Cargando…

Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection

Since the autosomal genome is shared between the sexes, sex-specific fitness optima present an evolutionary challenge. While sexually antagonistic selection might favor different alleles within females and males, segregation randomly reassorts alleles at autosomal loci between sexes each generation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasimatis, Katja R., Ralph, Peter L., Phillips, Patrick C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400711
_version_ 1783465488798449664
author Kasimatis, Katja R.
Ralph, Peter L.
Phillips, Patrick C.
author_facet Kasimatis, Katja R.
Ralph, Peter L.
Phillips, Patrick C.
author_sort Kasimatis, Katja R.
collection PubMed
description Since the autosomal genome is shared between the sexes, sex-specific fitness optima present an evolutionary challenge. While sexually antagonistic selection might favor different alleles within females and males, segregation randomly reassorts alleles at autosomal loci between sexes each generation. This process of homogenization during transmission thus prevents between-sex allelic divergence generated by sexually antagonistic selection from accumulating across multiple generations. However, recent empirical studies have reported high male-female F(ST) statistics. Here, we use a population genetic model to evaluate whether these observations could plausibly be produced by sexually antagonistic selection. To do this, we use both a single-locus model with nonrandom mate choice, and individual-based simulations to study the relationship between strength of selection, degree of between-sex divergence, and the associated genetic load. We show that selection must be exceptionally strong to create measurable divergence between the sexes and that the decrease in population fitness due to this process is correspondingly high. Individual-based simulations with selection genome-wide recapitulate these patterns and indicate that small sample sizes and sampling variance can easily generate substantial male-female divergence. We therefore conclude that caution should be taken when interpreting autosomal allelic differentiation between the sexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6829153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68291532019-11-06 Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection Kasimatis, Katja R. Ralph, Peter L. Phillips, Patrick C. G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Since the autosomal genome is shared between the sexes, sex-specific fitness optima present an evolutionary challenge. While sexually antagonistic selection might favor different alleles within females and males, segregation randomly reassorts alleles at autosomal loci between sexes each generation. This process of homogenization during transmission thus prevents between-sex allelic divergence generated by sexually antagonistic selection from accumulating across multiple generations. However, recent empirical studies have reported high male-female F(ST) statistics. Here, we use a population genetic model to evaluate whether these observations could plausibly be produced by sexually antagonistic selection. To do this, we use both a single-locus model with nonrandom mate choice, and individual-based simulations to study the relationship between strength of selection, degree of between-sex divergence, and the associated genetic load. We show that selection must be exceptionally strong to create measurable divergence between the sexes and that the decrease in population fitness due to this process is correspondingly high. Individual-based simulations with selection genome-wide recapitulate these patterns and indicate that small sample sizes and sampling variance can easily generate substantial male-female divergence. We therefore conclude that caution should be taken when interpreting autosomal allelic differentiation between the sexes. Genetics Society of America 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6829153/ /pubmed/31530636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400711 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kasimatis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
Kasimatis, Katja R.
Ralph, Peter L.
Phillips, Patrick C.
Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
title Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
title_full Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
title_fullStr Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
title_full_unstemmed Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
title_short Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection
title_sort limits to genomic divergence under sexually antagonistic selection
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400711
work_keys_str_mv AT kasimatiskatjar limitstogenomicdivergenceundersexuallyantagonisticselection
AT ralphpeterl limitstogenomicdivergenceundersexuallyantagonisticselection
AT phillipspatrickc limitstogenomicdivergenceundersexuallyantagonisticselection