Cargando…
Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking
BACKGROUND: Contact lenses (CLs) remain the mainstay in improving vision in patients having keratoconus. With corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) performed worldwide, whether the same CLs can be used or needs replacement needed to be assessed and considered. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evalu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902993 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_43_2018 |
_version_ | 1783465126547947520 |
---|---|
author | Mandathara, Preeji Suderman Kalaiselvan, Parthasarathi Rathi, Varsha M. Murthy, Somasheila I. Taneja, Mukesh Sangwan, Virender S. |
author_facet | Mandathara, Preeji Suderman Kalaiselvan, Parthasarathi Rathi, Varsha M. Murthy, Somasheila I. Taneja, Mukesh Sangwan, Virender S. |
author_sort | Mandathara, Preeji Suderman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contact lenses (CLs) remain the mainstay in improving vision in patients having keratoconus. With corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) performed worldwide, whether the same CLs can be used or needs replacement needed to be assessed and considered. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in CL fitting following CXL. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent CXL and used CL. Data collected included demographics, pre- and post-CXL refraction, corneal topography, anterior-segment examination, and CL [rigid gas permeable(RGP)] fitting details and duration between CXL and RGP fitting. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis and paired t-test were used to compare the pre- and post-CXL data on refraction, visual acuity, and CL parameters. The statistical significance was kept at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes (keratoconus = 32, pellucid marginal degeneration = 1, and post-LASIK ectasia = 1) of 27 patients who used CL before and after undergoing CXL were analyzed. Mean duration between CXL and RGP lens use was 2.53 months. Mean sphere and cylinder post-CXL was −4.11 ± 4.32 D and −3.54 ± 2.51 D, respectively. A mean change of 0.75 ± 3.72 D sphere and 0.71 ± 3.39 D cylinder was noted post-CXL. The post-CXL best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (CVA) was 0.52 ± 0.36 and with RGP lens it was 0.09 ± 0.18. There was no significant difference in pre- and post-CXL RGP lens CVA (0.07 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.18, respectively; P = 0.556). Pre-CXL, 3-point-touch fitting was in 24 eyes (70.59%) and central fluorescein pooling was in 10 eyes (29.41%). Post-CXL, 30 eyes (88.24%) had 3-point-touch and central fluorescein pooling was found in four eyes (11.76%). One patient had CL intolerance after CXL. Of the 32 keratoconus eyes, 62.5% (n = 20 eyes) were prescribed new lenses; 37.5% (n = 12 eyes) continued using own lenses. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in refraction, topography indices, and RGP lens parameters pre- and post-CXL. However, changes in RGP lens fitting characteristics suggest a possible change in shape or apex location of the cornea after CXL. RGP lenses remain the best option to improve visual acuity after CXL in corneal ectasia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6826600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68266002020-01-03 Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking Mandathara, Preeji Suderman Kalaiselvan, Parthasarathi Rathi, Varsha M. Murthy, Somasheila I. Taneja, Mukesh Sangwan, Virender S. Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article BACKGROUND: Contact lenses (CLs) remain the mainstay in improving vision in patients having keratoconus. With corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) performed worldwide, whether the same CLs can be used or needs replacement needed to be assessed and considered. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in CL fitting following CXL. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent CXL and used CL. Data collected included demographics, pre- and post-CXL refraction, corneal topography, anterior-segment examination, and CL [rigid gas permeable(RGP)] fitting details and duration between CXL and RGP fitting. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis and paired t-test were used to compare the pre- and post-CXL data on refraction, visual acuity, and CL parameters. The statistical significance was kept at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes (keratoconus = 32, pellucid marginal degeneration = 1, and post-LASIK ectasia = 1) of 27 patients who used CL before and after undergoing CXL were analyzed. Mean duration between CXL and RGP lens use was 2.53 months. Mean sphere and cylinder post-CXL was −4.11 ± 4.32 D and −3.54 ± 2.51 D, respectively. A mean change of 0.75 ± 3.72 D sphere and 0.71 ± 3.39 D cylinder was noted post-CXL. The post-CXL best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (CVA) was 0.52 ± 0.36 and with RGP lens it was 0.09 ± 0.18. There was no significant difference in pre- and post-CXL RGP lens CVA (0.07 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.18, respectively; P = 0.556). Pre-CXL, 3-point-touch fitting was in 24 eyes (70.59%) and central fluorescein pooling was in 10 eyes (29.41%). Post-CXL, 30 eyes (88.24%) had 3-point-touch and central fluorescein pooling was found in four eyes (11.76%). One patient had CL intolerance after CXL. Of the 32 keratoconus eyes, 62.5% (n = 20 eyes) were prescribed new lenses; 37.5% (n = 12 eyes) continued using own lenses. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in refraction, topography indices, and RGP lens parameters pre- and post-CXL. However, changes in RGP lens fitting characteristics suggest a possible change in shape or apex location of the cornea after CXL. RGP lenses remain the best option to improve visual acuity after CXL in corneal ectasia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6826600/ /pubmed/31902993 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_43_2018 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Oman Ophthalmic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mandathara, Preeji Suderman Kalaiselvan, Parthasarathi Rathi, Varsha M. Murthy, Somasheila I. Taneja, Mukesh Sangwan, Virender S. Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking |
title | Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking |
title_full | Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking |
title_fullStr | Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking |
title_full_unstemmed | Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking |
title_short | Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking |
title_sort | contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31902993 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_43_2018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mandatharapreejisuderman contactlensfittingaftercornealcollagencrosslinking AT kalaiselvanparthasarathi contactlensfittingaftercornealcollagencrosslinking AT rathivarsham contactlensfittingaftercornealcollagencrosslinking AT murthysomasheilai contactlensfittingaftercornealcollagencrosslinking AT tanejamukesh contactlensfittingaftercornealcollagencrosslinking AT sangwanvirenders contactlensfittingaftercornealcollagencrosslinking |