Cargando…

Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as a collective group of heterogenous tumours, displays the highest rate of distant recurrence and lowest survival from metastatic disease across breast cancer subtypes. However, a subset of TNBC display impressive primary tumour response to neoadjuvant chemothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzpatrick, Amanda, Tutt, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31700549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919882581
_version_ 1783465205548711936
author Fitzpatrick, Amanda
Tutt, Andrew
author_facet Fitzpatrick, Amanda
Tutt, Andrew
author_sort Fitzpatrick, Amanda
collection PubMed
description Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as a collective group of heterogenous tumours, displays the highest rate of distant recurrence and lowest survival from metastatic disease across breast cancer subtypes. However, a subset of TNBC display impressive primary tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, translating to reduction in future relapse and increased overall survival. Maximizing early treatment response is crucial to improving the outlook in this subtype. Numerous systemic therapy strategies are being assessed in the neoadjuvant setting and the current paradigm of generic chemotherapy components in regimens for high-risk breast cancers, regardless of biological subtype, is changing. Therapeutic approaches with evidence of benefit include platinum drugs, polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immunotherapy and second adjuvant therapy for those not achieving pathological complete response. Importantly, molecular testing can identify subgroups within TNBC, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) homologous recombination repair deficiency, lymphocyte-predominant tumours, and TNBC type 4 molecular subtypes. Clinical trials that address the interaction between these biomarkers and treatment approaches are a priority, to identify subgroups benefiting from additional therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6826917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68269172019-11-07 Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer Fitzpatrick, Amanda Tutt, Andrew Ther Adv Med Oncol TNBC in 2019: Promising Signals for the Treatment of a Formidable Disease Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as a collective group of heterogenous tumours, displays the highest rate of distant recurrence and lowest survival from metastatic disease across breast cancer subtypes. However, a subset of TNBC display impressive primary tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, translating to reduction in future relapse and increased overall survival. Maximizing early treatment response is crucial to improving the outlook in this subtype. Numerous systemic therapy strategies are being assessed in the neoadjuvant setting and the current paradigm of generic chemotherapy components in regimens for high-risk breast cancers, regardless of biological subtype, is changing. Therapeutic approaches with evidence of benefit include platinum drugs, polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immunotherapy and second adjuvant therapy for those not achieving pathological complete response. Importantly, molecular testing can identify subgroups within TNBC, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) homologous recombination repair deficiency, lymphocyte-predominant tumours, and TNBC type 4 molecular subtypes. Clinical trials that address the interaction between these biomarkers and treatment approaches are a priority, to identify subgroups benefiting from additional therapy. SAGE Publications 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6826917/ /pubmed/31700549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919882581 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle TNBC in 2019: Promising Signals for the Treatment of a Formidable Disease
Fitzpatrick, Amanda
Tutt, Andrew
Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
title Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
title_full Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
title_fullStr Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
title_short Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
title_sort controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
topic TNBC in 2019: Promising Signals for the Treatment of a Formidable Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31700549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919882581
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickamanda controversialissuesintheneoadjuvanttreatmentoftriplenegativebreastcancer
AT tuttandrew controversialissuesintheneoadjuvanttreatmentoftriplenegativebreastcancer