Cargando…

Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Dispatched citizen responders are increasingly involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation which can lead to severe stress. It is unknown which psychological assessment tools are most appropriate to evaluate psychological distress in this population. The aim of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kragh, Astrid Rolin, Folke, Fredrik, Andelius, Linn, Ries, Emma Slebsager, Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby, Hansen, Carolina Malta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6
_version_ 1783465259200151552
author Kragh, Astrid Rolin
Folke, Fredrik
Andelius, Linn
Ries, Emma Slebsager
Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby
Hansen, Carolina Malta
author_facet Kragh, Astrid Rolin
Folke, Fredrik
Andelius, Linn
Ries, Emma Slebsager
Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby
Hansen, Carolina Malta
author_sort Kragh, Astrid Rolin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dispatched citizen responders are increasingly involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation which can lead to severe stress. It is unknown which psychological assessment tools are most appropriate to evaluate psychological distress in this population. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate existing assessment tools used to measure psychological distress with emphasis on citizen responders who attempted resuscitation. METHODS: A systematic literature search conducted by two reviewers was carried out in March 2018 and revised in July 2018. Four databases were searched: PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, and The Social Sciences Citation Index. A total of 504 studies examining assessment tools to measure psychological distress reactions after acute traumatic events were identified, and 9 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for further analysis. The selected studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. RESULTS: The Impact of Event Scale (IES) and The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) were the preferred assessment tools, and were used on diverse populations exposed to various traumatic events. One study included lay rescuers performing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and this study used the IES. The IES and the IES-R also have proven a high validity in various other populations. The Clinical administered PTSD scale (CAPS) was applied in two studies. Though the CAPS is comparable to both the IES-R and the IES, the CAPS assess PTSD symptoms in general and not in relation to a specific experienced event, which makes the scale less suitable when measuring stress due to a specific resuscitation attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The IES and the IES-R seem to be solid measures for psychological distress among people experiencing an acute psychological traumatic event. However, only one study has assessed psychological distress among citizen responders in OHCA for which the IES-R scale was used, and therefore, further research on this topic is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6827169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68271692019-11-07 Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review Kragh, Astrid Rolin Folke, Fredrik Andelius, Linn Ries, Emma Slebsager Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby Hansen, Carolina Malta BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Dispatched citizen responders are increasingly involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation which can lead to severe stress. It is unknown which psychological assessment tools are most appropriate to evaluate psychological distress in this population. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate existing assessment tools used to measure psychological distress with emphasis on citizen responders who attempted resuscitation. METHODS: A systematic literature search conducted by two reviewers was carried out in March 2018 and revised in July 2018. Four databases were searched: PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, and The Social Sciences Citation Index. A total of 504 studies examining assessment tools to measure psychological distress reactions after acute traumatic events were identified, and 9 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for further analysis. The selected studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. RESULTS: The Impact of Event Scale (IES) and The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) were the preferred assessment tools, and were used on diverse populations exposed to various traumatic events. One study included lay rescuers performing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and this study used the IES. The IES and the IES-R also have proven a high validity in various other populations. The Clinical administered PTSD scale (CAPS) was applied in two studies. Though the CAPS is comparable to both the IES-R and the IES, the CAPS assess PTSD symptoms in general and not in relation to a specific experienced event, which makes the scale less suitable when measuring stress due to a specific resuscitation attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The IES and the IES-R seem to be solid measures for psychological distress among people experiencing an acute psychological traumatic event. However, only one study has assessed psychological distress among citizen responders in OHCA for which the IES-R scale was used, and therefore, further research on this topic is warranted. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6827169/ /pubmed/31684872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kragh, Astrid Rolin
Folke, Fredrik
Andelius, Linn
Ries, Emma Slebsager
Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby
Hansen, Carolina Malta
Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
title Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
title_full Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
title_fullStr Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
title_short Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
title_sort evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kraghastridrolin evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview
AT folkefredrik evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview
AT andeliuslinn evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview
AT riesemmaslebsager evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview
AT rasmussenrasmusvedby evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview
AT hansencarolinamalta evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview