Cargando…

Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks

Spontaneous neural activities are endowed with specific patterning characterized by synchronizations within functionally relevant distant regions that are termed as resting-state networks (RSNs). Although the mechanisms that organize the large-scale neural systems are still largely unknown, recent s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amemiya, Shiori, Takao, Hidemasa, Abe, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736721
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00065
_version_ 1783465479766016000
author Amemiya, Shiori
Takao, Hidemasa
Abe, Osamu
author_facet Amemiya, Shiori
Takao, Hidemasa
Abe, Osamu
author_sort Amemiya, Shiori
collection PubMed
description Spontaneous neural activities are endowed with specific patterning characterized by synchronizations within functionally relevant distant regions that are termed as resting-state networks (RSNs). Although the mechanisms that organize the large-scale neural systems are still largely unknown, recent studies have proposed a hypothesis that network-specific coactivations indeed emerge as the result of globally propagating neural activities with specific paths of transmission. However, the extent to which such a centralized global regulation, rather than network-specific control, contributes to the RSN synchronization remains unknown. In the present study, we investigated the contribution from each mechanism by directly identifying the global as well as local component of resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data provided by human connectome project, using temporal independent component analysis (ICA). Based on the spatial distribution pattern, each ICA component was classified as global or local. Time lag mapping of each IC revealed several paths of global or semi-global propagations that are partially overlapping yet spatially distinct to each other. Consistent with previous studies, the time lag of global oscillation, although being less spatially homogenous than what was assumed to be, contributed to the RSN synchronization. However, an equivalent contribution was also shown on the part of the more locally confined activities that are independent to each other. While allowing the view that network-specific coactivation occurs as part of the sequences of global neural activities, these results further confirm an equally important role of the network-specific regulation for its coactivation, regardless of whether vascular artifacts contaminate the global component in fMRI measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6829116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68291162019-11-15 Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks Amemiya, Shiori Takao, Hidemasa Abe, Osamu Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Spontaneous neural activities are endowed with specific patterning characterized by synchronizations within functionally relevant distant regions that are termed as resting-state networks (RSNs). Although the mechanisms that organize the large-scale neural systems are still largely unknown, recent studies have proposed a hypothesis that network-specific coactivations indeed emerge as the result of globally propagating neural activities with specific paths of transmission. However, the extent to which such a centralized global regulation, rather than network-specific control, contributes to the RSN synchronization remains unknown. In the present study, we investigated the contribution from each mechanism by directly identifying the global as well as local component of resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data provided by human connectome project, using temporal independent component analysis (ICA). Based on the spatial distribution pattern, each ICA component was classified as global or local. Time lag mapping of each IC revealed several paths of global or semi-global propagations that are partially overlapping yet spatially distinct to each other. Consistent with previous studies, the time lag of global oscillation, although being less spatially homogenous than what was assumed to be, contributed to the RSN synchronization. However, an equivalent contribution was also shown on the part of the more locally confined activities that are independent to each other. While allowing the view that network-specific coactivation occurs as part of the sequences of global neural activities, these results further confirm an equally important role of the network-specific regulation for its coactivation, regardless of whether vascular artifacts contaminate the global component in fMRI measures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6829116/ /pubmed/31736721 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00065 Text en Copyright © 2019 Amemiya, Takao and Abe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Amemiya, Shiori
Takao, Hidemasa
Abe, Osamu
Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks
title Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks
title_full Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks
title_fullStr Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks
title_full_unstemmed Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks
title_short Global vs. Network-Specific Regulations as the Source of Intrinsic Coactivations in Resting-State Networks
title_sort global vs. network-specific regulations as the source of intrinsic coactivations in resting-state networks
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736721
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00065
work_keys_str_mv AT amemiyashiori globalvsnetworkspecificregulationsasthesourceofintrinsiccoactivationsinrestingstatenetworks
AT takaohidemasa globalvsnetworkspecificregulationsasthesourceofintrinsiccoactivationsinrestingstatenetworks
AT abeosamu globalvsnetworkspecificregulationsasthesourceofintrinsiccoactivationsinrestingstatenetworks