Cargando…

Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources

BACKGROUND: The American Diabetes Association recommends a family‐centered approach that addresses each family's specific type 1 diabetes self‐management barriers. OBJECTIVE: To assess an intervention that tailored delivery of self‐management resources to families' specific self‐management...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiallo‐Scharer, Rosanna, Palta, Mari, Chewning, Betty A., Rajamanickam, Victoria, Wysocki, Tim, Wetterneck, Tosha B., Cox, Elizabeth D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons A/S 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31355957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12899
_version_ 1783465288759508992
author Fiallo‐Scharer, Rosanna
Palta, Mari
Chewning, Betty A.
Rajamanickam, Victoria
Wysocki, Tim
Wetterneck, Tosha B.
Cox, Elizabeth D.
author_facet Fiallo‐Scharer, Rosanna
Palta, Mari
Chewning, Betty A.
Rajamanickam, Victoria
Wysocki, Tim
Wetterneck, Tosha B.
Cox, Elizabeth D.
author_sort Fiallo‐Scharer, Rosanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Diabetes Association recommends a family‐centered approach that addresses each family's specific type 1 diabetes self‐management barriers. OBJECTIVE: To assess an intervention that tailored delivery of self‐management resources to families' specific self‐management barriers. SUBJECTS: At two sites, 214 children 8‐16 years old with type 1 diabetes and their parent(s) were randomized to receive tailored self‐management resources (intervention, n = 106) or usual care (n = 108). METHODS: Our intervention (1) identified families' self‐management barriers with a validated survey, (2) tailored self‐management resources to identified barriers, and (3) delivered the resources as four group sessions coordinated with diabetes visits. Mixed effects models with repeated measures were fit to A1c as well as parent and child QOL during the intervention and 1 year thereafter. RESULTS: Participants were 44% youth (8‐12 years) and 56% teens (13‐16 years). No intervention effect on A1c or QOL was shown, combining data from sites and age groups. Analyzing results by site and age group, post‐intervention A1c for teens at one site declined by 0.06 more per month for intervention teens compared to usual care (P < 0.05). In this group, post‐intervention A1c declined significantly when baseline A1c was >8.5 (−0.08, P < 0.05), with an even larger decline when baseline A1c was >10 (−0.19, P < 0.05). In addition, for these teens, the significant improvements in A1c resulted from addressing barriers related to motivation to self‐manage. Also at this site, mean QOL increased by 0.61 points per month more during the intervention for parents of intervention youth than for usual care youth (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tailored self‐management resources may improve outcomes among specific populations, suggesting the need to consider families' self‐management barriers and patient characteristics before implementing self‐management resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6827338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons A/S
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68273382019-11-04 Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources Fiallo‐Scharer, Rosanna Palta, Mari Chewning, Betty A. Rajamanickam, Victoria Wysocki, Tim Wetterneck, Tosha B. Cox, Elizabeth D. Pediatr Diabetes Psychological Aspects of Diabetes BACKGROUND: The American Diabetes Association recommends a family‐centered approach that addresses each family's specific type 1 diabetes self‐management barriers. OBJECTIVE: To assess an intervention that tailored delivery of self‐management resources to families' specific self‐management barriers. SUBJECTS: At two sites, 214 children 8‐16 years old with type 1 diabetes and their parent(s) were randomized to receive tailored self‐management resources (intervention, n = 106) or usual care (n = 108). METHODS: Our intervention (1) identified families' self‐management barriers with a validated survey, (2) tailored self‐management resources to identified barriers, and (3) delivered the resources as four group sessions coordinated with diabetes visits. Mixed effects models with repeated measures were fit to A1c as well as parent and child QOL during the intervention and 1 year thereafter. RESULTS: Participants were 44% youth (8‐12 years) and 56% teens (13‐16 years). No intervention effect on A1c or QOL was shown, combining data from sites and age groups. Analyzing results by site and age group, post‐intervention A1c for teens at one site declined by 0.06 more per month for intervention teens compared to usual care (P < 0.05). In this group, post‐intervention A1c declined significantly when baseline A1c was >8.5 (−0.08, P < 0.05), with an even larger decline when baseline A1c was >10 (−0.19, P < 0.05). In addition, for these teens, the significant improvements in A1c resulted from addressing barriers related to motivation to self‐manage. Also at this site, mean QOL increased by 0.61 points per month more during the intervention for parents of intervention youth than for usual care youth (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tailored self‐management resources may improve outcomes among specific populations, suggesting the need to consider families' self‐management barriers and patient characteristics before implementing self‐management resources. John Wiley & Sons A/S 2019-08-08 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6827338/ /pubmed/31355957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12899 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Pediatric Diabetes published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Psychological Aspects of Diabetes
Fiallo‐Scharer, Rosanna
Palta, Mari
Chewning, Betty A.
Rajamanickam, Victoria
Wysocki, Tim
Wetterneck, Tosha B.
Cox, Elizabeth D.
Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources
title Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources
title_full Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources
title_fullStr Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources
title_full_unstemmed Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources
title_short Impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources
title_sort impact of family‐centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self‐management resources
topic Psychological Aspects of Diabetes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31355957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12899
work_keys_str_mv AT fialloscharerrosanna impactoffamilycenteredtailoringofpediatricdiabetesselfmanagementresources
AT paltamari impactoffamilycenteredtailoringofpediatricdiabetesselfmanagementresources
AT chewningbettya impactoffamilycenteredtailoringofpediatricdiabetesselfmanagementresources
AT rajamanickamvictoria impactoffamilycenteredtailoringofpediatricdiabetesselfmanagementresources
AT wysockitim impactoffamilycenteredtailoringofpediatricdiabetesselfmanagementresources
AT wetternecktoshab impactoffamilycenteredtailoringofpediatricdiabetesselfmanagementresources
AT coxelizabethd impactoffamilycenteredtailoringofpediatricdiabetesselfmanagementresources