Cargando…

Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Behaviour problems are among the most common reasons owners give for relinquishing their dog to a rehoming centre. Dog training and owner education classes can help prevent behaviour problems, but some people may not attend these due to cost and other barriers, particularly people on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Lauren, Durston, Tamsin, Flatman, Jake, Kelly, Denise, Moat, Michelle, Mohammed, Rahana, Smith, Tracey, Wickes, Maria, Upjohn, Melissa, Casey, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652507
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9100849
_version_ 1783465145634127872
author Harris, Lauren
Durston, Tamsin
Flatman, Jake
Kelly, Denise
Moat, Michelle
Mohammed, Rahana
Smith, Tracey
Wickes, Maria
Upjohn, Melissa
Casey, Rachel
author_facet Harris, Lauren
Durston, Tamsin
Flatman, Jake
Kelly, Denise
Moat, Michelle
Mohammed, Rahana
Smith, Tracey
Wickes, Maria
Upjohn, Melissa
Casey, Rachel
author_sort Harris, Lauren
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Behaviour problems are among the most common reasons owners give for relinquishing their dog to a rehoming centre. Dog training and owner education classes can help prevent behaviour problems, but some people may not attend these due to cost and other barriers, particularly people on low incomes. This study compared the engagement of dog owners recruited in areas with high levels of socio-economic deprivation who were offered free face-to-face dog training classes or an online dog training course. The study aimed to find out whether the online or the face-to-face formats were better at reducing barriers to learning about dog behaviour. There were high dropout rates from both types of courses; none of the participants finished the online course, and 43% of people did not reach the end of the face-to-face classes. A course of paid dog training classes with similar content, running in the same geographic area, had a comparatively low dropout rate (24%). Participants who completed the free face-to-face classes had significantly higher household incomes and were less likely to receive means-tested benefits than participants who dropped out. This evidence suggests that low income dog owners may face other barriers to attending dog training classes, aside from, or in addition to, cost. Future research should investigate people’s reasons for not continuing with dog training courses in order to support the development of training and behaviour advice delivery that is accessible to everyone. ABSTRACT: Behaviour problems are amongst the most common reasons given for relinquishing dogs to rehoming centres. Some behaviour problems may be amenable to being tackled pre-emptively with classes educating owners on basic dog training and understanding behaviour; however, it is recognised that people with low socio-economic status (SES) may face barriers to attending classes such as affordability, variable working hours, and limited access to transport and childcare. The current study piloted free-to-use dog training and owner education classes in areas with high levels of economic deprivation, both in the traditional face-to-face format and online. It was hypothesised that providing an online dog training course may help people overcome practical barriers by allowing them to complete training modules in their own time. High dropout rates were observed in both formats (online: 100%, face-to-face: 43% dropout). A course of paid dog training classes running in the same area saw a comparatively low dropout rate (24%). Participants who completed the face-to-face classes had significantly higher household incomes and were less likely to receive means-tested benefits than participants who dropped out (household income p = 0.049; benefits status p = 0.017). This evidence suggests that people with low SES may face non-course fee-related barriers to attending dog training classes. Future research should include a qualitative investigation of people’s reasons for not continuing with dog training courses. Study findings can support the development of training and behaviour advice delivery that is accessible to people with varied socio-economic backgrounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6826670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68266702019-11-18 Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes Harris, Lauren Durston, Tamsin Flatman, Jake Kelly, Denise Moat, Michelle Mohammed, Rahana Smith, Tracey Wickes, Maria Upjohn, Melissa Casey, Rachel Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Behaviour problems are among the most common reasons owners give for relinquishing their dog to a rehoming centre. Dog training and owner education classes can help prevent behaviour problems, but some people may not attend these due to cost and other barriers, particularly people on low incomes. This study compared the engagement of dog owners recruited in areas with high levels of socio-economic deprivation who were offered free face-to-face dog training classes or an online dog training course. The study aimed to find out whether the online or the face-to-face formats were better at reducing barriers to learning about dog behaviour. There were high dropout rates from both types of courses; none of the participants finished the online course, and 43% of people did not reach the end of the face-to-face classes. A course of paid dog training classes with similar content, running in the same geographic area, had a comparatively low dropout rate (24%). Participants who completed the free face-to-face classes had significantly higher household incomes and were less likely to receive means-tested benefits than participants who dropped out. This evidence suggests that low income dog owners may face other barriers to attending dog training classes, aside from, or in addition to, cost. Future research should investigate people’s reasons for not continuing with dog training courses in order to support the development of training and behaviour advice delivery that is accessible to everyone. ABSTRACT: Behaviour problems are amongst the most common reasons given for relinquishing dogs to rehoming centres. Some behaviour problems may be amenable to being tackled pre-emptively with classes educating owners on basic dog training and understanding behaviour; however, it is recognised that people with low socio-economic status (SES) may face barriers to attending classes such as affordability, variable working hours, and limited access to transport and childcare. The current study piloted free-to-use dog training and owner education classes in areas with high levels of economic deprivation, both in the traditional face-to-face format and online. It was hypothesised that providing an online dog training course may help people overcome practical barriers by allowing them to complete training modules in their own time. High dropout rates were observed in both formats (online: 100%, face-to-face: 43% dropout). A course of paid dog training classes running in the same area saw a comparatively low dropout rate (24%). Participants who completed the face-to-face classes had significantly higher household incomes and were less likely to receive means-tested benefits than participants who dropped out (household income p = 0.049; benefits status p = 0.017). This evidence suggests that people with low SES may face non-course fee-related barriers to attending dog training classes. Future research should include a qualitative investigation of people’s reasons for not continuing with dog training courses. Study findings can support the development of training and behaviour advice delivery that is accessible to people with varied socio-economic backgrounds. MDPI 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6826670/ /pubmed/31652507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9100849 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Harris, Lauren
Durston, Tamsin
Flatman, Jake
Kelly, Denise
Moat, Michelle
Mohammed, Rahana
Smith, Tracey
Wickes, Maria
Upjohn, Melissa
Casey, Rachel
Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes
title Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes
title_full Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes
title_fullStr Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes
title_short Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Accessibility of Dog Training Classes
title_sort impact of socio-economic status on accessibility of dog training classes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652507
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9100849
work_keys_str_mv AT harrislauren impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT durstontamsin impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT flatmanjake impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT kellydenise impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT moatmichelle impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT mohammedrahana impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT smithtracey impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT wickesmaria impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT upjohnmelissa impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses
AT caseyrachel impactofsocioeconomicstatusonaccessibilityofdogtrainingclasses