Cargando…
Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2)
This study aims to investigate the physical and chemical characterization of six fly ash samples obtained from different municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs), namely grate furnaces, rotary kiln, and fluidized bed reactor, to determine their potential for CO(2) and thermochemical energy storage...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12203358 |
_version_ | 1783465534396825600 |
---|---|
author | Setoodeh Jahromy, Saman Azam, Mudassar Huber, Florian Jordan, Christian Wesenauer, Florian Huber, Clemens Naghdi, Shaghayegh Schwendtner, Karolina Neuwirth, Erich Laminger, Thomas Eder, Dominik Werner, Andreas Harasek, Michael Winter, Franz |
author_facet | Setoodeh Jahromy, Saman Azam, Mudassar Huber, Florian Jordan, Christian Wesenauer, Florian Huber, Clemens Naghdi, Shaghayegh Schwendtner, Karolina Neuwirth, Erich Laminger, Thomas Eder, Dominik Werner, Andreas Harasek, Michael Winter, Franz |
author_sort | Setoodeh Jahromy, Saman |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims to investigate the physical and chemical characterization of six fly ash samples obtained from different municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs), namely grate furnaces, rotary kiln, and fluidized bed reactor, to determine their potential for CO(2) and thermochemical energy storage (TCES). Representative samples were characterized via simultaneous thermal analysis (STA) in different atmospheres, i.e., N(2), air, H(2)O, CO(2), and H(2)O/CO(2), to identify fly ash samples that can meet the minimum requirements, i.e., charging, discharging, and cycling stability, for its consideration as TCES and CO(2)-storage materials and to determine their energy contents. Furthermore, other techniques, such as inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy, leachability tests, specific surface area measurement based on the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, and particle-size distribution measurement, were performed. XRF analysis showed that calcium oxide is one of the main components in fly ash, which is a potentially suitable component for TCES systems. XRD results revealed information regarding the crystal structure and phases of various elements, including that of Ca. The STA measurements showed that the samples can store thermal heat with energy contents of 50–394 kJ/kg (charging step). For one fly ash sample obtained from a grate furnace, the release of the stored thermal heat under the selected experimental conditions (discharging step) was demonstrated. The cycling stability tests were conducted thrice, and they were successful for the selected sample. One fly ash sample could store CO(2) with a storage capacity of 27 kg CO(2)/ton based on results obtained under the selected experimental conditions in STA. Samples from rotary kiln and fluidized bed were heated up to 1150 °C in an N(2) atmosphere, resulting in complete melting of samples in crucibles; however, other samples obtained from grate furnaces formed compacted powders after undergoing the same thermal treatment in STA. Samples from different grate furnaces showed similarities in their chemical and physical characterization. The leachability test according to the standard (EN 12457-4 (2002)) using water in a ratio of 10 L/S and showed that the leachate of heavy metals is below the maximum permissible values for nonhazardous materials (except for Pb), excluding the fly ash sample obtained using fluidized bed technology. The leachate contents of Cd and Mn in the fly ash samples obtained from the rotary kiln were higher than those in other samples. Characterization performed herein helped in determining the suitable fly ash samples that can be considered as potential CO(2)-storage and TCES materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68293502019-11-18 Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2) Setoodeh Jahromy, Saman Azam, Mudassar Huber, Florian Jordan, Christian Wesenauer, Florian Huber, Clemens Naghdi, Shaghayegh Schwendtner, Karolina Neuwirth, Erich Laminger, Thomas Eder, Dominik Werner, Andreas Harasek, Michael Winter, Franz Materials (Basel) Article This study aims to investigate the physical and chemical characterization of six fly ash samples obtained from different municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs), namely grate furnaces, rotary kiln, and fluidized bed reactor, to determine their potential for CO(2) and thermochemical energy storage (TCES). Representative samples were characterized via simultaneous thermal analysis (STA) in different atmospheres, i.e., N(2), air, H(2)O, CO(2), and H(2)O/CO(2), to identify fly ash samples that can meet the minimum requirements, i.e., charging, discharging, and cycling stability, for its consideration as TCES and CO(2)-storage materials and to determine their energy contents. Furthermore, other techniques, such as inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy, leachability tests, specific surface area measurement based on the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, and particle-size distribution measurement, were performed. XRF analysis showed that calcium oxide is one of the main components in fly ash, which is a potentially suitable component for TCES systems. XRD results revealed information regarding the crystal structure and phases of various elements, including that of Ca. The STA measurements showed that the samples can store thermal heat with energy contents of 50–394 kJ/kg (charging step). For one fly ash sample obtained from a grate furnace, the release of the stored thermal heat under the selected experimental conditions (discharging step) was demonstrated. The cycling stability tests were conducted thrice, and they were successful for the selected sample. One fly ash sample could store CO(2) with a storage capacity of 27 kg CO(2)/ton based on results obtained under the selected experimental conditions in STA. Samples from rotary kiln and fluidized bed were heated up to 1150 °C in an N(2) atmosphere, resulting in complete melting of samples in crucibles; however, other samples obtained from grate furnaces formed compacted powders after undergoing the same thermal treatment in STA. Samples from different grate furnaces showed similarities in their chemical and physical characterization. The leachability test according to the standard (EN 12457-4 (2002)) using water in a ratio of 10 L/S and showed that the leachate of heavy metals is below the maximum permissible values for nonhazardous materials (except for Pb), excluding the fly ash sample obtained using fluidized bed technology. The leachate contents of Cd and Mn in the fly ash samples obtained from the rotary kiln were higher than those in other samples. Characterization performed herein helped in determining the suitable fly ash samples that can be considered as potential CO(2)-storage and TCES materials. MDPI 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6829350/ /pubmed/31618854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12203358 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Setoodeh Jahromy, Saman Azam, Mudassar Huber, Florian Jordan, Christian Wesenauer, Florian Huber, Clemens Naghdi, Shaghayegh Schwendtner, Karolina Neuwirth, Erich Laminger, Thomas Eder, Dominik Werner, Andreas Harasek, Michael Winter, Franz Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2) |
title | Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2) |
title_full | Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2) |
title_fullStr | Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2) |
title_short | Comparing Fly Ash Samples from Different Types of Incinerators for Their Potential as Storage Materials for Thermochemical Energy and CO(2) |
title_sort | comparing fly ash samples from different types of incinerators for their potential as storage materials for thermochemical energy and co(2) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12203358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT setoodehjahromysaman comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT azammudassar comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT huberflorian comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT jordanchristian comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT wesenauerflorian comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT huberclemens comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT naghdishaghayegh comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT schwendtnerkarolina comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT neuwirtherich comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT lamingerthomas comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT ederdominik comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT wernerandreas comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT harasekmichael comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 AT winterfranz comparingflyashsamplesfromdifferenttypesofincineratorsfortheirpotentialasstoragematerialsforthermochemicalenergyandco2 |