Cargando…
Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as a collective group of heterogenous tumours, displays the highest rate of distant recurrence and lowest survival from metastatic disease across breast cancer subtypes. However, a subset of TNBC display impressive primary tumour response to neoadjuvant chemothe...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31700549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919882581 |
_version_ | 1783465205548711936 |
---|---|
author | Fitzpatrick, Amanda Tutt, Andrew |
author_facet | Fitzpatrick, Amanda Tutt, Andrew |
author_sort | Fitzpatrick, Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as a collective group of heterogenous tumours, displays the highest rate of distant recurrence and lowest survival from metastatic disease across breast cancer subtypes. However, a subset of TNBC display impressive primary tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, translating to reduction in future relapse and increased overall survival. Maximizing early treatment response is crucial to improving the outlook in this subtype. Numerous systemic therapy strategies are being assessed in the neoadjuvant setting and the current paradigm of generic chemotherapy components in regimens for high-risk breast cancers, regardless of biological subtype, is changing. Therapeutic approaches with evidence of benefit include platinum drugs, polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immunotherapy and second adjuvant therapy for those not achieving pathological complete response. Importantly, molecular testing can identify subgroups within TNBC, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) homologous recombination repair deficiency, lymphocyte-predominant tumours, and TNBC type 4 molecular subtypes. Clinical trials that address the interaction between these biomarkers and treatment approaches are a priority, to identify subgroups benefiting from additional therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6826917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68269172019-11-07 Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer Fitzpatrick, Amanda Tutt, Andrew Ther Adv Med Oncol TNBC in 2019: Promising Signals for the Treatment of a Formidable Disease Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as a collective group of heterogenous tumours, displays the highest rate of distant recurrence and lowest survival from metastatic disease across breast cancer subtypes. However, a subset of TNBC display impressive primary tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, translating to reduction in future relapse and increased overall survival. Maximizing early treatment response is crucial to improving the outlook in this subtype. Numerous systemic therapy strategies are being assessed in the neoadjuvant setting and the current paradigm of generic chemotherapy components in regimens for high-risk breast cancers, regardless of biological subtype, is changing. Therapeutic approaches with evidence of benefit include platinum drugs, polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immunotherapy and second adjuvant therapy for those not achieving pathological complete response. Importantly, molecular testing can identify subgroups within TNBC, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) homologous recombination repair deficiency, lymphocyte-predominant tumours, and TNBC type 4 molecular subtypes. Clinical trials that address the interaction between these biomarkers and treatment approaches are a priority, to identify subgroups benefiting from additional therapy. SAGE Publications 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6826917/ /pubmed/31700549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919882581 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | TNBC in 2019: Promising Signals for the Treatment of a Formidable Disease Fitzpatrick, Amanda Tutt, Andrew Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer |
title | Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer |
title_full | Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer |
title_short | Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer |
title_sort | controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer |
topic | TNBC in 2019: Promising Signals for the Treatment of a Formidable Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31700549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919882581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitzpatrickamanda controversialissuesintheneoadjuvanttreatmentoftriplenegativebreastcancer AT tuttandrew controversialissuesintheneoadjuvanttreatmentoftriplenegativebreastcancer |