Cargando…

Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION: Several therapeutic options are available to manage anogenital warts (AGWs). However, no hierarchy of treatments is provided in the latest European and American recommendations. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of local treatments for the management of AGWs. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertolotti, Antoine, Milpied, Brigitte, Fouéré, Sébastien, Dupin, Nicolas, Cabié, André, Derancourt, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6828858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-019-00328-z
_version_ 1783465441407008768
author Bertolotti, Antoine
Milpied, Brigitte
Fouéré, Sébastien
Dupin, Nicolas
Cabié, André
Derancourt, Christian
author_facet Bertolotti, Antoine
Milpied, Brigitte
Fouéré, Sébastien
Dupin, Nicolas
Cabié, André
Derancourt, Christian
author_sort Bertolotti, Antoine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several therapeutic options are available to manage anogenital warts (AGWs). However, no hierarchy of treatments is provided in the latest European and American recommendations. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of local treatments for the management of AGWs. METHODS: A search was conducted through 12 databases from inception to August 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which at least one parallel treatment group composed of immunocompetent adults with AGWs received at least one provider-administered or patient-administered treatment were included. Risk of bias assessment and meta-analyses of aggregated study data were performed on the basis of the Cochrane Handbook, and quality of evidence evaluation followed the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Primary endpoints were complete clearance and recurrence at 3 months. RESULTS: Seventy RCTs (9931 patients) were included. All but four RCTs had a high risk of bias. CO(2) laser was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy [risk ratio (RR) 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61–2.62], with fewer recurrences at 3 months (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09–0.89). Electrosurgery was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy. No differences in efficacy or side effects were found between cryotherapy and imiquimod or trichloroacetic acid. Podophyllotoxin gel was slightly more efficacious than podophyllotoxin cream. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) was slightly more efficacious and caused less erosion than CO(2) laser (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.11–1.70). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of included RCTs had a low level of evidence, thereby preventing the establishment of a hierarchy of treatments. Nevertheless, our results provide an overview of the main AGW treatments available for general practitioners and specialists. While provider-administered treatments are superior, patient-administered treatments (e.g., imiquimod, podophyllotoxin) are useful solutions for compliant patients. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42015025827. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-019-00328-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6828858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68288582019-11-18 Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials Bertolotti, Antoine Milpied, Brigitte Fouéré, Sébastien Dupin, Nicolas Cabié, André Derancourt, Christian Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Several therapeutic options are available to manage anogenital warts (AGWs). However, no hierarchy of treatments is provided in the latest European and American recommendations. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of local treatments for the management of AGWs. METHODS: A search was conducted through 12 databases from inception to August 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which at least one parallel treatment group composed of immunocompetent adults with AGWs received at least one provider-administered or patient-administered treatment were included. Risk of bias assessment and meta-analyses of aggregated study data were performed on the basis of the Cochrane Handbook, and quality of evidence evaluation followed the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Primary endpoints were complete clearance and recurrence at 3 months. RESULTS: Seventy RCTs (9931 patients) were included. All but four RCTs had a high risk of bias. CO(2) laser was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy [risk ratio (RR) 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61–2.62], with fewer recurrences at 3 months (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09–0.89). Electrosurgery was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy. No differences in efficacy or side effects were found between cryotherapy and imiquimod or trichloroacetic acid. Podophyllotoxin gel was slightly more efficacious than podophyllotoxin cream. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) was slightly more efficacious and caused less erosion than CO(2) laser (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.11–1.70). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of included RCTs had a low level of evidence, thereby preventing the establishment of a hierarchy of treatments. Nevertheless, our results provide an overview of the main AGW treatments available for general practitioners and specialists. While provider-administered treatments are superior, patient-administered treatments (e.g., imiquimod, podophyllotoxin) are useful solutions for compliant patients. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42015025827. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-019-00328-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6828858/ /pubmed/31606873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-019-00328-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bertolotti, Antoine
Milpied, Brigitte
Fouéré, Sébastien
Dupin, Nicolas
Cabié, André
Derancourt, Christian
Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort local management of anogenital warts in non-immunocompromised adults: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6828858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-019-00328-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bertolottiantoine localmanagementofanogenitalwartsinnonimmunocompromisedadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT milpiedbrigitte localmanagementofanogenitalwartsinnonimmunocompromisedadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT foueresebastien localmanagementofanogenitalwartsinnonimmunocompromisedadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dupinnicolas localmanagementofanogenitalwartsinnonimmunocompromisedadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cabieandre localmanagementofanogenitalwartsinnonimmunocompromisedadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT derancourtchristian localmanagementofanogenitalwartsinnonimmunocompromisedadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesofrandomizedcontrolledtrials