Cargando…

The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: As a part of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, both intraoperative lidocaine and esmolol facilitate postoperative analgesia. Our objective was to compare these two emerging strategies that challenge the use of intraoperative opioids. We aimed to assess if intraoperat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajracharya, Joshan Lal, Subedi, Asish, Pokharel, Krishna, Bhattarai, Balkrishna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0874-8
_version_ 1783465644089409536
author Bajracharya, Joshan Lal
Subedi, Asish
Pokharel, Krishna
Bhattarai, Balkrishna
author_facet Bajracharya, Joshan Lal
Subedi, Asish
Pokharel, Krishna
Bhattarai, Balkrishna
author_sort Bajracharya, Joshan Lal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As a part of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, both intraoperative lidocaine and esmolol facilitate postoperative analgesia. Our objective was to compare these two emerging strategies that challenge the use of intraoperative opioids. We aimed to assess if intraoperative esmolol infusion is not inferior to lidocaine infusion for opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial, 90 female patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received either intravenous (IV) lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (1.5 mg/ kg/h) or IV bolus of esmolol 0.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (5–15 μg/kg/min) till the end of surgery. Remaining aspect of anesthesia followed a standard protocol apart from no intraoperative opioid supplementation. Postoperatively, patients received either morphine or tramadol IV to maintain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ≤3. The primary outcome was opioid consumption (in morphine equivalents) during the first 24 postoperative hours. Pain and sedation scores, time to first perception of pain and void, and occurrence of nausea/vomiting were secondary outcomes measured up to 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Two patients in each group were excluded from the analysis. The postoperative median (IQR) morphine equivalent consumption in patients receiving esmolol was 1 (0–1.5) mg compared to 1.5 (1–2) mg in lidocaine group (p = 0.27). The median pain scores at various time points were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). More patients receiving lidocaine were sedated in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) than those receiving esmolol (p < 0.05); however, no difference was detected later. CONCLUSION: Infusion of esmolol is not inferior to lidocaine in terms of opioid requirement and pain severity in the first 24 h after surgery. Patients receiving lidocaine were more sedated during their stay in PACU than those receiving esmolol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT02327923. Date of registration: December 31, 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6829809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68298092019-11-07 The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial Bajracharya, Joshan Lal Subedi, Asish Pokharel, Krishna Bhattarai, Balkrishna BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: As a part of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, both intraoperative lidocaine and esmolol facilitate postoperative analgesia. Our objective was to compare these two emerging strategies that challenge the use of intraoperative opioids. We aimed to assess if intraoperative esmolol infusion is not inferior to lidocaine infusion for opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial, 90 female patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received either intravenous (IV) lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (1.5 mg/ kg/h) or IV bolus of esmolol 0.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (5–15 μg/kg/min) till the end of surgery. Remaining aspect of anesthesia followed a standard protocol apart from no intraoperative opioid supplementation. Postoperatively, patients received either morphine or tramadol IV to maintain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ≤3. The primary outcome was opioid consumption (in morphine equivalents) during the first 24 postoperative hours. Pain and sedation scores, time to first perception of pain and void, and occurrence of nausea/vomiting were secondary outcomes measured up to 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Two patients in each group were excluded from the analysis. The postoperative median (IQR) morphine equivalent consumption in patients receiving esmolol was 1 (0–1.5) mg compared to 1.5 (1–2) mg in lidocaine group (p = 0.27). The median pain scores at various time points were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). More patients receiving lidocaine were sedated in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) than those receiving esmolol (p < 0.05); however, no difference was detected later. CONCLUSION: Infusion of esmolol is not inferior to lidocaine in terms of opioid requirement and pain severity in the first 24 h after surgery. Patients receiving lidocaine were more sedated during their stay in PACU than those receiving esmolol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT02327923. Date of registration: December 31, 2014. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829809/ /pubmed/31684867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0874-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bajracharya, Joshan Lal
Subedi, Asish
Pokharel, Krishna
Bhattarai, Balkrishna
The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
title The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
title_full The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
title_short The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0874-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bajracharyajoshanlal theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT subediasish theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pokharelkrishna theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bhattaraibalkrishna theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bajracharyajoshanlal effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT subediasish effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pokharelkrishna effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bhattaraibalkrishna effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial