content in leaves can reveal valuable information about a plant’s physiological status and its responses to stress. Therefore, it is of great value to accurately and efficiently determine anthocyanin content in leaves. The selection of calibration method is a major factor which can influence the accuracy of measurement with visible and near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Three multivariate calibrations including principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) were adopted for the development of determination models of leaf anthocyanin content using reflectance spectra data (450–600 nm) in Prunus cerasifera and then the performance of these models was compared for three multivariate calibrations. Certain principal components (PCs) and latent variables (LVs) were used as input for the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model. The results showed that the best PCR and PLSR models were obtained by standard normal variate (SNV), and BPNN models outperformed both the PCR and PLSR models. The coefficient of determination (R(2)), the root mean square error of prediction (RMSE(p)), and the residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for the validation set were 0.920, 0.274, and 3.439, respectively, for the BPNN-PCs model, and 0.922, 0.270, and 3.489, respectively, for the BPNN-LVs model. Visible spectroscopy combined with BPNN was successfully applied to determine leaf anthocyanin content in P. cerasifera and the performance of the BPNN-LVs model was the best. The use of the BPNN-LVs model and visible spectroscopy showed significant potential for the nondestructive determination of leaf anthocyanin content in plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6825749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68257492019-11-04 Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera Liu, Xiuying Liu, Chenzhou Shi, Zhaoyong Chang, Qingrui PeerJ Agricultural Science The anthocyanin content in leaves can reveal valuable information about a plant’s physiological status and its responses to stress. Therefore, it is of great value to accurately and efficiently determine anthocyanin content in leaves. The selection of calibration method is a major factor which can influence the accuracy of measurement with visible and near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Three multivariate calibrations including principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) were adopted for the development of determination models of leaf anthocyanin content using reflectance spectra data (450–600 nm) in Prunus cerasifera and then the performance of these models was compared for three multivariate calibrations. Certain principal components (PCs) and latent variables (LVs) were used as input for the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model. The results showed that the best PCR and PLSR models were obtained by standard normal variate (SNV), and BPNN models outperformed both the PCR and PLSR models. The coefficient of determination (R(2)), the root mean square error of prediction (RMSE(p)), and the residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for the validation set were 0.920, 0.274, and 3.439, respectively, for the BPNN-PCs model, and 0.922, 0.270, and 3.489, respectively, for the BPNN-LVs model. Visible spectroscopy combined with BPNN was successfully applied to determine leaf anthocyanin content in P. cerasifera and the performance of the BPNN-LVs model was the best. The use of the BPNN-LVs model and visible spectroscopy showed significant potential for the nondestructive determination of leaf anthocyanin content in plants. PeerJ Inc. 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6825749/ /pubmed/31687285 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7997 Text en ©2019 Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Liu, Xiuying
Liu, Chenzhou
Shi, Zhaoyong
Chang, Qingrui
Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
title Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
title_full Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
title_fullStr Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
title_short Comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in Prunus cerasifera
title_sort comparison of prediction power of three multivariate calibrations for estimation of leaf anthocyanin content with visible spectroscopy in prunus cerasifera
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687285
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7997
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiuying comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera
AT liuchenzhou comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera
AT shizhaoyong comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera
AT changqingrui comparisonofpredictionpowerofthreemultivariatecalibrationsforestimationofleafanthocyanincontentwithvisiblespectroscopyinprunuscerasifera