Cargando…

A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquatic sport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schram, Ben, Furness, James, Kemp-Smith, Kevin, Sharp, Jason, Cristini, Matthew, Harvie, Daniel, Keady, Emma, Ghobrial, Maichel, Tussler, Joshoa, Hing, Wayne, Nessler, Jeff, Becker, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695968
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006
_version_ 1783465310029873152
author Schram, Ben
Furness, James
Kemp-Smith, Kevin
Sharp, Jason
Cristini, Matthew
Harvie, Daniel
Keady, Emma
Ghobrial, Maichel
Tussler, Joshoa
Hing, Wayne
Nessler, Jeff
Becker, Matthew
author_facet Schram, Ben
Furness, James
Kemp-Smith, Kevin
Sharp, Jason
Cristini, Matthew
Harvie, Daniel
Keady, Emma
Ghobrial, Maichel
Tussler, Joshoa
Hing, Wayne
Nessler, Jeff
Becker, Matthew
author_sort Schram, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquatic sport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise. RESULTS: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9° ± 24.9° vs 56.6° ± 17.3°, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0° ± 18.5° vs 66.4° ± 11.8°, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9° ± 16.3° vs 35.2° ± 28.5°, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0° ± 9.2° minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8° ± 13.5°, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6827442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68274422019-11-06 A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study Schram, Ben Furness, James Kemp-Smith, Kevin Sharp, Jason Cristini, Matthew Harvie, Daniel Keady, Emma Ghobrial, Maichel Tussler, Joshoa Hing, Wayne Nessler, Jeff Becker, Matthew PeerJ Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquatic sport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise. RESULTS: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9° ± 24.9° vs 56.6° ± 17.3°, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0° ± 18.5° vs 66.4° ± 11.8°, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9° ± 16.3° vs 35.2° ± 28.5°, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0° ± 9.2° minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8° ± 13.5°, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP. PeerJ Inc. 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6827442/ /pubmed/31695968 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006 Text en © 2019 Schram et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Schram, Ben
Furness, James
Kemp-Smith, Kevin
Sharp, Jason
Cristini, Matthew
Harvie, Daniel
Keady, Emma
Ghobrial, Maichel
Tussler, Joshoa
Hing, Wayne
Nessler, Jeff
Becker, Matthew
A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
title A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
title_full A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
title_fullStr A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
title_short A biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
title_sort biomechanical analysis of the stand-up paddle board stroke: a comparative study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6827442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695968
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006
work_keys_str_mv AT schramben abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT furnessjames abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT kempsmithkevin abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT sharpjason abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT cristinimatthew abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT harviedaniel abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT keadyemma abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT ghobrialmaichel abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT tusslerjoshoa abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT hingwayne abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT nesslerjeff abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT beckermatthew abiomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT schramben biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT furnessjames biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT kempsmithkevin biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT sharpjason biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT cristinimatthew biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT harviedaniel biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT keadyemma biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT ghobrialmaichel biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT tusslerjoshoa biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT hingwayne biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT nesslerjeff biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy
AT beckermatthew biomechanicalanalysisofthestanduppaddleboardstrokeacomparativestudy