Cargando…
Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments
This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by Ja...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Les Laboratoires Servier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749655 http://dx.doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz |
_version_ | 1783465491862388736 |
---|---|
author | Moritz, Steffen Klein, Jan Philipp Lysaker, Paul H. Mehl, Stephanie |
author_facet | Moritz, Steffen Klein, Jan Philipp Lysaker, Paul H. Mehl, Stephanie |
author_sort | Moritz, Steffen |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition (“cognition about cognition”). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some “metacognitive knowledge” (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy.
|
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Les Laboratoires Servier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68291732019-11-20 Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments
Moritz, Steffen Klein, Jan Philipp Lysaker, Paul H. Mehl, Stephanie Dialogues Clin Neurosci Original Article This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition (“cognition about cognition”). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some “metacognitive knowledge” (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy.
Les Laboratoires Servier 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6829173/ /pubmed/31749655 http://dx.doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz Text en © 2019, AICH – Servier GroupCopyright © 2019 AICH – Servier Group. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moritz, Steffen Klein, Jan Philipp Lysaker, Paul H. Mehl, Stephanie Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments |
title | Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new
developments
|
title_full | Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new
developments
|
title_fullStr | Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new
developments
|
title_full_unstemmed | Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new
developments
|
title_short | Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new
developments
|
title_sort | metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new
developments
|
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749655 http://dx.doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moritzsteffen metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments AT kleinjanphilipp metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments AT lysakerpaulh metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments AT mehlstephanie metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments |