Cargando…
The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: As a part of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, both intraoperative lidocaine and esmolol facilitate postoperative analgesia. Our objective was to compare these two emerging strategies that challenge the use of intraoperative opioids. We aimed to assess if intraoperat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0874-8 |
_version_ | 1783465644089409536 |
---|---|
author | Bajracharya, Joshan Lal Subedi, Asish Pokharel, Krishna Bhattarai, Balkrishna |
author_facet | Bajracharya, Joshan Lal Subedi, Asish Pokharel, Krishna Bhattarai, Balkrishna |
author_sort | Bajracharya, Joshan Lal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As a part of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, both intraoperative lidocaine and esmolol facilitate postoperative analgesia. Our objective was to compare these two emerging strategies that challenge the use of intraoperative opioids. We aimed to assess if intraoperative esmolol infusion is not inferior to lidocaine infusion for opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial, 90 female patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received either intravenous (IV) lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (1.5 mg/ kg/h) or IV bolus of esmolol 0.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (5–15 μg/kg/min) till the end of surgery. Remaining aspect of anesthesia followed a standard protocol apart from no intraoperative opioid supplementation. Postoperatively, patients received either morphine or tramadol IV to maintain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ≤3. The primary outcome was opioid consumption (in morphine equivalents) during the first 24 postoperative hours. Pain and sedation scores, time to first perception of pain and void, and occurrence of nausea/vomiting were secondary outcomes measured up to 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Two patients in each group were excluded from the analysis. The postoperative median (IQR) morphine equivalent consumption in patients receiving esmolol was 1 (0–1.5) mg compared to 1.5 (1–2) mg in lidocaine group (p = 0.27). The median pain scores at various time points were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). More patients receiving lidocaine were sedated in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) than those receiving esmolol (p < 0.05); however, no difference was detected later. CONCLUSION: Infusion of esmolol is not inferior to lidocaine in terms of opioid requirement and pain severity in the first 24 h after surgery. Patients receiving lidocaine were more sedated during their stay in PACU than those receiving esmolol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT02327923. Date of registration: December 31, 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6829809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68298092019-11-07 The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial Bajracharya, Joshan Lal Subedi, Asish Pokharel, Krishna Bhattarai, Balkrishna BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: As a part of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, both intraoperative lidocaine and esmolol facilitate postoperative analgesia. Our objective was to compare these two emerging strategies that challenge the use of intraoperative opioids. We aimed to assess if intraoperative esmolol infusion is not inferior to lidocaine infusion for opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial, 90 female patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received either intravenous (IV) lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (1.5 mg/ kg/h) or IV bolus of esmolol 0.5 mg/kg at induction followed by an infusion (5–15 μg/kg/min) till the end of surgery. Remaining aspect of anesthesia followed a standard protocol apart from no intraoperative opioid supplementation. Postoperatively, patients received either morphine or tramadol IV to maintain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ≤3. The primary outcome was opioid consumption (in morphine equivalents) during the first 24 postoperative hours. Pain and sedation scores, time to first perception of pain and void, and occurrence of nausea/vomiting were secondary outcomes measured up to 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Two patients in each group were excluded from the analysis. The postoperative median (IQR) morphine equivalent consumption in patients receiving esmolol was 1 (0–1.5) mg compared to 1.5 (1–2) mg in lidocaine group (p = 0.27). The median pain scores at various time points were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). More patients receiving lidocaine were sedated in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) than those receiving esmolol (p < 0.05); however, no difference was detected later. CONCLUSION: Infusion of esmolol is not inferior to lidocaine in terms of opioid requirement and pain severity in the first 24 h after surgery. Patients receiving lidocaine were more sedated during their stay in PACU than those receiving esmolol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT02327923. Date of registration: December 31, 2014. BioMed Central 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6829809/ /pubmed/31684867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0874-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bajracharya, Joshan Lal Subedi, Asish Pokharel, Krishna Bhattarai, Balkrishna The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial |
title | The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full | The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial |
title_short | The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6829809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31684867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0874-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bajracharyajoshanlal theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial AT subediasish theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial AT pokharelkrishna theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bhattaraibalkrishna theeffectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bajracharyajoshanlal effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial AT subediasish effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial AT pokharelkrishna effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bhattaraibalkrishna effectofintraoperativelidocaineversusesmololinfusiononpostoperativeanalgesiainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial |