Cargando…
Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department
BACKGROUND: To test if the 5-item compassion measure (a tool previously validated in the outpatient setting to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion) is a valid and reliable tool to quantify a distinct construct (i.e. clinical compassion) among patients evaluated in the emergency depart...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0279-5 |
_version_ | 1783465267192397824 |
---|---|
author | Sabapathi, Praveen Roberts, Michael B. Fuller, Brian M. Puskarich, Michael A. Jones, Christopher W. Kilgannon, J. Hope Braz, Valerie Creel-Bulos, Christina Scott, Nathaniel Tester, Kristina L. Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen Roberts, Brian W. |
author_facet | Sabapathi, Praveen Roberts, Michael B. Fuller, Brian M. Puskarich, Michael A. Jones, Christopher W. Kilgannon, J. Hope Braz, Valerie Creel-Bulos, Christina Scott, Nathaniel Tester, Kristina L. Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen Roberts, Brian W. |
author_sort | Sabapathi, Praveen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To test if the 5-item compassion measure (a tool previously validated in the outpatient setting to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion) is a valid and reliable tool to quantify a distinct construct (i.e. clinical compassion) among patients evaluated in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in three academic emergency departments in the U.S. between November 2018 and April 2019. We enrolled adult patients who were evaluated in the EDs of the participating institutions and administered the 5-item compassion measure after completion of care in the ED. Validity testing was performed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha was used to test reliability. Convergent validity with patient assessment of overall satisfaction questions was tested using Spearman correlation coefficients and we tested if the 5-item compassion measure assessed a construct distinct from overall patient satisfaction using confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 866 patient responses. Confirmatory factor analysis found all five items loaded well on a single construct and our model was found to have good fit. Reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93) among the entire cohort. These results remained consistent on sub-analyses stratified by individual institutions. The 5-item compassion measure had moderate correlation with overall patient satisfaction (r = 0.66) and patient recommendation of the ED to friends and family (r = 0.57), but reflected a patient experience domain (i.e. compassionate care) distinctly different from patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-item compassion measure is a valid and reliable tool to measure patient assessment of clinical compassion in the ED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6827199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68271992019-11-07 Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department Sabapathi, Praveen Roberts, Michael B. Fuller, Brian M. Puskarich, Michael A. Jones, Christopher W. Kilgannon, J. Hope Braz, Valerie Creel-Bulos, Christina Scott, Nathaniel Tester, Kristina L. Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen Roberts, Brian W. BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: To test if the 5-item compassion measure (a tool previously validated in the outpatient setting to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion) is a valid and reliable tool to quantify a distinct construct (i.e. clinical compassion) among patients evaluated in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in three academic emergency departments in the U.S. between November 2018 and April 2019. We enrolled adult patients who were evaluated in the EDs of the participating institutions and administered the 5-item compassion measure after completion of care in the ED. Validity testing was performed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha was used to test reliability. Convergent validity with patient assessment of overall satisfaction questions was tested using Spearman correlation coefficients and we tested if the 5-item compassion measure assessed a construct distinct from overall patient satisfaction using confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 866 patient responses. Confirmatory factor analysis found all five items loaded well on a single construct and our model was found to have good fit. Reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93) among the entire cohort. These results remained consistent on sub-analyses stratified by individual institutions. The 5-item compassion measure had moderate correlation with overall patient satisfaction (r = 0.66) and patient recommendation of the ED to friends and family (r = 0.57), but reflected a patient experience domain (i.e. compassionate care) distinctly different from patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-item compassion measure is a valid and reliable tool to measure patient assessment of clinical compassion in the ED. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6827199/ /pubmed/31684885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0279-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sabapathi, Praveen Roberts, Michael B. Fuller, Brian M. Puskarich, Michael A. Jones, Christopher W. Kilgannon, J. Hope Braz, Valerie Creel-Bulos, Christina Scott, Nathaniel Tester, Kristina L. Mazzarelli, Anthony Trzeciak, Stephen Roberts, Brian W. Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department |
title | Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department |
title_full | Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department |
title_fullStr | Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department |
title_short | Validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department |
title_sort | validation of a 5-item tool to measure patient assessment of clinician compassion in the emergency department |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0279-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabapathipraveen validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT robertsmichaelb validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT fullerbrianm validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT puskarichmichaela validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT joneschristopherw validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT kilgannonjhope validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT brazvalerie validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT creelbuloschristina validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT scottnathaniel validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT testerkristinal validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT mazzarellianthony validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT trzeciakstephen validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment AT robertsbrianw validationofa5itemtooltomeasurepatientassessmentofcliniciancompassionintheemergencydepartment |