Cargando…

Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Tail biting is a common problem within modern pig production and is mainly an indicator of poor housing environment where the behavioural needs of pigs are not met. Tail biting causes pain and can result in infection, leading to reduced pig growth and reduced farm profits. In order t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallgren, Torun, Lundeheim, Nils, Wallenbeck, Anna, Westin, Rebecka, Gunnarsson, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9100812
_version_ 1783465089500708864
author Wallgren, Torun
Lundeheim, Nils
Wallenbeck, Anna
Westin, Rebecka
Gunnarsson, Stefan
author_facet Wallgren, Torun
Lundeheim, Nils
Wallenbeck, Anna
Westin, Rebecka
Gunnarsson, Stefan
author_sort Wallgren, Torun
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Tail biting is a common problem within modern pig production and is mainly an indicator of poor housing environment where the behavioural needs of pigs are not met. Tail biting causes pain and can result in infection, leading to reduced pig growth and reduced farm profits. In order to prevent tail biting, pigs are often tail docked, without pain relief, within the first week of life. The EU Directive condemns routine tail docking and advises that tail biting can be prevented through improving the environment of pigs. In Sweden, tail docking is banned and all pigs are reared with intact tails. This paper summarises knowledge from Swedish production of undocked pigs and describes practical solutions in use in Sweden that can be applied to pig production in other EU Member States. Housing conditions and management within Swedish pig production, such as stocking density and feeding space, differ in many aspects from those in other EU countries. To prevent tail biting and eliminate the need for tail docking, EU legislation should more clearly match with the biological needs of pigs. ABSTRACT: Tail biting is a common issue within commercial pig production. It is mainly an indicator of inadequate housing environment and results in reduced health welfare and production. To reduce the impact of tail biting, pigs are commonly tail docked, without pain relief, within the first week of life. EU Council Directive 2008/120/EC prohibits routine tail docking, but the practice is still widely used in many Member States. Sweden has banned tail docking since 1988 and all pigs have intact tails, yet tail biting is a minor problem. This paper summarises and synthesises experimental findings and practical expertise in production of undocked pigs in Sweden and describes solutions to facilitate a transition to producing pigs with intact tails within intensive pig production in the EU. Swedish pig housing conditions and management differ in many aspects from those in other EU Member States. Swedish experiences show that lower stocking density, provision of sufficient feeding space, no fully slatted flooring, strict maximum levels for noxious gases and regular provision of litter material are crucial for success when rearing pigs with intact tails. To prevent tail biting and to eliminate the need for tail docking, we strongly recommend that EU legislation should more clearly match the biological needs of pigs, as is done in Swedish legislation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6826450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68264502019-11-18 Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden Wallgren, Torun Lundeheim, Nils Wallenbeck, Anna Westin, Rebecka Gunnarsson, Stefan Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Tail biting is a common problem within modern pig production and is mainly an indicator of poor housing environment where the behavioural needs of pigs are not met. Tail biting causes pain and can result in infection, leading to reduced pig growth and reduced farm profits. In order to prevent tail biting, pigs are often tail docked, without pain relief, within the first week of life. The EU Directive condemns routine tail docking and advises that tail biting can be prevented through improving the environment of pigs. In Sweden, tail docking is banned and all pigs are reared with intact tails. This paper summarises knowledge from Swedish production of undocked pigs and describes practical solutions in use in Sweden that can be applied to pig production in other EU Member States. Housing conditions and management within Swedish pig production, such as stocking density and feeding space, differ in many aspects from those in other EU countries. To prevent tail biting and eliminate the need for tail docking, EU legislation should more clearly match with the biological needs of pigs. ABSTRACT: Tail biting is a common issue within commercial pig production. It is mainly an indicator of inadequate housing environment and results in reduced health welfare and production. To reduce the impact of tail biting, pigs are commonly tail docked, without pain relief, within the first week of life. EU Council Directive 2008/120/EC prohibits routine tail docking, but the practice is still widely used in many Member States. Sweden has banned tail docking since 1988 and all pigs have intact tails, yet tail biting is a minor problem. This paper summarises and synthesises experimental findings and practical expertise in production of undocked pigs in Sweden and describes solutions to facilitate a transition to producing pigs with intact tails within intensive pig production in the EU. Swedish pig housing conditions and management differ in many aspects from those in other EU Member States. Swedish experiences show that lower stocking density, provision of sufficient feeding space, no fully slatted flooring, strict maximum levels for noxious gases and regular provision of litter material are crucial for success when rearing pigs with intact tails. To prevent tail biting and to eliminate the need for tail docking, we strongly recommend that EU legislation should more clearly match the biological needs of pigs, as is done in Swedish legislation. MDPI 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6826450/ /pubmed/31619014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9100812 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wallgren, Torun
Lundeheim, Nils
Wallenbeck, Anna
Westin, Rebecka
Gunnarsson, Stefan
Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden
title Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden
title_full Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden
title_fullStr Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden
title_short Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails—Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden
title_sort rearing pigs with intact tails—experiences and practical solutions in sweden
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9100812
work_keys_str_mv AT wallgrentorun rearingpigswithintacttailsexperiencesandpracticalsolutionsinsweden
AT lundeheimnils rearingpigswithintacttailsexperiencesandpracticalsolutionsinsweden
AT wallenbeckanna rearingpigswithintacttailsexperiencesandpracticalsolutionsinsweden
AT westinrebecka rearingpigswithintacttailsexperiencesandpracticalsolutionsinsweden
AT gunnarssonstefan rearingpigswithintacttailsexperiencesandpracticalsolutionsinsweden