Cargando…
Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Dispatched citizen responders are increasingly involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation which can lead to severe stress. It is unknown which psychological assessment tools are most appropriate to evaluate psychological distress in this population. The aim of this s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6 |
_version_ | 1783465259200151552 |
---|---|
author | Kragh, Astrid Rolin Folke, Fredrik Andelius, Linn Ries, Emma Slebsager Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby Hansen, Carolina Malta |
author_facet | Kragh, Astrid Rolin Folke, Fredrik Andelius, Linn Ries, Emma Slebsager Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby Hansen, Carolina Malta |
author_sort | Kragh, Astrid Rolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dispatched citizen responders are increasingly involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation which can lead to severe stress. It is unknown which psychological assessment tools are most appropriate to evaluate psychological distress in this population. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate existing assessment tools used to measure psychological distress with emphasis on citizen responders who attempted resuscitation. METHODS: A systematic literature search conducted by two reviewers was carried out in March 2018 and revised in July 2018. Four databases were searched: PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, and The Social Sciences Citation Index. A total of 504 studies examining assessment tools to measure psychological distress reactions after acute traumatic events were identified, and 9 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for further analysis. The selected studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. RESULTS: The Impact of Event Scale (IES) and The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) were the preferred assessment tools, and were used on diverse populations exposed to various traumatic events. One study included lay rescuers performing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and this study used the IES. The IES and the IES-R also have proven a high validity in various other populations. The Clinical administered PTSD scale (CAPS) was applied in two studies. Though the CAPS is comparable to both the IES-R and the IES, the CAPS assess PTSD symptoms in general and not in relation to a specific experienced event, which makes the scale less suitable when measuring stress due to a specific resuscitation attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The IES and the IES-R seem to be solid measures for psychological distress among people experiencing an acute psychological traumatic event. However, only one study has assessed psychological distress among citizen responders in OHCA for which the IES-R scale was used, and therefore, further research on this topic is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6827169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68271692019-11-07 Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review Kragh, Astrid Rolin Folke, Fredrik Andelius, Linn Ries, Emma Slebsager Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby Hansen, Carolina Malta BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Dispatched citizen responders are increasingly involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation which can lead to severe stress. It is unknown which psychological assessment tools are most appropriate to evaluate psychological distress in this population. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate existing assessment tools used to measure psychological distress with emphasis on citizen responders who attempted resuscitation. METHODS: A systematic literature search conducted by two reviewers was carried out in March 2018 and revised in July 2018. Four databases were searched: PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, and The Social Sciences Citation Index. A total of 504 studies examining assessment tools to measure psychological distress reactions after acute traumatic events were identified, and 9 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for further analysis. The selected studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. RESULTS: The Impact of Event Scale (IES) and The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) were the preferred assessment tools, and were used on diverse populations exposed to various traumatic events. One study included lay rescuers performing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and this study used the IES. The IES and the IES-R also have proven a high validity in various other populations. The Clinical administered PTSD scale (CAPS) was applied in two studies. Though the CAPS is comparable to both the IES-R and the IES, the CAPS assess PTSD symptoms in general and not in relation to a specific experienced event, which makes the scale less suitable when measuring stress due to a specific resuscitation attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The IES and the IES-R seem to be solid measures for psychological distress among people experiencing an acute psychological traumatic event. However, only one study has assessed psychological distress among citizen responders in OHCA for which the IES-R scale was used, and therefore, further research on this topic is warranted. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6827169/ /pubmed/31684872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kragh, Astrid Rolin Folke, Fredrik Andelius, Linn Ries, Emma Slebsager Rasmussen, Rasmus Vedby Hansen, Carolina Malta Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review |
title | Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review |
title_full | Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review |
title_short | Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review |
title_sort | evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders– a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kraghastridrolin evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview AT folkefredrik evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview AT andeliuslinn evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview AT riesemmaslebsager evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview AT rasmussenrasmusvedby evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview AT hansencarolinamalta evaluationoftoolstoassesspsychologicaldistresshowtomeasurepsychologicalstressreactionsincitizenrespondersasystematicreview |