Cargando…
DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning
For cancer diagnosis, many DNA methylation markers have been identified. However, few studies have tried to identify DNA methylation markers to diagnose diverse cancer types simultaneously, i.e., pan-cancers. In this study, we tried to identify DNA methylation markers to differentiate cancer samples...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100778 |
_version_ | 1783465172690534400 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Biao Liu, Yulu Pan, Xingxin Li, Mengyao Yang, Shuang Li, Shuai Cheng |
author_facet | Liu, Biao Liu, Yulu Pan, Xingxin Li, Mengyao Yang, Shuang Li, Shuai Cheng |
author_sort | Liu, Biao |
collection | PubMed |
description | For cancer diagnosis, many DNA methylation markers have been identified. However, few studies have tried to identify DNA methylation markers to diagnose diverse cancer types simultaneously, i.e., pan-cancers. In this study, we tried to identify DNA methylation markers to differentiate cancer samples from the respective normal samples in pan-cancers. We collected whole genome methylation data of 27 cancer types containing 10,140 cancer samples and 3386 normal samples, and divided all samples into five data sets, including one training data set, one validation data set and three test data sets. We applied machine learning to identify DNA methylation markers, and specifically, we constructed diagnostic prediction models by deep learning. We identified two categories of markers: 12 CpG markers and 13 promoter markers. Three of 12 CpG markers and four of 13 promoter markers locate at cancer-related genes. With the CpG markers, our model achieved an average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets as 92.8% and 90.1%, respectively. For promoter markers, the average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets were 89.8% and 81.1%, respectively. Furthermore, in cell-free DNA methylation data of 163 prostate cancer samples, the CpG markers achieved the sensitivity as 100%, and the promoter markers achieved 92%. For both marker types, the specificity of normal whole blood was 100%. To conclude, we identified methylation markers to diagnose pan-cancers, which might be applied to liquid biopsy of cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6826785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68267852019-11-18 DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning Liu, Biao Liu, Yulu Pan, Xingxin Li, Mengyao Yang, Shuang Li, Shuai Cheng Genes (Basel) Article For cancer diagnosis, many DNA methylation markers have been identified. However, few studies have tried to identify DNA methylation markers to diagnose diverse cancer types simultaneously, i.e., pan-cancers. In this study, we tried to identify DNA methylation markers to differentiate cancer samples from the respective normal samples in pan-cancers. We collected whole genome methylation data of 27 cancer types containing 10,140 cancer samples and 3386 normal samples, and divided all samples into five data sets, including one training data set, one validation data set and three test data sets. We applied machine learning to identify DNA methylation markers, and specifically, we constructed diagnostic prediction models by deep learning. We identified two categories of markers: 12 CpG markers and 13 promoter markers. Three of 12 CpG markers and four of 13 promoter markers locate at cancer-related genes. With the CpG markers, our model achieved an average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets as 92.8% and 90.1%, respectively. For promoter markers, the average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets were 89.8% and 81.1%, respectively. Furthermore, in cell-free DNA methylation data of 163 prostate cancer samples, the CpG markers achieved the sensitivity as 100%, and the promoter markers achieved 92%. For both marker types, the specificity of normal whole blood was 100%. To conclude, we identified methylation markers to diagnose pan-cancers, which might be applied to liquid biopsy of cancers. MDPI 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6826785/ /pubmed/31590287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100778 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Biao Liu, Yulu Pan, Xingxin Li, Mengyao Yang, Shuang Li, Shuai Cheng DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning |
title | DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning |
title_full | DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning |
title_fullStr | DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning |
title_short | DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning |
title_sort | dna methylation markers for pan-cancer prediction by deep learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liubiao dnamethylationmarkersforpancancerpredictionbydeeplearning AT liuyulu dnamethylationmarkersforpancancerpredictionbydeeplearning AT panxingxin dnamethylationmarkersforpancancerpredictionbydeeplearning AT limengyao dnamethylationmarkersforpancancerpredictionbydeeplearning AT yangshuang dnamethylationmarkersforpancancerpredictionbydeeplearning AT lishuaicheng dnamethylationmarkersforpancancerpredictionbydeeplearning |