Cargando…

Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department

BACKGROUND: To test if the 5-item compassion measure (a tool previously validated in the outpatient setting to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion) is a valid and reliable tool to quantify a distinct construct (i.e. clinical compassion) among patients evaluated in the emergency depart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabapathi, Praveen, Roberts, Michael B., Fuller, Brian M., Puskarich, Michael A., Jones, Christopher W., Kilgannon, J. Hope, Braz, Valerie, Creel-Bulos, Christina, Scott, Nathaniel, Tester, Kristina L., Mazzarelli, Anthony, Trzeciak, Stephen, Roberts, Brian W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0279-5
_version_ 1783465267192397824
author Sabapathi, Praveen
Roberts, Michael B.
Fuller, Brian M.
Puskarich, Michael A.
Jones, Christopher W.
Kilgannon, J. Hope
Braz, Valerie
Creel-Bulos, Christina
Scott, Nathaniel
Tester, Kristina L.
Mazzarelli, Anthony
Trzeciak, Stephen
Roberts, Brian W.
author_facet Sabapathi, Praveen
Roberts, Michael B.
Fuller, Brian M.
Puskarich, Michael A.
Jones, Christopher W.
Kilgannon, J. Hope
Braz, Valerie
Creel-Bulos, Christina
Scott, Nathaniel
Tester, Kristina L.
Mazzarelli, Anthony
Trzeciak, Stephen
Roberts, Brian W.
author_sort Sabapathi, Praveen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To test if the 5-item compassion measure (a tool previously validated in the outpatient setting to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion) is a valid and reliable tool to quantify a distinct construct (i.e. clinical compassion) among patients evaluated in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in three academic emergency departments in the U.S. between November 2018 and April 2019. We enrolled adult patients who were evaluated in the EDs of the participating institutions and administered the 5-item compassion measure after completion of care in the ED. Validity testing was performed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha was used to test reliability. Convergent validity with patient assessment of overall satisfaction questions was tested using Spearman correlation coefficients and we tested if the 5-item compassion measure assessed a construct distinct from overall patient satisfaction using confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 866 patient responses. Confirmatory factor analysis found all five items loaded well on a single construct and our model was found to have good fit. Reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93) among the entire cohort. These results remained consistent on sub-analyses stratified by individual institutions. The 5-item compassion measure had moderate correlation with overall patient satisfaction (r = 0.66) and patient recommendation of the ED to friends and family (r = 0.57), but reflected a patient experience domain (i.e. compassionate care) distinctly different from patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-item compassion measure is a valid and reliable tool to measure patient assessment of clinical compassion in the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6827199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68271992019-11-07 Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department Sabapathi, Praveen Roberts, Michael B. Fuller, Brian M. Puskarich, Michael A. Jones, Christopher W. Kilgannon, J. Hope Braz, Valerie Creel-Bulos, Christina Scott, Nathaniel Tester, Kristina L. Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen Roberts, Brian W. BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: To test if the 5-item compassion measure (a tool previously validated in the outpatient setting to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion) is a valid and reliable tool to quantify a distinct construct (i.e. clinical compassion) among patients evaluated in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in three academic emergency departments in the U.S. between November 2018 and April 2019. We enrolled adult patients who were evaluated in the EDs of the participating institutions and administered the 5-item compassion measure after completion of care in the ED. Validity testing was performed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha was used to test reliability. Convergent validity with patient assessment of overall satisfaction questions was tested using Spearman correlation coefficients and we tested if the 5-item compassion measure assessed a construct distinct from overall patient satisfaction using confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 866 patient responses. Confirmatory factor analysis found all five items loaded well on a single construct and our model was found to have good fit. Reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93) among the entire cohort. These results remained consistent on sub-analyses stratified by individual institutions. The 5-item compassion measure had moderate correlation with overall patient satisfaction (r = 0.66) and patient recommendation of the ED to friends and family (r = 0.57), but reflected a patient experience domain (i.e. compassionate care) distinctly different from patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-item compassion measure is a valid and reliable tool to measure patient assessment of clinical compassion in the ED. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6827199/ /pubmed/31684885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0279-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sabapathi, Praveen
Roberts, Michael B.
Fuller, Brian M.
Puskarich, Michael A.
Jones, Christopher W.
Kilgannon, J. Hope
Braz, Valerie
Creel-Bulos, Christina
Scott, Nathaniel
Tester, Kristina L.
Mazzarelli, Anthony
Trzeciak, Stephen
Roberts, Brian W.
Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
title Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
title_full Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
title_fullStr Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
title_short Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
title_sort validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0279-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sabapathipraveen validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT robertsmichaelb validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT fullerbrianm validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT puskarichmichaela validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT joneschristopherw validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT kilgannonjhope validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT brazvalerie validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT creelbuloschristina validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT scottnathaniel validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT testerkristinal validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT mazzarellianthony validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT trzeciakstephen validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment
AT robertsbrianw validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment