Cargando…
Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
Since the autosomal genome is shared between the sexes, sex-specific fitness optima present an evolutionary challenge. While sexually antagonistic selection might favor different alleles within females and males, segregation randomly reassorts alleles at autosomal loci between sexes each generation....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400711 |
_version_ | 1783465488798449664 |
---|---|
author | Kasimatis, Katja R. Ralph, Peter L. Phillips, Patrick C. |
author_facet | Kasimatis, Katja R. Ralph, Peter L. Phillips, Patrick C. |
author_sort | Kasimatis, Katja R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the autosomal genome is shared between the sexes, sex-specific fitness optima present an evolutionary challenge. While sexually antagonistic selection might favor different alleles within females and males, segregation randomly reassorts alleles at autosomal loci between sexes each generation. This process of homogenization during transmission thus prevents between-sex allelic divergence generated by sexually antagonistic selection from accumulating across multiple generations. However, recent empirical studies have reported high male-female F(ST) statistics. Here, we use a population genetic model to evaluate whether these observations could plausibly be produced by sexually antagonistic selection. To do this, we use both a single-locus model with nonrandom mate choice, and individual-based simulations to study the relationship between strength of selection, degree of between-sex divergence, and the associated genetic load. We show that selection must be exceptionally strong to create measurable divergence between the sexes and that the decrease in population fitness due to this process is correspondingly high. Individual-based simulations with selection genome-wide recapitulate these patterns and indicate that small sample sizes and sampling variance can easily generate substantial male-female divergence. We therefore conclude that caution should be taken when interpreting autosomal allelic differentiation between the sexes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68291532019-11-06 Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection Kasimatis, Katja R. Ralph, Peter L. Phillips, Patrick C. G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Since the autosomal genome is shared between the sexes, sex-specific fitness optima present an evolutionary challenge. While sexually antagonistic selection might favor different alleles within females and males, segregation randomly reassorts alleles at autosomal loci between sexes each generation. This process of homogenization during transmission thus prevents between-sex allelic divergence generated by sexually antagonistic selection from accumulating across multiple generations. However, recent empirical studies have reported high male-female F(ST) statistics. Here, we use a population genetic model to evaluate whether these observations could plausibly be produced by sexually antagonistic selection. To do this, we use both a single-locus model with nonrandom mate choice, and individual-based simulations to study the relationship between strength of selection, degree of between-sex divergence, and the associated genetic load. We show that selection must be exceptionally strong to create measurable divergence between the sexes and that the decrease in population fitness due to this process is correspondingly high. Individual-based simulations with selection genome-wide recapitulate these patterns and indicate that small sample sizes and sampling variance can easily generate substantial male-female divergence. We therefore conclude that caution should be taken when interpreting autosomal allelic differentiation between the sexes. Genetics Society of America 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6829153/ /pubmed/31530636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400711 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kasimatis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Investigations Kasimatis, Katja R. Ralph, Peter L. Phillips, Patrick C. Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection |
title | Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection |
title_full | Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection |
title_fullStr | Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection |
title_short | Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection |
title_sort | limits to genomic divergence under sexually antagonistic selection |
topic | Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400711 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasimatiskatjar limitstogenomicdivergenceundersexuallyantagonisticselection AT ralphpeterl limitstogenomicdivergenceundersexuallyantagonisticselection AT phillipspatrickc limitstogenomicdivergenceundersexuallyantagonisticselection |