Cargando…
Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1
Introduction Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a long latency auditory evoked potential, represented by a negative wave, generated after the potential N1 and visualized in a resulting wave. Objective To identify the time of occurrence of MMN after N1, elicited with verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Methods...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6828569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696701 |
_version_ | 1783465379203383296 |
---|---|
author | Brückmann, Mirtes Garcia, Michele Vargas |
author_facet | Brückmann, Mirtes Garcia, Michele Vargas |
author_sort | Brückmann, Mirtes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a long latency auditory evoked potential, represented by a negative wave, generated after the potential N1 and visualized in a resulting wave. Objective To identify the time of occurrence of MMN after N1, elicited with verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Methods Ninety individuals aged between 18 and 56 years old participated in the study, 39 of whom were male and 51 female, with normal auditory thresholds, at least 8 years of schooling, and who did not present auditory processing complaints. All of them underwent audiologic anamnesis, visual inspection of external auditory meatus, pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, acoustic immittance measures and the dichotic sentence identification test as a screening for alterations in auditory processing, a requirement to participate in the sample. The MMN was applied with two different stimuli, with these being da/ta (verbal) and 750 Hz and 1,000 Hz (nonverbal). Results There was a statistically significant difference between the latency values of the N1 potential and the MMN with the two stimuli, as well as between the MMN with verbal and nonverbal stimuli, and the latency of the MMN elicited with da/ta being greater than that elicited with 750 Hz and 1,000 Hz, which facilitated its visualization. Conclusion The time of occurrence of MMN after the N1 elicited with verbal stimuli was 100.4 ms and with nonverbal stimuli 85.5 ms. Thus, the marking of the MMN with verbal stimuli proved to be more distant from N1 compared with the nonverbal stimuli. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6828569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68285692020-04-01 Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1 Brückmann, Mirtes Garcia, Michele Vargas Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a long latency auditory evoked potential, represented by a negative wave, generated after the potential N1 and visualized in a resulting wave. Objective To identify the time of occurrence of MMN after N1, elicited with verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Methods Ninety individuals aged between 18 and 56 years old participated in the study, 39 of whom were male and 51 female, with normal auditory thresholds, at least 8 years of schooling, and who did not present auditory processing complaints. All of them underwent audiologic anamnesis, visual inspection of external auditory meatus, pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, acoustic immittance measures and the dichotic sentence identification test as a screening for alterations in auditory processing, a requirement to participate in the sample. The MMN was applied with two different stimuli, with these being da/ta (verbal) and 750 Hz and 1,000 Hz (nonverbal). Results There was a statistically significant difference between the latency values of the N1 potential and the MMN with the two stimuli, as well as between the MMN with verbal and nonverbal stimuli, and the latency of the MMN elicited with da/ta being greater than that elicited with 750 Hz and 1,000 Hz, which facilitated its visualization. Conclusion The time of occurrence of MMN after the N1 elicited with verbal stimuli was 100.4 ms and with nonverbal stimuli 85.5 ms. Thus, the marking of the MMN with verbal stimuli proved to be more distant from N1 compared with the nonverbal stimuli. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2020-04 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6828569/ /pubmed/32256835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696701 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brückmann, Mirtes Garcia, Michele Vargas Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1 |
title | Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1 |
title_full | Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1 |
title_fullStr | Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1 |
title_full_unstemmed | Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1 |
title_short | Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1 |
title_sort | mismatch negativity elicited by verbal and nonverbal stimuli: comparison with potential n1 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6828569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bruckmannmirtes mismatchnegativityelicitedbyverbalandnonverbalstimulicomparisonwithpotentialn1 AT garciamichelevargas mismatchnegativityelicitedbyverbalandnonverbalstimulicomparisonwithpotentialn1 |