Cargando…

Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments


This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by Ja...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moritz, Steffen, Klein, Jan Philipp, Lysaker, Paul H., Mehl, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Les Laboratoires Servier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749655
http://dx.doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz
_version_ 1783465491862388736
author Moritz, Steffen
Klein, Jan Philipp
Lysaker, Paul H.
Mehl, Stephanie
author_facet Moritz, Steffen
Klein, Jan Philipp
Lysaker, Paul H.
Mehl, Stephanie
author_sort Moritz, Steffen
collection PubMed
description This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition (“cognition about cognition”). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some “metacognitive knowledge” (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy.

format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6829173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Les Laboratoires Servier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68291732019-11-20 Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments
 Moritz, Steffen Klein, Jan Philipp Lysaker, Paul H. Mehl, Stephanie Dialogues Clin Neurosci Original Article This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition (“cognition about cognition”). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some “metacognitive knowledge” (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy.
 Les Laboratoires Servier 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6829173/ /pubmed/31749655 http://dx.doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz Text en © 2019, AICH – Servier GroupCopyright © 2019 AICH – Servier Group. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moritz, Steffen
Klein, Jan Philipp
Lysaker, Paul H.
Mehl, Stephanie
Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments

title Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments

title_full Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments

title_fullStr Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments

title_full_unstemmed Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments

title_short Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments

title_sort metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments

topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749655
http://dx.doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz
work_keys_str_mv AT moritzsteffen metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments
AT kleinjanphilipp metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments
AT lysakerpaulh metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments
AT mehlstephanie metacognitiveandcognitivebehavioralinterventionsforpsychosisnewdevelopments