Cargando…
Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
Captive breeding has been used as an effective approach to protecting endangered animals but its effect on the gut microbiome and the conservation status of these species is largely unknown. The giant panda is a flagship species for the conservation of wildlife. With integrated efforts including cap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100827 |
_version_ | 1783465075261046784 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Wei Mishra, Sudhanshu Wang, Chengdong Zhang, Hemin Ning, Ruihong Kong, Fanli Zeng, Bo Zhao, Jiangchao Li, Ying |
author_facet | Guo, Wei Mishra, Sudhanshu Wang, Chengdong Zhang, Hemin Ning, Ruihong Kong, Fanli Zeng, Bo Zhao, Jiangchao Li, Ying |
author_sort | Guo, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Captive breeding has been used as an effective approach to protecting endangered animals but its effect on the gut microbiome and the conservation status of these species is largely unknown. The giant panda is a flagship species for the conservation of wildlife. With integrated efforts including captive breeding, this species has been recently upgraded from “endangered” to “vulnerable” (IUCN 2016). Since a large proportion (21.8%) of their global population is still captive, it is critical to understand how captivity changes the gut microbiome of these pandas and how such alterations to the microbiome might affect their future fitness and potential impact on the ecosystem after release into the wild. Here, we use 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) marker gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics sequencing to demonstrate that the fecal microbiomes differ substantially between wild and captive giant pandas. Fecal microbiome diversity was significantly lower in captive pandas, as was the diversity of functional genes. Additionally, captive pandas have reduced functional potential for cellulose degradation but enriched metabolic pathways for starch metabolism, indicating that they may not adapt to a wild diet after being released into the wild since a major component of their diet in the wild will be bamboo. Most significantly, we observed a significantly higher level of amylase activity but a lower level of cellulase activity in captive giant panda feces than those of wild giant pandas, shown by an in vitro experimental assay. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors, as well as heavy metal tolerance genes were enriched in the microbiomes of captive pandas, which raises a great concern of spreading these genes to other wild animals and ecosystems when they are released into a wild environment. Our results clearly show that captivity has altered the giant panda microbiome, which could have unintended negative consequences on their adaptability and the ecosystem during the reintroduction of giant pandas into the wild. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6826394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68263942019-11-18 Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) Guo, Wei Mishra, Sudhanshu Wang, Chengdong Zhang, Hemin Ning, Ruihong Kong, Fanli Zeng, Bo Zhao, Jiangchao Li, Ying Genes (Basel) Article Captive breeding has been used as an effective approach to protecting endangered animals but its effect on the gut microbiome and the conservation status of these species is largely unknown. The giant panda is a flagship species for the conservation of wildlife. With integrated efforts including captive breeding, this species has been recently upgraded from “endangered” to “vulnerable” (IUCN 2016). Since a large proportion (21.8%) of their global population is still captive, it is critical to understand how captivity changes the gut microbiome of these pandas and how such alterations to the microbiome might affect their future fitness and potential impact on the ecosystem after release into the wild. Here, we use 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) marker gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics sequencing to demonstrate that the fecal microbiomes differ substantially between wild and captive giant pandas. Fecal microbiome diversity was significantly lower in captive pandas, as was the diversity of functional genes. Additionally, captive pandas have reduced functional potential for cellulose degradation but enriched metabolic pathways for starch metabolism, indicating that they may not adapt to a wild diet after being released into the wild since a major component of their diet in the wild will be bamboo. Most significantly, we observed a significantly higher level of amylase activity but a lower level of cellulase activity in captive giant panda feces than those of wild giant pandas, shown by an in vitro experimental assay. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors, as well as heavy metal tolerance genes were enriched in the microbiomes of captive pandas, which raises a great concern of spreading these genes to other wild animals and ecosystems when they are released into a wild environment. Our results clearly show that captivity has altered the giant panda microbiome, which could have unintended negative consequences on their adaptability and the ecosystem during the reintroduction of giant pandas into the wild. MDPI 2019-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6826394/ /pubmed/31635158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100827 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Guo, Wei Mishra, Sudhanshu Wang, Chengdong Zhang, Hemin Ning, Ruihong Kong, Fanli Zeng, Bo Zhao, Jiangchao Li, Ying Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) |
title | Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) |
title_full | Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) |
title_short | Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) |
title_sort | comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive giant pandas (ailuropoda melanoleuca) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guowei comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT mishrasudhanshu comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT wangchengdong comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT zhanghemin comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT ningruihong comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT kongfanli comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT zengbo comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT zhaojiangchao comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca AT liying comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca |