Cargando…
A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
BACKGROUND: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquatic sport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695968 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006 |
_version_ | 1783465310029873152 |
---|---|
author | Schram, Ben Furness, James Kemp-Smith, Kevin Sharp, Jason Cristini, Matthew Harvie, Daniel Keady, Emma Ghobrial, Maichel Tussler, Joshoa Hing, Wayne Nessler, Jeff Becker, Matthew |
author_facet | Schram, Ben Furness, James Kemp-Smith, Kevin Sharp, Jason Cristini, Matthew Harvie, Daniel Keady, Emma Ghobrial, Maichel Tussler, Joshoa Hing, Wayne Nessler, Jeff Becker, Matthew |
author_sort | Schram, Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquatic sport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise. RESULTS: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9° ± 24.9° vs 56.6° ± 17.3°, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0° ± 18.5° vs 66.4° ± 11.8°, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9° ± 16.3° vs 35.2° ± 28.5°, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0° ± 9.2° minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8° ± 13.5°, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6827442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68274422019-11-06 A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study Schram, Ben Furness, James Kemp-Smith, Kevin Sharp, Jason Cristini, Matthew Harvie, Daniel Keady, Emma Ghobrial, Maichel Tussler, Joshoa Hing, Wayne Nessler, Jeff Becker, Matthew PeerJ Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquatic sport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise. RESULTS: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9° ± 24.9° vs 56.6° ± 17.3°, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0° ± 18.5° vs 66.4° ± 11.8°, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9° ± 16.3° vs 35.2° ± 28.5°, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0° ± 9.2° minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8° ± 13.5°, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP. PeerJ Inc. 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6827442/ /pubmed/31695968 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006 Text en © 2019 Schram et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Schram, Ben Furness, James Kemp-Smith, Kevin Sharp, Jason Cristini, Matthew Harvie, Daniel Keady, Emma Ghobrial, Maichel Tussler, Joshoa Hing, Wayne Nessler, Jeff Becker, Matthew A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study |
title | A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study |
title_full | A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study |
title_short | A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study |
title_sort | biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695968 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schramben abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT furnessjames abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT kempsmithkevin abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT sharpjason abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT cristinimatthew abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT harviedaniel abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT keadyemma abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT ghobrialmaichel abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT tusslerjoshoa abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT hingwayne abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT nesslerjeff abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT beckermatthew abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT schramben biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT furnessjames biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT kempsmithkevin biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT sharpjason biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT cristinimatthew biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT harviedaniel biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT keadyemma biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT ghobrialmaichel biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT tusslerjoshoa biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT hingwayne biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT nesslerjeff biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy AT beckermatthew biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy |