Cargando…

Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)

Captive breeding has been used as an effective approach to protecting endangered animals but its effect on the gut microbiome and the conservation status of these species is largely unknown. The giant panda is a flagship species for the conservation of wildlife. With integrated efforts including cap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Wei, Mishra, Sudhanshu, Wang, Chengdong, Zhang, Hemin, Ning, Ruihong, Kong, Fanli, Zeng, Bo, Zhao, Jiangchao, Li, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100827
_version_ 1783465075261046784
author Guo, Wei
Mishra, Sudhanshu
Wang, Chengdong
Zhang, Hemin
Ning, Ruihong
Kong, Fanli
Zeng, Bo
Zhao, Jiangchao
Li, Ying
author_facet Guo, Wei
Mishra, Sudhanshu
Wang, Chengdong
Zhang, Hemin
Ning, Ruihong
Kong, Fanli
Zeng, Bo
Zhao, Jiangchao
Li, Ying
author_sort Guo, Wei
collection PubMed
description Captive breeding has been used as an effective approach to protecting endangered animals but its effect on the gut microbiome and the conservation status of these species is largely unknown. The giant panda is a flagship species for the conservation of wildlife. With integrated efforts including captive breeding, this species has been recently upgraded from “endangered” to “vulnerable” (IUCN 2016). Since a large proportion (21.8%) of their global population is still captive, it is critical to understand how captivity changes the gut microbiome of these pandas and how such alterations to the microbiome might affect their future fitness and potential impact on the ecosystem after release into the wild. Here, we use 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) marker gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics sequencing to demonstrate that the fecal microbiomes differ substantially between wild and captive giant pandas. Fecal microbiome diversity was significantly lower in captive pandas, as was the diversity of functional genes. Additionally, captive pandas have reduced functional potential for cellulose degradation but enriched metabolic pathways for starch metabolism, indicating that they may not adapt to a wild diet after being released into the wild since a major component of their diet in the wild will be bamboo. Most significantly, we observed a significantly higher level of amylase activity but a lower level of cellulase activity in captive giant panda feces than those of wild giant pandas, shown by an in vitro experimental assay. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors, as well as heavy metal tolerance genes were enriched in the microbiomes of captive pandas, which raises a great concern of spreading these genes to other wild animals and ecosystems when they are released into a wild environment. Our results clearly show that captivity has altered the giant panda microbiome, which could have unintended negative consequences on their adaptability and the ecosystem during the reintroduction of giant pandas into the wild.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6826394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68263942019-11-18 Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) Guo, Wei Mishra, Sudhanshu Wang, Chengdong Zhang, Hemin Ning, Ruihong Kong, Fanli Zeng, Bo Zhao, Jiangchao Li, Ying Genes (Basel) Article Captive breeding has been used as an effective approach to protecting endangered animals but its effect on the gut microbiome and the conservation status of these species is largely unknown. The giant panda is a flagship species for the conservation of wildlife. With integrated efforts including captive breeding, this species has been recently upgraded from “endangered” to “vulnerable” (IUCN 2016). Since a large proportion (21.8%) of their global population is still captive, it is critical to understand how captivity changes the gut microbiome of these pandas and how such alterations to the microbiome might affect their future fitness and potential impact on the ecosystem after release into the wild. Here, we use 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) marker gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics sequencing to demonstrate that the fecal microbiomes differ substantially between wild and captive giant pandas. Fecal microbiome diversity was significantly lower in captive pandas, as was the diversity of functional genes. Additionally, captive pandas have reduced functional potential for cellulose degradation but enriched metabolic pathways for starch metabolism, indicating that they may not adapt to a wild diet after being released into the wild since a major component of their diet in the wild will be bamboo. Most significantly, we observed a significantly higher level of amylase activity but a lower level of cellulase activity in captive giant panda feces than those of wild giant pandas, shown by an in vitro experimental assay. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors, as well as heavy metal tolerance genes were enriched in the microbiomes of captive pandas, which raises a great concern of spreading these genes to other wild animals and ecosystems when they are released into a wild environment. Our results clearly show that captivity has altered the giant panda microbiome, which could have unintended negative consequences on their adaptability and the ecosystem during the reintroduction of giant pandas into the wild. MDPI 2019-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6826394/ /pubmed/31635158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100827 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Wei
Mishra, Sudhanshu
Wang, Chengdong
Zhang, Hemin
Ning, Ruihong
Kong, Fanli
Zeng, Bo
Zhao, Jiangchao
Li, Ying
Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
title Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
title_full Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
title_short Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
title_sort comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive giant pandas (ailuropoda melanoleuca)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31635158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100827
work_keys_str_mv AT guowei comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT mishrasudhanshu comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT wangchengdong comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT zhanghemin comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT ningruihong comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT kongfanli comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT zengbo comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT zhaojiangchao comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca
AT liying comparativestudyofgutmicrobiotainwildandcaptivegiantpandasailuropodamelanoleuca