Cargando…

Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles

This study investigated the corticospinal excitability of reciprocal muscles during tasks involving sensory difference between proprioceptive and visual inputs. Participants were instructed to relax their muscles and to observe a screen during vibratory stimulation. A video screen was placed on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Takako, Suzuki, Makoto, Kanemura, Naohiko, Hamaguchi, Toyohiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00063
_version_ 1783465480013479936
author Suzuki, Takako
Suzuki, Makoto
Kanemura, Naohiko
Hamaguchi, Toyohiro
author_facet Suzuki, Takako
Suzuki, Makoto
Kanemura, Naohiko
Hamaguchi, Toyohiro
author_sort Suzuki, Takako
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the corticospinal excitability of reciprocal muscles during tasks involving sensory difference between proprioceptive and visual inputs. Participants were instructed to relax their muscles and to observe a screen during vibratory stimulation. A video screen was placed on the board covering the right hand and forearm. Participants were randomly tested in four conditions: resting, control, static, and dynamic. The resting condition involved showing a black screen, the control condition, a mosaic patterned static videoclip; the static condition, a static videoclip of wrist flexion 0°; and the dynamic condition, a videoclip that corresponded to each participant’s closely-matched illusory wrist flexion angle and speed by vibration. Vibratory stimulation (frequency 80 Hz and duration 4 s) was applied to the distal tendon of the dominant right extensor carpi radialis (ECR) using a tendon vibrator in the control, static, and dynamic conditions. Four seconds after the vibratory stimulation (end of vibration), the primary motor cortex at the midpoint between the centers of gravity of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and ECR muscles was stimulated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The ECR motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes significantly increased in the control condition compared to the resting condition, whereas the FCR MEP amplitudes did not change between the resting and control conditions. In addition, the ECR MEP amplitudes significantly increased in the static condition compared to the dynamic condition. However, the FCR MEP amplitudes significantly increased in the dynamic condition compared to the static condition. These results imply that the difference between visuo-proprioceptive information had an effect on corticospinal excitability for the muscle. In conclusion, we found that proprioceptive and visual information differentially altered the corticospinal excitability of reciprocal muscles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6829117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68291172019-11-15 Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles Suzuki, Takako Suzuki, Makoto Kanemura, Naohiko Hamaguchi, Toyohiro Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience This study investigated the corticospinal excitability of reciprocal muscles during tasks involving sensory difference between proprioceptive and visual inputs. Participants were instructed to relax their muscles and to observe a screen during vibratory stimulation. A video screen was placed on the board covering the right hand and forearm. Participants were randomly tested in four conditions: resting, control, static, and dynamic. The resting condition involved showing a black screen, the control condition, a mosaic patterned static videoclip; the static condition, a static videoclip of wrist flexion 0°; and the dynamic condition, a videoclip that corresponded to each participant’s closely-matched illusory wrist flexion angle and speed by vibration. Vibratory stimulation (frequency 80 Hz and duration 4 s) was applied to the distal tendon of the dominant right extensor carpi radialis (ECR) using a tendon vibrator in the control, static, and dynamic conditions. Four seconds after the vibratory stimulation (end of vibration), the primary motor cortex at the midpoint between the centers of gravity of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and ECR muscles was stimulated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The ECR motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes significantly increased in the control condition compared to the resting condition, whereas the FCR MEP amplitudes did not change between the resting and control conditions. In addition, the ECR MEP amplitudes significantly increased in the static condition compared to the dynamic condition. However, the FCR MEP amplitudes significantly increased in the dynamic condition compared to the static condition. These results imply that the difference between visuo-proprioceptive information had an effect on corticospinal excitability for the muscle. In conclusion, we found that proprioceptive and visual information differentially altered the corticospinal excitability of reciprocal muscles. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6829117/ /pubmed/31736723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00063 Text en Copyright © 2019 Suzuki, Suzuki, Kanemura and Hamaguchi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Suzuki, Takako
Suzuki, Makoto
Kanemura, Naohiko
Hamaguchi, Toyohiro
Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles
title Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles
title_full Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles
title_fullStr Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles
title_full_unstemmed Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles
title_short Differential Effect of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimulation on Corticospinal Output for Reciprocal Muscles
title_sort differential effect of visual and proprioceptive stimulation on corticospinal output for reciprocal muscles
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31736723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00063
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukitakako differentialeffectofvisualandproprioceptivestimulationoncorticospinaloutputforreciprocalmuscles
AT suzukimakoto differentialeffectofvisualandproprioceptivestimulationoncorticospinaloutputforreciprocalmuscles
AT kanemuranaohiko differentialeffectofvisualandproprioceptivestimulationoncorticospinaloutputforreciprocalmuscles
AT hamaguchitoyohiro differentialeffectofvisualandproprioceptivestimulationoncorticospinaloutputforreciprocalmuscles